Surprise! Another bad scorecard
how would a judge ever have martiroysen beating andrade? even the scorecard that had andrade winning by only 1 point was bad. i feel like there have been so many terrible scorecards in the last few years that judges should just start getting fired for obviously not being able to judge. there is no way you could watch the fight and have martiroysen winning. i had him winning 2 rounds and the one he was losing but got a KD. i could see the most giving him would be 4 rounds. the judge have him the first 4 rounds. that shows how bad it was because the 2nd round was so clearly andrade that you would have to be blind to not give him the round.
anyways, im so tired of these bad scorecards.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
Martirosyan was less active, but landed the cleaner, harder punches. Andrade was busier with his jab.
I scored it 114-113 for Andrade, 7 rounds to 5 plus the knockdown.
I thought Max Kellerman's commentary was extremely biased in favor of Andrade, and perhaps was misleading viewers. The wide 117-110 score for Andrade was just as bad as the 115-112 for Martirosyan.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Freedom
Martirosyan was less active, but landed the cleaner, harder punches. Andrade was busier with his jab.
I scored it 114-113 for Andrade, 7 rounds to 5 plus the knockdown.
I thought Max Kellerman's commentary was extremely biased in favor of Andrade, and perhaps was misleading viewers. The wide 117-110 score for Andrade was just as bad as the 115-112 for Martirosyan.
Good point on equal gap for Andrade. I had him winning but you can see a scenario watching that fight where Andrade was waiting way too much, watching and often almost one handed and his footwork was crossed and bad. Vanes was sloppy but attempting to set a pace and landing his share. If it was "just Martirosyan" as Max repeated and a showcase to stake claim for young Andrade who was dropping Canelo and Mayweathers name prior...he'll next to do more next time around. Much more.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
In light of recent travesties one would thing judges would be extra judicious right now but apparently caution to the wind is the rule.
Atleast the judging for championship fights should be the exclusive realm of tested and experienced judges and not trial horses. Same with referees!
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
are people seriously thinking that it was mex kellerman that swayed everybody to think that andrade won the fight easily? haha.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
are people seriously thinking that it was mex kellerman that swayed everybody to think that andrade won the fight easily? haha.
Nah, it's just that not everyone saw it a 117-111 result Pointing out a guy heavily pushing a guy doesn't translate to him influencing even minded fans, at least it shouldn't and more importantly the judges. It is hbo after all, home of the King if distortion himself Jim Lampley.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
are people seriously thinking that it was mex kellerman that swayed everybody to think that andrade won the fight easily? haha.
Nah, it's just that not everyone saw it a 117-111 result Pointing out a guy heavily pushing a guy doesn't translate to him influencing even minded fans, at least it shouldn't and more importantly the judges. It is hbo after all, home of the King if distortion himself Jim Lampley.
im not saying you have to have it that wide, but if you even think that you could give the fight to martyrosan then you are blind.
Re: Surprise! Another bad scorecard
There's no way anyone could score that fight for Martirosyan & keep a straight face
Judge needs to be disciplined