Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Easy money!
Levels. (Shiney belts means shit. Fact)
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
I like how everything about crawford is just so normal, no offence to them(:S) but his wife is no supermodel and just a normal person, he constantly fights in the unfashionable nebraska, he doesnt go in for the popular money money trash talk gimmick but he is clearly a very tough and dangerous guy.. He is one of my favourites, hats off to him, I think he is a genuine person and a worthy world champion !
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Who other than Spence would though? Bob has already put the huge roadblock up on that saying Spence needs to get a different promoter and make it a PPV fight before it will happen.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Unless a Mikey fight can be made next.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Capped it off now move up. Really he should already be there but I think he can go next out and save for Spence maybe Thurman he more than beats rest all things considered.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Who other than Spence would though? Bob has already put the huge roadblock up on that saying Spence needs to get a different promoter and make it a PPV fight before it will happen.
Thurman or Garcia are two names. Porter is another one. Brook would have been a good fight but I'm not sure when he can fight again.
Bob mentioned that he may fight the winner of the Pacquiao and Horn rematch which wouldn't be awful. Spence is definitely the best fight to be made though
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Unless a Mikey fight can be made next.
Agreed
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Unless a Mikey fight can be made next.
This seems a real possibility. Top Rank wants no part of Garcia/Lomachenko even though Klimas and Loma want it. Would be a way to quiet the noise.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Indongo, who is only getting this fight because he burgled two trinkets, wasn't even known a year ago, most fans have never seen him fight (just read the comments on here) yet are all excited/hyped because four silly belts are on the line.
Lets get this right - Indongo is a far bigger betting outsider than McGregor to beat Floyd. The silly Floyd mismatch is considered more competitive than the super duper shiny belts fight.
Indongo didn't look like a P4P world-conqueror beating a virtual "shot" Burns. He's a tall bloke with a rinse and repeat left hand that showed a good engine in a fight he was allowed to dominate and control.
Crawford KO within 6. (7/2)
So you big up Marriaga who has 0 good wins, is 0-3 in title fights for a fight moving up in weight. But steal the shine off a guy who is trying to do what has only been done once since the 80's and is fighting in his division. The division he has won 2 titles in traveling to his opponents home towns. Interesting completely backwards perspective.
I agree that Crawford wins though, just not within 6.
I never "bigged up" Marriaga.
My point is about FANS not fighters, there's no criticism or "shine stealing" going on.
If you understood my points you would realise the Marriaga situation is perfectly consistent with this. Belts dazzle your wide eyes but the substance behind them is all that matters. Marriaga is a better opponent than Indongo.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Teddy Atlas has Thurman as #4 p4p? Haha.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Crawford needs to fight a top guy at 147 now
Who other than Spence would though? Bob has already put the huge roadblock up on that saying Spence needs to get a different promoter and make it a PPV fight before it will happen.
Thurman or Garcia are two names. Porter is another one. Brook would have been a good fight but I'm not sure when he can fight again.
Bob mentioned that he may fight the winner of the Pacquiao and Horn rematch which wouldn't be awful. Spence is definitely the best fight to be made though
I see it as Garcia, to clear Loma's path or Pac/Horn winner. With Pac/Horn winner far more likely. Top Rank loves to pass the WBO belt around.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Just think Crawford is definitely a bridge too far for Mikey Garcia with both peaking but both rising in different weight. Crawford already struggling to make weight. Man I just want Spence v Crawford next month ;D
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Indongo, who is only getting this fight because he burgled two trinkets, wasn't even known a year ago, most fans have never seen him fight (just read the comments on here) yet are all excited/hyped because four silly belts are on the line.
Lets get this right - Indongo is a far bigger betting outsider than McGregor to beat Floyd. The silly Floyd mismatch is considered more competitive than the super duper shiny belts fight.
Indongo didn't look like a P4P world-conqueror beating a virtual "shot" Burns. He's a tall bloke with a rinse and repeat left hand that showed a good engine in a fight he was allowed to dominate and control.
Crawford KO within 6. (7/2)
So you big up Marriaga who has 0 good wins, is 0-3 in title fights for a fight moving up in weight. But steal the shine off a guy who is trying to do what has only been done once since the 80's and is fighting in his division. The division he has won 2 titles in traveling to his opponents home towns. Interesting completely backwards perspective.
I agree that Crawford wins though, just not within 6.
I never "bigged up" Marriaga.
My point is about FANS not fighters, there's no criticism or "shine stealing" going on.
If you understood my points you would realise the Marriaga situation is perfectly consistent with this. Belts dazzle your wide eyes but the substance behind them is all that matters. Marriaga is a better opponent than Indongo.
You said he "burgled" and said he "was allowed to dominate". If you don't realizing that is stealing shine, you know what. You are clearly being deceptive again. It's your thing, I get it.
Suggesting I am about belts is just more of your deception. I constantly talk about fights. Fights.
You are the one that leads people, like calling Mijey a 140 fighter when he was at 130 just a couple fights ago. He isn't a 140 fight and you know it. But, again, leading, deceiving. Read your own words. You want to not steal shine, perhaps don't say guys burgled or were allowed. Just say he kicked their asses. Like what happened, not what you want people to see.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN
This dude just traveled to every champions home to fight and Fenster wants to disrespect that, fuck that. Indongu did exactly what all fighters should do