ODH WON THAT FIGHT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by southakron314

Yeah any blind man would agree that Oscar won.

---

yes beacause he wouldhear the crowd everytime delhoya farted they aplaud him ......... any man whose not blind sees that mayweather won

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree.  I had Oscar ahead.  That said, he faded in the championship rounds.  Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight).  Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it.  I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision.  We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation.  The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter.  Not that he needed to.  Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.

---

:appl: ICB you summed it all up right there  :coolclick:#842  People get excited with a few jabs and horseshit flurries that never land... Of course people dont talk about how Oscar got rocked a few times either, but Floyd didnt... Floyd won Oscar didnt lose it   

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JT Rock

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree. I had Oscar ahead. That said, he faded in the championship rounds. Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight). Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it. I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision. We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation. The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter. Not that he needed to. Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.

---

:appl: ICB you summed it all up right there :coolclick:#842 People get excited with a few jabs and horseshit flurries that never land... Of course people dont talk about how Oscar got rocked a few times either, but Floyd didnt... Floyd won Oscar didnt lose it

---

:coolclick: back bro totally agree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thiis reminds me fo SSM II fight.. :(

---

Your judgement is not what it used to be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brazilianbomber

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thiis reminds me fo SSM II fight.. :(

---

Your judgement is not what it used to be.

---

Thats when he had a few too many bro ;D

I really wanted DLH to win but IMO Floyd won 115-114. I would have accepted a draw but I don't think Oscar won!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree. I had Oscar ahead. That said, he faded in the championship rounds. Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight). Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it. I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision. We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation. The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter. Not that he needed to. Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.

---

Prime De La Hoya beats Mayweather EASILY!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree. I had Oscar ahead. That said, he faded in the championship rounds. Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight). Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it. I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision. We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation. The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter. Not that he needed to. Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.

---

Prime De La Hoya beats Mayweather EASILY!

---

Just like prime Oscar beat Quartey and a shot Whitaker all easy please give me a break Oscar was never great fighter a very good one ?? definetly but not great and i don't get where people get prime Oscar beats Mayweather easy its just nonsense.

Actually a blind man would see that Floyds jab was 20 inches short of landing....

If you count floyd's jab hitting the air well then maybe floyd did win....

You can see who clearly won the fight by looking at both of floyd's closed eyes after the fight......

Oscar looked like he went for a jog and his face got a lil red.......while floyds eyes were half way shut.

I seen that fight about six times and PBF won all six, Guys Oscar didn't do enough to win.... He even admitted to it in one of the replay interviews, Why can't you guys? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree. I had Oscar ahead. That said, he faded in the championship rounds. Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight). Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it. I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision. We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation. The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter. Not that he needed to. Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.

---

Prime De La Hoya beats Mayweather EASILY!

---

Just like prime Oscar beat Quartey and a shot Whitaker all easy please give me a break Oscar was never great fighter a very good one ?? definetly but not great and i don't get where people get prime Oscar beats Mayweather easy its just nonsense.

---

Not nonsense if you think about it. Prime DLH would jab him to death and block everything Floyd would throw. I was very impressed a 34 year old Oscar was jabbing effectively ( until he stopped in the 9th ) and was also blocking a good amount of Floyd's shots. Also, prime Oscar would be a lot faster than the one on May 5th, 2007.

And yes...just like prime Oscar beat Quartey! That was a FIGHT! Quartey KOed Oscar in that one...wow! Damn I have to see it again!!!!! And yes Quartey probably won BUT how about DLH vs Mosley 2? How about DLH vs Trinidad? PURE ROBBERY. If you would look up Robbery in a dictionary it would give one definition and then under the 2nd definition it would also say " See DLH vs. Trinidad ".

I watched the fight again yesterday and as much as I wanted OLDH to win and as much as I dont like PBF I think PBF definitely won the fight especially the later rounds when Oscar stopped throwing his jab. All Oscars combinations just seemed to be either slipped by Floyd or blocked with his gloves. Floyd has definitely earned alot of respect off me for his performance even if he didnt throw many combinations and was a bit defensive at times and big respect goes to Oscar as well who I thought gave a good account of himself although it still annoys me that he stopped using the jab in the later rounds.

It was a really boring fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times

I'm inclined to agree. I had Oscar ahead. That said, he faded in the championship rounds. Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight). Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it. I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision. We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation. The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter. Not that he needed to. Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.

---

yes, yes and yes. Welcome back Clydey.