Printable View
Why no one is talking about Bradley vs his mandatory(Keith Thurman)?
If I was Al Haymon, I'll make that fight happen. Even if he have to give up the promotion money for that one fight. Even give Thurman money behind the back knowing TR won't offer Thurman that much.
Can anybody see Thurman winning that fight if it was possible?
That just isn't going to happen. Neither GBP or TR are willing to budge when it comes to giving up their promotional rights to the other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant Live
Also, why would Haymon/GBP do that? The ball is in their court as mandatory they can force Bradley to relenquish the title, then they'll have a hold on every belt in the division and TR would have very little to offer Bradley/Pacquiao/Rios/Alvarado apart from fights against each other. Eventually one of them will get pissed off and move on. Then GBP will pick that guy up.
A lot of people on this forum said Guerrero was a step ahead of Thurman and made no business sense for them Guerrero to fight him. Well if that's any what true it makes no sense for Bradley
It makes absolutely no sense for Bradley. He should be getting a big name fight, not a mandatory vs a largely unproven up and comer. He has nothing to gain by fighting THurman and everything to lose.
Bradley has bigger fish to fry.
Bradley is with Top Rank and GBP have Thurman but they worked together at times. Bradley wants to maximise his money and Thurman will not do that yet as he is not established. He is also dangerous.
Fuck having to chase Bradley all over the ring n looking bad. Let Thurman fight Ortiz, Berto, or the Maidana vs. Broner winner.