Printable View
Time for old man vitali too go
If he does no bullshit mandatory with Stiverne
8 man tournament 2 fights on one night two fights on another.
Have a 24/7 type show for each event or episode for each fighter brackets
MSG
Adamek vs Stiverne
Vs winner of
Jennings vs wilder
In the Uk
Tyson fury vs Arreola a lot of shit talking here
Vs
Perez vs Pulev only guy I threw in not ranked in the WBC
My prediction wilder vs Perez final
Wilder the king wins the belt brings it home
Ummm....no Wlad?
naa id rather it be goodQuote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Pulev v Wilder final i reckon
id say in the bottom half of the draw Perez could be the worst
Humph!?!? No Haye, Stiverne or Wald.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44naa id rather it be goodQuote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Pulev v Wilder final i reckon
id say in the bottom half of the draw Perez could be the worst
You are going to have big guys trying to twist your head off!
Why not have all the belts unified? I mean that's one (of the many :rolleyes: ) things posters always complain about. Put Wlad in the tournament or just have him fight the winner of the tournament.
Also for what it's worth I think the better style matchups would be
Stiverne vs Wilder
Adamek vs Jennings
Arreola vs Fury would be very good though
Two words. Jose Sulaiman. They guy has nightmares over an undisputed champion or even the unification of two with few exceptions. Its part of his admitted mandate not to share his champion with another tin pot. He will ensure this by excluding Wlad in any tourney for his belt.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
There is a real chance at an undisputed champion at 175 also but I'd wager he sticks his paws into that also at some point.
Four man tournament would be the only way to legitamise having a WBC belt.
8 man would be to difficult to organise.
Stiverne will keep twiddling his thumbs until Vitali officially retires, which might not be until September, is there fan pressure to strip Vitali, so Stiverne can have a match vs Wilder to become Champion.
Not so much considering Wilder's lack of opposition.
Stiverne's rightful stubbornness to not fight until he gets his mandatory does not do him any favours.
I think if Fury can get his head back and focus he could win and hold the belt, but I have a feeling the Haye fiasco may have messed with his head and he may have regressed backwards.
I am thinking Arreola or Stiverne. Proven fighters.
I think a rematch between those two would be good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
How is Arreola a prove fighter? While guys like Ali, Fraizer and Foreman were bums?Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
Because they are modern heavyweights and have the size and weight and the latest technological advances. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeHow is Arreola a prove fighter? While guys like Ali, Fraizer and Foreman were bums?Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
The WBC titleholder will have no credibility until he beats Wlad.
Stiverne-Arreola II. Winner fights WladKlit. Wilder fight Jennings or Perez :cool:
The WBC has mandatory challengers.... they should give the 1 and 2 guys a chance to fight for it.