The Dawson-Hopkins-Pascal delicate case
As you all know, Pascal had a very controversial draw with Pappy Hopkins lately and was normally scheduled to fight Dawson as they did sign a revenge clause in their contract. However, the WBC just voted by a wide margin that Pacal must grant a revenge to Hopkins right away or be stripped from his belt.
GYM are now on a tough spot as Gary Shaw said he would not back off and would go to court if it was necessary, which would be unfortunate because him and Yvon Michel are good friends. Personally, I say that it doesn't make sense for both Dawson and Pascal to fight for no belts and that the best option would be go get an agreement with Golden Boy where the winner of Pascal-Hopkins has to fight Dawson right after but I don't know if Shaw and the Dawson clan will see it that way.
Any thoughts on that?
Re: The Dawson-Hopkins-Pascal delicate case
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
As you all know, Pascal had a very controversial draw with Pappy Hopkins lately and was normally scheduled to fight Dawson as they did sign a revenge clause in their contract. However, the WBC just voted by a wide margin that Pacal must grant a revenge to Hopkins right away or be stripped from his belt.
GYM are now on a tough spot as Gary Shaw said he would not back off and would go to court if it was necessary, which would be unfortunate because him and Yvon Michel are good friends. Personally, I say that it doesn't make sense for both Dawson and Pascal to fight for no belts and that the best option would be go get an agreement with Golden Boy where the winner of Pascal-Hopkins has to fight Dawson right after but I don't know if Shaw and the Dawson clan will see it that way.
Any thoughts on that?
I imagine this is just a quote to get Dawson a bigger step aside purse. They know Pascal is backed into a corner, so whomever steps aside is gunna get paid. I don't think it is all that delicate. In the end, all 3 sides will come to an agreement.
