That is part of my discussion on evolution. But evolutionists are sure it was just a chance occurrence of amino acids etc coming together kind of like a tornado going through a junk yard and assembling a Boeing 747
Printable View
That is part of my discussion on evolution. But evolutionists are sure it was just a chance occurrence of amino acids etc coming together kind of like a tornado going through a junk yard and assembling a Boeing 747
So where's your proof that God created the universe?Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
No, now you are misrepresenting the view. Many postulations are there, from atmospheric conditions, to cosmological interference such as an asteroid, or simply by chance. The theory points to an abiogenisis moment, but we can not know the means.......what caused life. It exists because it fits the model.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
and what model is that. Are there opposing models. Does the model you mention explain RNA and DNA which are a species directions. Was that created by atmospheric interference. prior you said it can't be known now a model explains it
I am well familiar with DNA and rDNA I did take high school biology. What I said was we can not know what started life on earth. We can come up with ideas that fit the model, but we can not provide evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
The theory of evolution says it proves it. I disagree
The theory of evolution says it exists, but can not define it with certainty other than "it must have happened" we can not know what caused life and the theory of evolution doesn't claim to. As I said there are ways the are posited, but nothing that is confirmed to the point we can say this is definitely the way it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
We can not know.
I believe in spiritual parents. God being the father and Nature the mother. I believe in faith and luck, positioning and relocating, i believe in life of my surroundings and everything working in gear determining scenarios. Most importantly, I believe in myself!
You need to go back and review evolutionQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepThe theory of evolution says it exists, but can not define it with certainty other than "it must have happened" we can not know what caused life and the theory of evolution doesn't claim to. As I said there are ways the are posited, but nothing that is confirmed to the point we can say this is definitely the way it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
We can not know.
Actually I don't, you need to reassess your understanding of the theory because your understanding is flawed.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusYou need to go back and review evolutionQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepThe theory of evolution says it exists, but can not define it with certainty other than "it must have happened" we can not know what caused life and the theory of evolution doesn't claim to. As I said there are ways the are posited, but nothing that is confirmed to the point we can say this is definitely the way it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
We can not know.
Negative, evolution believes a single cell creature came about by some kind of chance, experienced thousands of mutations and through natural selection created all the beings that have been on the planet. I'm just saying the evidence isn't there.
I explained it's part in the theory of evolution to you, but you jumped to a conclusion again. If you do not believe there is evidence to support evolution, what you would call macroevolution, what is the theory you are subscribing to?Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
Microevolution has been observed within a species. It might happen at the Macrolevel but not one species evolving into another. This all started when someone posted evolution was a fact. Too much science is still not out there. As far as other options we haven't discussed that yet. Would you care to start.Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheepI explained it's part in the theory of evolution to you, but you jumped to a conclusion again. If you do not believe there is evidence to support evolution, what you would call macroevolution, what is the theory you are subscribing to?Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
I would love to hear you to say what the theory is that you subscribe to. Seeing as how you can't scientifically justify evolution in your mind, using observable documented evidence what is the theory you subscribe to?Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusMicroevolution has been observed within a species. It might happen at the Macrolevel but not one species evolving into another. This all started when someone posted evolution was a fact. Too much science is still not out there. As far as other options we haven't discussed that yet. Would you care to start.Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheepI explained it's part in the theory of evolution to you, but you jumped to a conclusion again. If you do not believe there is evidence to support evolution, what you would call macroevolution, what is the theory you are subscribing to?Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
Some believe.
Some dont.
What you gonna do?
Whatever anyone says you cant tell me you wouldnt want to live forever.
I love life and intend to enjoy every day until i return to dust but i dont want to die and i do want to live on.
Surely, you want the same?