Yep he did it.. I dont even get no satisfaction watching broner get beat.. it would be so fun to see floyd get fucked up by somebody.
Thoughts?
Printable View
Yep he did it.. I dont even get no satisfaction watching broner get beat.. it would be so fun to see floyd get fucked up by somebody.
Thoughts?
I have no idea what you're trying to say. Can you re-post your thoughts in a coherent manner please?!Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
Floyd gave many belts away.
This isnt the first.
Stop blaming floyd.
This is arums fault.
Floyd isn't going to play games with anyone when it comes to control of his career.
Floyd is doing very will by himself, meaning he does not need Arum or Sulaiman.
I know titles mean nothing and he is still the best welterweight in the world but why do this?
Quack
This again clearly Proves that Manny is ducking Floyd because of testing....he underhandedly got himself installed as number 1 contender so Floyd would have no choice but to drop the title....fucking scandalous....Pac fans must be seriously embarrassed with this news coming out :rolleyes:
This pac vs floyd stuff is killing me.
Pac needs to avenge his losses to bradley and marquez before even thinking about floyd.
With marquez being 40 yrs old, perhaps pac might beat him this time if his legs dont cramp and ariza is back in his corner.
Would pac even beat broner?!!
Or khan?
He's won and dropped the WBC WW title 4 or 5 times already.
Why should he have to rematch anyone to get the Floyd fight? If one applied that logic across the board there are plenty of fights that would never have happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Should Khan not have to fight a few rematches?
Floyd doesn't like to be dictated to, he likes to pick his own opponents who make him the most money rather being made to fight mandatories.. Just look at Klitchko being ordered to fight Lepai.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo-Bo24
I went on a bit of a tangent on this topic in another thread after ignoring it for the most part but when you step back and have a fresh look, the ubiquitous Arum molecule does not work anymore and especially at this stage. Would he even miss with the right hand? Maybe that's it. Floyd knows that he would most likely be ridiculed after beating him and accused of waiting him out or hand picking him. It just seems so ridiculous to tell a guy like Manny that he has to rematch somebody or beat somebody else in order to get a fight given the history of the man. Its almost a sucker punch to the entire sport. Its as lame as making a fight based on the others ppv numbers.
Probably because they are all top rank fighters and bob likes to keep the money inhouse so its more than likey they will rematch each other!Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuitWhy should he have to rematch anyone to get the Floyd fight? If one applied that logic across the board there are plenty of fights that would never have happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Should Khan not have to fight a few rematches?
Just look at the amount of excuses from both sides since manny beat oscar.
It was the weight, the drug test stuff, the money, etc
Arent you just tired with all of this?!!
But guess what, undortunately floyd is the face of boxing and makes the most money so it actually is down for pac and his team to comply to whatever mayweather wants.
Lets say if pac beat and ko bradley AND marquez in 2014. He would be in the best position possible..BUT imho it still wouldnt make any difference because bob and floyd cant do business!!!
Its typical Floyd. He fights the lowest risk fighters. Has he ever fought an elite fighter in his prime? Canelo is probably the closest to it and to call him elite is very much a stretch.
Floyd hasnt fought anyone in his prime. In fact, he got to this position because the majority of the boxing world thinks hes crap, with no skill and cherry picks.
Who should his last three opponents have been excluding top rank fighters?
Please tell..
Did I say I think he is crap? I think he's one of the best fighters ever, it's just a shame we won't know how good because of his cherry picking of opponents.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Sergio Martinez at light middle. It's amazing he'll fight certain guys at certain weights and completely avoid other top P4P fighters.
I doubt Mayweather's decision to drop a belt has anything to do with any other fighter. Most likely the reason for dropping the belt has to do with sanctioning fees. Any sanctioning body should have fixed fees and never a percentage. If the WBC is using percentages to figure the sanctioning fee, then I can certainly understand why Mayweather would drop the belt.
3% of $1,000 = $30.00
3% of $1,000,000 = $30,000
3% of 22,000,000 = $660,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeDid I say I think he is crap? I think he's one of the best fighters ever, it's just a shame we won't know how good because of his cherry picking of opponents.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Sergio Martinez at light middle. It's amazing he'll fight certain guys at certain weights and completely avoid other top P4P fighters.
