Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Because no one else will fight him so this will force him to be mentioned as an opponent.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Because no one else will fight him so this will force him to be mentioned as an opponent.
will it fuck.
Jacobs beats Quillin, Canelo and GGG will say "so what , you beat Quillin, big fucking deal!"
Jacobs beats Murray, GGG says "who hasn't beat Murray?"
Jacobs beats Lee - so fucking what ! I was being diplomatic, Whereas your new best friend says Lee is Shit!
Jacobs needs to fucking get everywhere he can and ridicule Saunders, GGG And Canelo.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Because no one else will fight him so this will force him to be mentioned as an opponent.
will it fuck.
Jacobs beats Quillin, Canelo and GGG will say "so what , you beat Quillin, big fucking deal!"
Jacobs beats Murray, GGG says "who hasn't beat Murray?"
Jacobs beats Lee - so fucking what ! I was being diplomatic, Whereas your new best friend says Lee is Shit!
Jacobs needs to fucking get everywhere he can and ridicule Saunders, GGG And Canelo.
He can do that by being active and not being a mouthy prat. Force them to fight him as the mandatory. Stop sitting around and doing nothing.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Because no one else will fight him so this will force him to be mentioned as an opponent.
will it fuck.
Jacobs beats Quillin, Canelo and GGG will say "so what , you beat Quillin, big fucking deal!"
Jacobs beats Murray, GGG says "who hasn't beat Murray?"
Jacobs beats Lee - so fucking what ! I was being diplomatic, Whereas your new best friend says Lee is Shit!
Jacobs needs to fucking get everywhere he can and ridicule Saunders, GGG And Canelo.
What about if he beats Charlo, you said "watch him get avoided as well" if that's the case then that would be a decent name to keep him relevant, agree with the rest though, the others don't add anything to his rep or resume.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Charlo is another good name. I think he has the potential to be the best MW in the world. He is kind of the X factor in all of this. I think potentially he beats Jacobs, Canelo, and GGG, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if he lost to all three. He is a really good fighter. It all depends how well he steps it up when he fights a top guy.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Jamall Charlo?
watch him get avoided as well! they should make BJS, Canelo & GGG fight the likes of Charlo and Jacobs. Why should Jacobs have to make do with fighting stiffs like Quillin , Lee and Martin Murray ffs?
Because no one else will fight him so this will force him to be mentioned as an opponent.
will it fuck.
Jacobs beats Quillin, Canelo and GGG will say "so what , you beat Quillin, big fucking deal!"
Jacobs beats Murray, GGG says "who hasn't beat Murray?"
Jacobs beats Lee - so fucking what ! I was being diplomatic, Whereas your new best friend says Lee is Shit!
Jacobs needs to fucking get everywhere he can and ridicule Saunders, GGG And Canelo.
What about if he beats Charlo, you said "watch him get avoided as well" if that's the case then that would be a decent name to keep him relevant, agree with the rest though, the others don't add anything to his rep or resume.
This is the problem. If Jacobs fought Charlo, whoever won would get avoided.
How many times have we heard that Canelo only fought GGG after his Jacobs performance?
In @
Master's little utopia, they would fight their way into contention and become the mandatory and that would "pressure" the elite fighters into fighting them.
All well and good, but that's not the real World is it?
Nope, Charlo became mandatory and the first thingthey said was they wouldn't fight him. And if forced to fight him they said they would put it off as long as possible.
So what, Jacobs will become mandatory why? To get a fight when?
There is the Canelo rematch, then the BJS farce, probably a 3rd Canelo fight. So after that, hey guys, just become mandatory so in fall of 2019 you can have a fight.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Jacobs could help himself by getting off his arse and fighting, but no, like all the million dollar once a year fighters they're happy with the cushy little number they've got.
Spend three months a year training/fighting for a one-off million bucks, or work the whole year around, fight three/four times (the way pauper fighters like GGG had to make his name) for a combined million bucks. These guys don't want to fight.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Is Jacobs that big a draw?
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Is Jacobs that big a draw?
No, which is his big problem.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Is Jacobs that big a draw?
No, which is his big problem.
yep, cos it's more important to be a "big draw" than to win fights.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Is Jacobs that big a draw?
No, which is his big problem.
yep, cos it's more important to be a "big draw" than to win fights.
depends if money interests you or not
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Is Jacobs that big a draw?
No, which is his big problem.
yep, cos it's more important to be a "big draw" than to win fights.
You can be a big draw by getting off your arse and getting in the ring instead of commentating on canelo v GGG on twitter.