Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather - Boxing News
People hate Khan because he says dumb things like this. Floyd's resume is much better than Khan's and he has 3 losses on his record. Prescott was also a cherry pick to keep his record going, and he got flattened in a round. I'm on the fence about Khan but he's been cherry picking soft punchers for the last few years to try and keep a Mayweather shot alive. If you're going to goad Floyd, use something with a bit of truth in it.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Guys that beat Khan - Prescott, Garcia, Peterson - Floyd would have obliterated.
Khan's a great one to talk about cherry picking. His last fight was against a guy coming off a brutal beating at the hands of Pac... and he gave Khan a very tough fight!
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
The way I see it; Kahn is a player and a player-hater. That's the lame part of it.
Delusion in boxing is fine but it doesn't mix well with obsession. Kahn needs to focus on Khan before Khan goes full blown loopy with it.
Me, myself; I won't call Floyd a cherry picker but he has 'managed' his career exceptionally well.
Lotta subtext there ;D
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Khan may have still been knocked out a few times if he literally picked cherries for a living.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Khan has not got the fight with Floyd so now he is not bothering being diplomatic and just throwing the toys out of his pram.
Good for him.
Now watch if Brooks says a derogatory comment about Khan, Amir will not fight him claiming he is being disrespected.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"
The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Khan said that "the legitimacy of your opponents is what matters".
Oh, you mean like ancient Collazo, ancient Barrera, ancient Diaz, Alexander who had already lost to Porter and Bradley, and had gifts over Matthysse and Kotelnik, and Algieri, who got floored six times by Pacquiao?
Floyd's resume absolutely SHITS on Khan's.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"
The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent
Nice!
So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.
I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"
The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent
Nice!
So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.
I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.
Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there. :)
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there. :)
Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there. :)
Yeah but come on now,
Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.
Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so. And although I'm not in the States, I don't believe he's really that highly thought of there either.
I did say a long time ago, Khan isn't going to get the Mayweather fight , so he might as well just abuse Mayweather at every opportunity, and it might just get in people's heads.
But his character assassination has started way too late, and now he just looks like a whinging twat!
Khan doesn't really believe any of this shit and he's a cock really. Deep down , Khan is now worried about who he fights next, because he can't keep avoiding punchers and top fighters in the division. Exactly who will he fight?
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
What really bugs me about Khan is that he keeps insisting that he's a big draw, and on Floyd and Manny's level, in spite of OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VG_Addict
What really bugs me about Khan is that he keeps insisting that he's a big draw, and on Floyd and Manny's level, in spite of OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.
Any good boxer could have the bogus undefeated record Mayweather has IF! they had NSAC/Vegas 100% behind them like Floyd has had
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C.J.Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VG_Addict
What really bugs me about Khan is that he keeps insisting that he's a big draw, and on Floyd and Manny's level, in spite of OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.
Any good boxer could have the bogus undefeated record Mayweather has IF! they had NSAC/Vegas 100% behind them like Floyd has had
Any good boxer? What about the many Floyd has beaten without needing any help, which surely even your dumb ass could admit is the case....
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
When they announced Berto, even PBF fans musta been like
"Jesus man it is hard enough to defend you."
Fuck Floyd, never has such a good fighter been hated so much.
The thing is he could probably beat someone much better, which makes it look so much worse.
Like if his limit was someone in Bertos class then it would be fine but he JUST beat Pacman then has a massive drop in class.