Trouble here is Martinez and Pacquiao are probably just as far over the hill as anyone Floyd has fought in years, perhaps aside from Shane Mosley. I'd love to see either fight made even still, but to suggest Floyd would get more credit in beating those guys than he has anyone else is dumb, you could easily call either of those cherry picks as well after the fact.
Yes now, but not 4 years ago when he fought Marquez at 144 and came in 146. Then he fights a shot Mosely. Again he is clearly a class fighter but he hand picks the easiest fights he can get away with. Anyone think he will fight Lara after Lara looked so good against Trout? Why not fight GGG at light middle?Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pkingQuote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeDid I say I think he is crap? I think he's one of the best fighters ever, it's just a shame we won't know how good because of his cherry picking of opponents.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Sergio Martinez at light middle. It's amazing he'll fight certain guys at certain weights and completely avoid other top P4P fighters.
Trouble here is Martinez and Pacquiao are probably just as far over the hill as anyone Floyd has fought in years, perhaps aside from Shane Mosley. I'd love to see either fight made even still, but to suggest Floyd would get more credit in beating those guys than he has anyone else is dumb, you could easily call either of those cherry picks as well after the fact.
Yeah I hear you, just saying. Obviously Marquez was still pretty damn good at that point, Floyd just didn't let him show it. Mosley was coming off the Margarito fight and nobody was calling him shot beforehand. If Floyd did fight Manny or Martinez today and beat them, those guys would be even easier to discredit after the fact, that was my point. I agree with you on Lara, that's realistically the biggest challenge for Floyd by a mile imo and it will never happen between the style and low profile of the Cuban. Could Golovkin even make 154, has he expressed any interest in doing so? Thats a guy who needs to ramp up his opposition in a big way himself.
People will always so "Ohhh Floyd cherry picked, never fought anyone good, ect". But to me, this is just revisionist history.
Arturo Gatti. Sure, in hindsight, he went to shit shortly after he was destroyed by Floyd. But what people forget is that at the time, ARTURO GATTI WAS RANKED #1 AT 140 BY RING MAGAZINE (only under Kostya Tzsyu, who was the undisputed champ). Arturo Gatti was, at the time, enjoying a career revitalization under new trainer Buddy Mcgirt.
Shane Mosley, same thing. Yeah he went to shit after Floyd beat him, but he was experiencing a HUGE career revitalization after DESTROYING consensus #1 WW Margarito in a career performance that had him looking like the Mosley of old. When Floyd fought Mosley, he was the WW champ, and he was ranked higher than he had been in previous 10 years!
People say "ohhh, Floyd cherry picked Mosley when he was old and washed up. WHAT? So when was he supposed to fight Mosley? In 2005-2008, when people were calling for Mosley to retire after getting schooled 4 times by Vernon Forrest and Winky Wright, and getting a gift over Oscar in the middle of those schoolings? When he was looking mediocre in comeback fights against Cruz and Estrada, which did nothing but confirm to the boxing public that Mosley was washed up?
The fact is, when Floyd fought Mosley in 2010, Shane was the most highly ranked and regarded he had been since 2001, before he got destroyed by Vernon Forrest twice.
It was Floyd himself who said part of his greatness comes from his cherry picking. He said it during one of those all access things leading up to the Canelo fight.
I think a Floyd v Pac fight might still happen. Mayweather Sr. was talking about how easily Floyd would beat Manny now. I don't think Floyd is the type of guy who says I made enough money. A Pac v Floyd fight would probably be the richest fight in history. People say Manny has no bargaining power anymore, bullshit, he has his fan base. Who else has the following Pac man does, Khan, give me a break. There is just too much money for a guy named money to leave on the table
Not only the fees, he does not want anyone,even partially, in control of what he does. Arum and Suleiman are both control freaks with angles up their sleeves we haven't seen yet and tentacles reaching everywhere. In other words they are first class pricks.Quote:
Originally Posted by fan johnny
Didn't always feel that way about Arum but have come to see the light.
