Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Just listening to Adameks people on the bbc show and they say which ever Klit they agree to in Sept they have to fight the other one if they win? What is all the about, pisses me off that.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
It keeps the money pool in the family, I guess. It's not right though, it's like Matthew Hatton telling each of his opponents that if he loses they must fight big, bad Ricky. That would never fly and yet it does for the Klits. It's bollocks really.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
This is why I hate the Klitschko's and can't wait for them to retire.
One of them needs to be assassinated :mad:
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Just listening to Adameks people on the bbc show and they say which ever Klit they agree to in Sept they have to fight the other one if they win? What is all the about, pisses me off that.
Note though, that this clause is only inserted if you fight Wlad first. I'll bet Arreola didn't have it in his contract that if he won he had to fight Wlad.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Just listening to Adameks people on the bbc show and they say which ever Klit they agree to in Sept they have to fight the other one if they win? What is all the about, pisses me off that.
Note though, that this clause is only inserted if you fight Wlad first. I'll bet Arreola didn't have it in his contract that if he won he had to fight Wlad.
Well Adameks manager has said which ever Klit he fights the deal is the same if he wins he fights the other brother. So it doesn't matter which brother he fights first he has to fight the other one.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
These guys get away with some ridiculous stipulations. Vitali is the better fighter, anyone that thinks Wlad is the threat...pass that shit to me.:wackomz4:
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Lyle come off it. Logical step or not, that's no reason to have it written in to a contract ay?
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
These guys get away with some ridiculous stipulations. Vitali is the better fighter, anyone that thinks Wlad is the threat...pass that shit to me.:wackomz4:
:vd:
This thread is ridiculous. The next logical step for anyone that beats either brother, the next biggest fight they could possibly have is vs the other brother.
Also the only fighters to ever fight both brothers are: Chris Byrd, Sam Peter, Ross Purrity and Corrie Sanders....that's a small list considering how many fights they have had and how vulnerable all of you think Wlad is.
Jesus you seriously can't have a clear view about the Klits, it doesn't matter if his brother is number 1 or 100 why the fuck should he have to fight the other brother if he wins? Let him make that decision as he will be the champion.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
I would love for someone to beat Vitali and force Wlad into the position of saving the family name ;D He'd probably have a breakdown and come out.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
I would love for someone to beat Vitali and force Wlad into the position of saving the family name ;D He'd probably have a breakdown and come out.
Chris Byrd didn't have a fun time with it.
Yeah that's because he didn't have a fun time with Vitalli neither ;)
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
It's true they are treated as though they are one entity; you go into negotiation with the brothers not one or the other. And usually punchers are made to face Vitali it's a complete joke if a fighter had Just beaten Wlad and wanted to fight a soft touch before fighting Vitali on his terms it would not be allowed The contract would probably treat the newly crowned champ unfavourably due to it being negotiated before he was champ.
It's basically a tag team the brothers via all opponents with Vitali used to mask all of Wlads vulnerability I mean the Areola that fought Vitali would have given Wlad a hell of a fight everyone knows he hates non stop relentless pressure etc it goes on it's a joke.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Cris Arreola has nothing for Wlad. Sure Arreola can take a punch but at the same time you have to realize that now'a'days Vitali fights at a slower pace than Wlad and Wlad has a better arsenal of punches. Plus Arreola was resigned to just last the distance after the first half of the fight.
You guys will see a whole new monster when he fights Chisora...it won't last long. Manny's going to have Wlad gunning for earlier more spectacular KO's and Wlad is very capable of delivering them given the state of the rest of the division.
Haha what against the mighty Chisora? OOOOOOO I don't no about that. Jesus you are easily pleased mate he could come in the ring looking like a giant version of Pac he is fighting a 14 fight novice who hasn'tr even been further than 9 rounds.
