Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
Obviously the first one that pops to mind is the Pac/Bradley fiasco from last week. But what were the other big Compubox blowouts that didn't result in a win?
I ask because I just rewatched Lewis/Holyfield 1, which obviously ended in a controversial draw, where, according to Compubox, Lewis outlanded Holyfield a whopping 348 to 130 throughout the fight.
Can anyone think of any other complete punchstat blowouts that didn't result in a win?
Re: Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
Imagine two people recently fired from Sears given a key pad with buttons to compensate for a 10 point must system with thrown landed and actually being able to watch the fight to attempt it?
Re: Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
Macklin v Sturm was pretty condemning. It always staggers me how a reasonable % of people had Sturm winning this let alone close (though granted most had Macklin, was about 70/30).
Check them power punches, 12 rounds to zip and only 1 frickin round where the power punches were even remotely close in number.
Felix Sturm vs. Matthew Macklin - CompuBox
Re: Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
On the very same card, Randall Bailey only landed 2 power punches and still got the win:p
Re: Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
Tarver vs Johnson 1, if my memory serves me right. Johnson gets the nod because he was the aggressor even though he was consistently getting outlanded by Tarver.
Re: Biggest Compubox advantage that DIDN'T result in a win?
Compubox has no sympathy. It was a con, or else just corrucpt