Yeah true, and I think that's been made evident by the fact that Floyd has won the same WBC WW belt four times and hasn't defended it once.Quote:
Originally Posted by beenKOed
Beat Baldomir for it, dropped it.
Beat Hatton for it, dropped it.
Beat Ortiz for it, dropped it.
Now he's beaten Guerrero for it and dropped it.
He's never held onto it. It would have been amazing if he DIDN'T drop it.
No he shouldn't have fought Mosely at all. He shouldn't have fought a 39 year old future hall of gamer who hadn't fought in over a year. I'm not saying he's fighting bums, he's fighting very good fighters consistently, which is more then a lot of other champs do but if you compare him against other greats who u put in the top 10 fighters of all time he falls short for me because he lacks wins against elite fighters in their primes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
That's revisionist history, because I can't remember ANYBODY complaining about Floyd fighting Shane in the lead up to the fight. I challenge you to find a boxing columnist or "expert" who said "this fight is a farce, Shane is too old, ect". Hell, I challenge you to find one Saddoboxing poster who said that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Shane wasn't too old until he got dominated. Before that, people were excited that finally Floyd was fighting someone with a lot of speed and power. But if you can bring up some of your old posts where you were telling everyone the fight was a farce, I'll give you credit.
Very few of Floyd's opponents get criticized or given no chance going it, with notable exceptions going to Zab Judah for coming off a loss, Baldomir, and JMM for being too small (all legit criticism).
Lacks wins against elite fighters in their primes? Well name your top 10 who you believe fought better overall opposition than Floyd.
Lol Mosley was coming off 1 of his biggest wins. Apart from Judah who else has floyd fought that was not coming off a big win and in form ? If anything it's pacman who cherry picks he likes to fight people coming off losesQuote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeYes now, but not 4 years ago when he fought Marquez at 144 and came in 146. Then he fights a shot Mosely. Again he is clearly a class fighter but he hand picks the easiest fights he can get away with. Anyone think he will fight Lara after Lara looked so good against Trout? Why not fight GGG at light middle?Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pkingQuote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeDid I say I think he is crap? I think he's one of the best fighters ever, it's just a shame we won't know how good because of his cherry picking of opponents.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Sergio Martinez at light middle. It's amazing he'll fight certain guys at certain weights and completely avoid other top P4P fighters.
Trouble here is Martinez and Pacquiao are probably just as far over the hill as anyone Floyd has fought in years, perhaps aside from Shane Mosley. I'd love to see either fight made even still, but to suggest Floyd would get more credit in beating those guys than he has anyone else is dumb, you could easily call either of those cherry picks as well after the fact.
I have to agree with be an flicker, as much as I loath Floyd he is the best welterweight at the moment and has beaten everyone that was realitically available at the time.
Roberto Duran fought and beat a prime Ray Leonard.
Lennox Lewis fought and beat a prime Vitali
Joe Calzaghe fought and beat a prime Lacy and Kesseler
Ray Leonard beat a prime Hearns
Roy Jones beat a prime James Toney
Rigondeaux fought an beat a prime Donaire
Marvin Hagler beat a prime Hearns
Andre Ward beat a prime Froch
Barrera fought a prime Morales and prime Naz
Martinez fighting a prime Williams
Hopkins fighting a prime Pavlik.
Above are examples of career defining fights. If you are saying Fliyds best win if against a 39 year old fighter, who had 5 losses at the time who went 1-3-1 in his next 5 fights it says a lot about his legacy.
Again I'm not saying he's not a great fighter. It's just a shame he refuses to fight fighters that people give a chance against. Just to show the chances bookies gave him
Opened a 1/4 fav v Canelo (80% chance of winning) this went off bigger with money coming for Canelo.
Opened 1/12 v Guerrero (92% chance of winning)
Opened 1/8 v Cotto (88% chance of winning)
Opened 1/10 v Ortiz (90% chance of winning)
Priced around 1/8 to beat Khan (88% chance of winning)
None of the above are competitive.
