Printable View
Oh Biden will drop out. He's flying cover (whether he knows it or not) for HRC. There will come a time when the Democrats will look to the Heavens and say "Who? Who will save us?" and Up pops ol' Hillary to lead her people to the promised land.
Watch that shit happen. I won't be shocked at all...in fact I'd be more shocked if at this point Biden is allowed to share a debate stage with Trump.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...snbc-interview
What a terrible interview. Biden seems to be charming on the surface but equipped with a rather average IQ which seems to be falling daily and is corrupt.
It is amazing what the Democrats will throw as tasteless popcorn for the masses.
to make it a partisan discussion is to miss all points. The bottom only line is it is all 1 team and you're not on it.
Are you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
Who did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
weren't you one of those pushing the numbers?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Makes sense.
Although the one funeral director made a big jump by saying it's Mayor DeBlasio who's ordering it.
So on the one hand it's apparent that the numbers are being inflated, but on the other hand you have to wonder how many of those who die at home go unreported.
I'm not so sure about the "more funding" reason, and would probably just go with "it's just easier to jot down COVID-19 as cause of death and move on to the next dead body."
BTW, figures the reporter on the street would be unmasked. ;D Goes with the "it's not that bad" narrative. ;)
On a side note, I love the New York accent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
I don't vote. You are welcome.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
who did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
what shit are you talking now? i'm asking who he voted for, i see that fear is still ruling youQuote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICwhat shit are you talking now? i'm asking who he voted for, i see that fear is still ruling youQuote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
What difference does it make who he voted for and do you not find it a bit odd for you to ask when you balk at even telling people you are living here in the UK ? Common sense and a respect for the rights for my community,family and Health workers is not fear.
I'm am happy to read what you write above. And @TIC whoever I vote for also believe the virus is real and is literally killing people out there. If you don't believe othrewise then give me your proof that all the deaths and infected people out there are NOT because of the virus. Also, the person I voted for believes the earth is round.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
How come beanerbaby and the new guy are ganging up on Ricky ticy tembo
makes no difference. i'm free to ask & he's free not to answer. i find you odd. you have no sense, you have no respect for rights, you only believe the fearpornQuote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwhat shit are you talking now? i'm asking who he voted for, i see that fear is still ruling youQuote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
What difference does it make who he voted for and do you not find it a bit odd for you to ask when you balk at even telling people you are living here in the UK ? Common sense and a respect for the rights for my community,family and Health workers is not fear.
you believe it's real, you prove it, you believe these people are dying from it, you prove it. i also believe the earth is round, tell the mods who you really are, you were a poster here before yeh? don't be a liar like beanz nowQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellI'm am happy to read what you write above. And @TIC whoever I vote for also believe the virus is real and is literally killing people out there. If you don't believe othrewise then give me your proof that all the deaths and infected people out there are NOT because of the virus. Also, the person I voted for believes the earth is round.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
I pray for you brother TIC.
don't need your prayers, just your proof. don't hide now, tell the truth, the mods know who you are so you might as well come cleanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Getting closer, but who did you vote for?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellI'm am happy to read what you write above. And @TIC whoever I vote for also believe the virus is real and is literally killing people out there. If you don't believe othrewise then give me your proof that all the deaths and infected people out there are NOT because of the virus. Also, the person I voted for believes the earth is round.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by TICwho did you vote for, please dislike this post & provide more evidence that you are a sock accountQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfWho did you vote for in the last election?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfAre you on team America? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
The meaning of it is partisan discussion I am seeing from many here are missing all points. The people are divided and conquered. The parties laugh to the bank.
That is a personal question that is surprising you'll ask me that. I didn't ask you who you vote for so don't ask me please.
Make sure the evidence is observable, measurable, testable, repeatable. Objective reality, if you can't observe or demonstrate, repeat something in this reality, then it's not reality. You will need to provide a physical practical demonstration or it never happened. ;D
What is it with this new idea that you can only be objective if you voted for who the person making the argument considers credible? It is a nonsense to reduce everything into such binary arguments and the majority of people can see that it is no more logical than believing we live on a flat earth.
Here in the UK coroners are being instructed not to blame the lack of PPE for health Workers in cases where this lack of basic protection clearly contributed to them being infected and dying. So can we all be adults and not take our cues from hysterical children like PJW and admit that things are way more completed and nuanced than can be summed up in a 280 character tweet?
Don’t worry the US will have Biden next. Macron is a big Biden fan
Mueller/DOJ prosecutor Brandon Van Grack is withdrawing as counsel for the Govt in the General Flynn case as well as a host of others. As of October 2019 Van Grack is on record before the court saying: “The govt is not in possession of Brady evidence" & The govt has not "affirmatively suppressed evidence".
