Was a ROBBERY Please look :D

In sheer desperation at seeing a thread discussing a fight that the opening poster had not even seen topping the forum board, and being quoted again and again as some magic proof that black is really white and the sun goes around the earth i started this one. Unlike the aforementioned thread i shall not be employing the opinions of those who thought Juan Manuel Marquez won, and was thereby ROBBED of a deserved victory, to prove that the awarding of the fight to Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao was fair and just. I am not posting from Mexico. I will not be threatened into cowardice by unbased accusations of being a pac-hater, which apparently is the opposite of Flomophobia. I will not be cowed and silenced however many times Fenster (bless his Stetson) says FACT like some bizzare forum card game.In fact i will close my eyes and pray to the God of Boxing forums that any other thread replaces the, Not a ROBBERY please look thread. Maybe if i am really good i will get some more books for my boxing library this Christmas and Fenster will think one of my posts is BRILLIANT.

Keep on rockin in a free world :cool:

I'm getting a bit bored of it now. Time to move on to the next drama.

Cotto vs Margo is massive for me, the whole glove thing, the rematch for the fan favourite but against a guy that has a very real chance of beating him up.

Hopefully we'll see a conclusive fight so we can all just get along. (how boring would that be!?)

One of the biggest robjobs of the past decade.. Somebody needs to be handcuffed for this.

Juan Carlos Burgos !! ;D

Definite robbery and the numbers who see a decisive Marquez win or a clear Marquez win are there for all to see. It all points towards the notion that the fight was indeed a robbery. It takes more than a 5 person cross analysis to debunk the overwhelming consensus.

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...arobbery-1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...arobbery-1.jpg

---

Now it's just getting sad. It's to the point now that people are saying PAC didn't land a fuckingnpunch.

NOBODY...NOBODY said pac didn't land a punch.

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...cons/icon1.gif How did you score Pac/Marquez 3?

the thread quoted to support the NOT a robbery please look thread has received only 716 views despite being quoted as the reason for the NOT a robbery post. Whilst the NOT a robbery post itself has recieved 2270 views! So the misinformation pedalled is making a sad situation sadder. To the point where now people are accusing anyone who thought Marquez won as being obsessive JMM worshipers. It is sad that people who had not watched the fight would have their crackpot opinions given more importance than the original opinions of people who took the time to not only watch the fight but then go through it again and score it. This is not a lets have a pop at Pacqiao thread it is a plea for sanity from a fan of Boxing. The judges decision is not going to be overturned but lets not let the measured opinion of decent fight fans who saw a clear injustice be rubbished by the ignorant few who seek to twist their views and then get congratulated for it by a forum moderator.

Okay. I think it's time for you to clean your crack pipe home skillet ;)

Just finished the fight again


JMM has ROUNDS 5 and 7 as TOTALLY his. If you have any other round that you think were CLEARLY a MARQUEZ round please tell me.



You have it as 116-112 Marquez and you say its a robbery????

Manny did not look to be outlanding Marquez to any obvious degree though and it was clear who landed the more telling blows throughout.

And I debunk compubox, clearly they are in with Arum, the judges and HBO in being completely biased. The post fight outrage speaks for itself.

Manny walked away after the final bell looking like a broken man, the crowd booed the result in a way we haven't seen since forever, forum polls show Marquez dominating as the favoured winner. The Manny won camp boils down to Lederman, the judges and half a dozen diehards scattered over the internet.

The fix was in and the powers that be robbed the man who once again outboxed the poster boy.

I'll send you a signed photo if you like?

I'm not arrogant enough to believe my scorecard is 100% bombproof definitive. I accept scoring fights is open to interpretation. It's subjective.

It was utterly IRRELEVANT whether or not miron_lang had seen the fight. His post highlighted a contradiction in peoples scorecards. It was a great expose on the hypocrisy of "robberies" in boxing. His idea could be put to use on all the robbery claims over the years, the fact it was this bout is irrelevant.

So, unless you believe your opinion is far superior to anyone elses (like Miles ;)), then it should be perfectly reasonable to accept people interpeted a fight different. Simple as that. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

I'll send you a signed photo if you like?

I'm not arrogant enough to believe my scorecard is 100% bombproof definitive. I accept scoring fights is open to interpretation. It's subjective.

It was utterly IRRELEVANT whether or not miron_lang had seen the fight. His post highlighted a contradiction in peoples scorecards. It was a great expose on the hypocrisy of "robberies" in boxing. His idea could be put to use on all the robbery claims over the years, the fact it was this bout is irrelevant.

So, unless you believe your opinion is far superior to anyone elses (like Miles ;)), then it should be perfectly reasonable to accept people interpeted a fight different. Simple as that. ;)

---

http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/u...fs/1078584.gif

Erase my superior judgement and that is just one view less in a massive sea of views that all have Marquez the winner.

i dunno if anyone is aware but i still havent seen the fight