He fought a prime Corrales and Castillo. He wanted to fight Shane way back when...but Shane refused...that is a FACT. Arguing resumes is tricky. Floyd is in a position where he has freedom about who he fights...that is a position ANY fighter would love to be in. He earned that. He just fought a young, upcoming superstar that was the bigger man...a fight A LOT of people thought would be competitive. And please lets not forget that he offered Pac the fight a few years back...but Pac refused because of drug testing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
1. I never asked for everyone who beat an elite prime fighter. Floyd has beaten several elite prime fighters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
I asked for a guy who you feel has consistently fought better opposition than Floyd.
2. Vegas odds are irrelevant. Why? Because they don't speak to how shitty Floyd's opposition is, they speak to how highly regarded Floyd Mayweather is.
Name me a fighter at 154 or below RIGHT NOW that Floyd would be an underdog against?
So Floyd sucks because oddsmakers think he'll beat the guys he's matched against?
I've seen a lot of crazy arguments in my many years of posting on boxing/MMA boards, but I've NEVER seen a guy use sportsbook odds to slag a guy's overall opposition. That's a new one on me.
So we can say, with confidence, that Floyd is not dodging Manny. Some of us can anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanflickerYeah true, and I think that's been made evident by the fact that Floyd has won the same WBC WW belt four times and hasn't defended it once.Quote:
Originally Posted by beenKOed
Beat Baldomir for it, dropped it.
Beat Hatton for it, dropped it.
Beat Ortiz for it, dropped it.
Now he's beaten Guerrero for it and dropped it.
He's never held onto it. It would have been amazing if he DIDN'T drop it.
World Boxing News - WBC: Floyd Mayweather still in possession of both title belts
Floyds not dropped the belt.
Both Lara and GGG at 154 would be more competitive then the above and Bradley at 147. Pac was 5/4 to beat him a few years back. The prime elite fighters he has beaten is Hatton and Castillo. Im also hard pushed to call either elite but Im sure a lot of people will.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker1. I never asked for everyone who beat an elite prime fighter. Floyd has beaten several elite prime fighters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
I asked for a guy who you feel has consistently fought better opposition than Floyd.
2. Vegas odds are irrelevant. Why? Because they don't speak to how shitty Floyd's opposition is, they speak to how highly regarded Floyd Mayweather is.
Name me a fighter at 154 or below RIGHT NOW that Floyd would be an underdog against?
So Floyd sucks because oddsmakers think he'll beat the guys he's matched against?
I've seen a lot of crazy arguments in my many years of posting on boxing/MMA boards, but I've NEVER seen a guy use sportsbook odds to slag a guy's overall opposition. That's a new one on me.
Hatton wasn't elite? LOL. What about Corrales?Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
So why is it Floyd's responsibility to fight a guy in GGG who's 2 weightclasses above him? And who even says that GGG would agree to come down to 154? And of course if he did and Floyd beat him, all you haters would have to say is that GGG was weight drained and Floyd is a sissy for not fighting him at 160.
You think Floyd would be an underdog if he went up against Lara? Are you kidding me? 19-1 Lara?
Somewhere in the back of your mind, you have to realize you're coming off as rediculous.
GGG said he'd take the fight at 154. But u see Floud is selective who and when he'll fight at 154.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanflickerHatton wasn't elite? LOL. What about Corrales?Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
So why is it Floyd's responsibility to fight a guy in GGG who's 2 weightclasses above him? And who even says that GGG would agree to come down to 154? And of course if he did and Floyd beat him, all you haters would have to say is that GGG was weight drained and Floyd is a sissy for not fighting him at 160.
You think Floyd would be an underdog if he went up against Lara? Are you kidding me? 19-1 Lara?
Somewhere in the back of your mind, you have to realize you're coming off as rediculous.
I didn't say Lara would be fav. But have u got a lot of money to tie up? I'll have a grand on Lara at 19/1 with you should a fight with Mayweather happen.
I'm not saying Lara isn't a tough challenge for him. I think of anyone 154 or below, Lara has the best chance to beat him.
But you're talking Vegas odds. They're not going to put Lara as the favorite.
BTW I like how Froch gets listed as an elite fighter, but not Hatton.
I think the members of Saddo's are getting more and more stupid by the month...
To ask a guy who started out at lightweight to fight a middleweight when there's competition still at welter is a bit silly gents.