The Rosenstein Memo
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...-probe-limits/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXXfu7mV...png&name=small
Whew The Logan Act used for THAT? Ooooh baby, heads are going to roll.
Dear @Kirkland Laing,
AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn’s criminal case
https://apnews.com/ae1ad252bb13490db...&utm_medium=AP
just thought you'd like to know ;)
I think that the transcripts from Schiff's investigation are being released today as well.
Seems like the tides they are turningQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
It's looking like Obama was aware of the frame up.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongSeems like the tides they are turningQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
Wait, WHAT?!?! Why I never!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by greynotsooldIt's looking like Obama was aware of the frame up.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongSeems like the tides they are turningQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
Well, I never. Kirkland, it takes a real man to come back and admit he was wrong. Man up you big girly bra!
A democratic attorney schools the great lawyer Obama on comments he said about Flynn’s dismal being unprecedented
Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
My my how the tides turn
Granted the press and Dems will now be attacking trump on the wuhan virus so they don’t need to answer to the attempted take down and lies but as we begin to see how disgusting the press and Dems acted in this Russia set up when the knew it was bullshit trumps anger to the press and Dems makes even more sense. I think Nancy and Chuck must be very happy about wuhan as they have something else to investigate and can deflect on the Russia hoax.
Did anyone see the film clip edit from an interview Catherine Harris did with attorney general Barr on nbc? It just demonstrates the media’s willingness to manipulate information to make a negative impression. It’s not reporting, it’s a daft form of entertainment but it certainly does demonstrate the media bias
Biden claims he knew “nothing” about moves to investigate Gen. Flynn but then backtracks when Stephanopoulos reminds him he was at the Oval Office meeting about it.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...sharingbuttons
The scandal free Obama administration right. Oh yeah. Well Obama always said he was going to have the most transparent administration in history. I think his promise may soon becoming true and we will find one of the most corrupt administrations in history. All Nixon wanted to do was tap one phone and look at some records. Obama threw the kitchen sink at his dirty tactics. Talking about thinking you were above the law. No wonder China got away with so much shit Obama was stuck in the Cold War days thinking Russia was the big bad enemy. What a yolk. All because Flynn dared to disagree with ObamaQuote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Trump abruptly leaves press conference after clash with reporters. The man behaves like a spoilt child. Very embarassing for anyone that voted for him.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...t-news-updates
Now Mexico is demanding an investigation of the Fast and Furious scandal. It is going to be an absolute joy watching Obama go to prison and, please oh please, the gallows. Even better will be the leftists going into convulsions saying it isn't true.
Oh but gray trump walked out of a press conference, the reporter was trying to go racial on him let’s focus on that. None of Him being set up by the press and the Dems mattersQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
CNN is pointless at this stage. Trump was right, one should ask China, but who is China answering to or being honest to with any of its information? People are dying around the world because China allowed a virus to spread around the globe. Are we supposed to ignore that or forget about that? No, rather than domestic nit picking how about ask China about their death rates, their labs, their government and stop electioneering.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusOh but gray trump walked out of a press conference, the reporter was trying to go racial on him let’s focus on that. None of Him being set up by the press and the Dems mattersQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
I thought the reporter got the answer she deserved and if Trump says 'Enough with the fake news today' then his call. I have no issue with anything he did there.
Not at all. She had some Asian in her so she wanted to make it a big deal. There is trump being racist again. Typical media left wing bullshit. Just walk away why bother. NBC and CNN got caught out and had to apologize for editing interviews with Barr, got sued by that high school kid that was being harassed by the Indian but CNN tried to portray the kid as a racist, I think he had a maga hat on I wonder if that had anything to do with it. When I was in China I watched some of their government TV news. No surprise it’s all spin. It’s unfortunate it is very similar to that in the usQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfCNN is pointless at this stage. Trump was right, one should ask China, but who is China answering to or being honest to with any of its information? People are dying around the world because China allowed a virus to spread around the globe. Are we supposed to ignore that or forget about that? No, rather than domestic nit picking how about ask China about their death rates, their labs, their government and stop electioneering.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusOh but gray trump walked out of a press conference, the reporter was trying to go racial on him let’s focus on that. None of Him being set up by the press and the Dems mattersQuote:
Originally Posted by greynotsoold
I thought the reporter got the answer she deserved and if Trump says 'Enough with the fake news today' then his call. I have no issue with anything he did there.