Printable View
controversial fight last night, 3 judges way off, here is how the media scored the fight along with my full card.
Arthur Abraham’s wide points win over Paul Smith puzzles boxing media | Boxing News - boxing news, results, rankings, schedules since 1909
comments welcome and how did you score the fight??
what do you think should and will happen to the judges??
I had it 115-114 scoring one round level. Nothing will happen the judges, nothing ever does. Most likely they got what they were paid to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
Judges need shooting.
Hey fella how are ya?
I scored it 115-113 Smith.
I would have had no issue with a 115-113 either way or a draw, but the scoring was a disaster!
That just shows all the "robbery" talk is nonsense. Makes me laugh that people in the media cry "robbery" then reveal they scored in a draw (lol). It's just unfair looking scorecards.
I checked that Spanish judges record on boxrec, he's worked on loads of British shows, so not sure why they were complaining about his past shitness. Should have booted him beforehand if they were worried
yep read that Mr Laguna was the guy that scored for Rose vs Maciel 117-111
i dont generally score fights but i thought abraham had edged it and before the scores were read out i would have put my house and kids on abraham getting it
thing is if the judges are paid to let AA win then it doesnt matter if they score it by a round or by 12 rounds does it? so why score it so wide when it would have been much more convincing to score it tight in that situation, then there would be less chance of people crying about it
know what i mean?
if you dont i cant be arsed reexplaining myself