More Royal Noncesense
Be careful of Prince Phillip. Not only is he rude, but he is a pedophile and seemingly wants to impregnate his own children.
Printable View
More Royal Noncesense
Be careful of Prince Phillip. Not only is he rude, but he is a pedophile and seemingly wants to impregnate his own children.
I couldn't care less about social order or any such nonsense. All I care about is truth and when abusive men do bad things, I get angry. There are a lot of rumours about prince Philip. We know why they are covering it up. But does that make it okay?
The Queen herself owes a lot of explanations. If she doesn't then she proves that the UK is no different to North Korea.
I am quite angry. However, living there I would be more angry. I am surprised there is no revolution.
These people are perverted. They vanish children and the English are learning this now.
Of course, I am being nice. The entire Royal family is nasty. To be involved in such a sect is bad.
Miles, among other things that article states
'For anyone who doesn’t know, the NSPCC is a front for paedophilia'.
Really? Really?
Yeah,I dont trust that bloke he married either.
Seemingly some of these organisations are run by questionable people. I suspect we will see more articles about Mandelson (allegedly) coming out soonish and he apparently chairs one of them (cannot recall which). There are worrying links in all areas where you think children should be being protected.Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanman
As for Prince Phillip, he seems a very questionable sort based on the evidence of that article and other research easily looked into. We spend millions on locking up a non-rapist in Julian Assange, but we give these perverted Royals their silly ceremonies which cost tens of millions and which are typically disrespected with with the most insidious behaviour in a matter of months. They literally spit upon us all laughing as we struggle.
I can imagine the Queen sneering 'How dull and moral they all are...and poor too.' 'Just eaters, my dear', frowns Phillip. These are not good people and are no example. The only reason for them to be there is to be an example and they offer scandal, scandal and perversion. It's a recipe book of how not to lead a country. An argument can be made, 'but the city of London brings in money!'. But for whom and what cost, none of these things offer anything outside of the square mile.
Here's another article touching upon his behaviour. Of course he met the Queen at 13! Red flags there alone and if it was only the one rumour or whatever, I would leave it, but it's an endless litany of naughtiness.
Prince Philip, Filthy Secrets, Princess Diana, Jimmy Savile and the 100 Year D-Notice | thecolemanexperience
Whoops. I was thinking of Prince Charles and that bloke he married.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreWhoops. I was thinking of Prince Charles and that bloke he married.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Yes Andre you are thinking of - Camilla Parks Her Bowels.
I cannot believe I have seen images of many of the Royals naked. What is wrong with these people? Plain old perversion, that's what! :)
If you put "Lovely Royal Nudy Pics" into Google what do you expect? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Even the horse has had an attempt at looking erotic with tits hanging out. Obviously a nasty mess. I don't search these things, but witnessed it on Spivey's website. Kate Middleton too. These people clearly have no shame despite their present or future position. They are a horrid cauldron of nastiness.
I feel genuine anger and disgust at these people. If more were aware, these people would have no choice but to be privatised. It's ironic that EVERYTHING else can go private, but these nasty freaks remain in the national coffers. Benefits street should have been about these people who are far more dysfunctional than the poor of England.
Sir Rolf Harris
Sir Jimmy Saville
Sir Lord Brittan
Sir Cyril Smith
Is there anyone these freaks won't celebrate? All it takes is a step and the monarchy is drawn. And in a democracy the monarchy must fall. Look at those names, the Queen is clearly blind to anything decent and British. She is a pedo lover.
She must answer in a public enquiry. Not only is her husband a pervert but she is an evasive dog.
Dude, did you not read the 'About Me' page? "if it’s on here, it’s true" ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ryanman
Chris Spivey does a lot of work in his research and connects many of the dots together. The police may well have Spivey's computers as a go to on how to compile evidence on the assorted perverts of which there are many.
Looking at all the connections I would be very surprised if only old Philip was a pervert. Prince Charles has bad luck with many of his valets who all seem to die off very quickly. It's better than Philip's former PA who is now being charged with paedophilia. Or Andrew who hangs out with paedophiles. These are very strange people. Most of this is covered in the mainstream media.