Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Bringing back Pac KO loss when he was 17 was a wrong advice for Hatton. That was a Frail, Dehydrated & inexperienced Pac. Gauge them on their recent fights.
This is just
prefight fun and an explanation of how Hatton will close the gap. I was just answering your question, no need to get defensive.
What's with "prefight fun"? This term is getting over-used here as convenient excuse for some way off postings... ;) just like "inflict the worst beating"... ;D
.
Yes, I have no idea where these terms get started.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
I think Hatton will stop Pac Hatton will be doing something Oscar didnt do and its called punching back.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
I think Hatton will stop Pac Hatton will be doing something Oscar didnt do and its called punching back.
Oh yeah, Hatton will punch back alright. But that doesn't mean he will hit Pac though.
Hatton will do what Oscar didn't do... which is KISS THE CANVAS. :cool:
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
I think Hatton will stop Pac Hatton will be doing something Oscar didnt do and its called punching back.
Oh yeah, Hatton will punch back alright. But that doesn't mean he will hit Pac though.
Hatton will do what Oscar didn't do... which is KISS THE CANVAS. :cool:
Pac is good, and his defence is improving. But he is far from unhittable. Hatton is probably going to test Pacs chin and body repeatedly. Hattons footwork is barmy and only a little bit slacker than Manny's. If Hatton closes the gap and unloads in close, it's a certainty that Pac is going to get hit. He certainly won't able to be as effective defensively as PBF was.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
I think Hatton will stop Pac Hatton will be doing something Oscar didnt do and its called punching back.
Oh yeah, Hatton will punch back alright. But that doesn't mean he will hit Pac though.
Hatton will do what Oscar didn't do... which is KISS THE CANVAS. :cool:
Pac is good, and his defence is improving. But he is far from unhittable. Hatton is probably going to test Pacs chin and body repeatedly. Hattons footwork is barmy and only a little bit slacker than Manny's. If Hatton closes the gap and unloads in close, it's a certainty that Pac is going to get hit. He certainly won't able to be as effective defensively as PBF was.
agreed pac isnt unhittable. if hatton can work on his body early and slows pac down hes fuuuuked. and at 140 i give hatton the advantage. this is not a old weight drained oscar hes fighting.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
They Basically the same size. hatton just Drink & eat a lot more in between fight.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
If these measurements are correct, Hattons shoulders are 25 inches apart, and Pacs are 17 inches..... Sounds like bullshit to me.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
Either Pac or Hatton must be a weird shaped fucker. This idea that Pac has 5 inch longer arms than Ricky seems weird t ome considering their reach is only 2 inches different.
I did some measurements on myself to see who seems more normal.
My reach is 71 inches
My arms from top of shoulder are both 25.5 inches
So gap between shoulders is 20 inches.
If your stats are correct Hattons shoulders are 25 inches. Dam thats wide, and Pacs are only 17. I cannot believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs!
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
I would imagine that many of Hattons opponents have had either height or reach advantages over him. In fact it has often suited Hattons style, and explains why he has often neglected the jab and instead just bullied his way inside using his quick feet. Against Pac who has only the slight reach advantage I imagine that Hatton will mix it up more.
I don't think anybody can seriously suggest that Hatton is not the naturally bigger man here. Pac will do everything he can to make it an outside fight, and that's because Hatton will bully him to the ropes if he doesn't. Hatton is significantly stronger IMO.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
I would imagine that many of Hattons opponents have had either height or reach advantages over him. In fact it has often suited Hattons style, and explains why he has often neglected the jab and instead just bullied his way inside using his quick feet. Against Pac who has only the slight reach advantage I imagine that Hatton will mix it up more.
I don't think anybody can seriously suggest that Hatton is not the naturally bigger man here. Pac will do everything he can to make it an outside fight, and that's because Hatton will bully him to the ropes if he doesn't. Hatton is significantly stronger IMO.
Pac's arms 5" longer. With a Straight Puncher like Pac, I don't know how Hatton deal with Straight Left & Jabs. You might counter that Hatton already deal with other longer armed fighters but I'm sure Hatton was the quicker guy in those fights. In this fight Pac has the quicker & Longer arsenal & also the Greater Chin. I don't see Hatton winning this fight.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
I would imagine that many of Hattons opponents have had either height or reach advantages over him. In fact it has often suited Hattons style, and explains why he has often neglected the jab and instead just bullied his way inside using his quick feet. Against Pac who has only the slight reach advantage I imagine that Hatton will mix it up more.
I don't think anybody can seriously suggest that Hatton is not the naturally bigger man here. Pac will do everything he can to make it an outside fight, and that's because Hatton will bully him to the ropes if he doesn't. Hatton is significantly stronger IMO.
Pac's arms 5" longer. With a Straight Puncher like Pac, I don't know how Hatton deal with Straight Left & Jabs. You might counter that Hatton already deal with other longer armed fighters but I'm sure Hatton was the quicker guy in those fights. In this fight Pac has the quicker & Longer arsenal & also the Greater Chin. I don't see Hatton winning this fight.
Have u actually looked at the measurements? They are clearly wrong. there is no way in hell Hattons shoulders are 5 inches wider than his arm length. Those measurements are bullshit!
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
Either Pac or Hatton must be a weird shaped fucker. This idea that Pac has 5 inch longer arms than Ricky seems weird t ome considering their reach is only 2 inches different.
I did some measurements on myself to see who seems more normal.
My reach is 71 inches
My arms from top of shoulder are both 25.5 inches
So gap between shoulders is 20 inches.
If your stats are correct Hattons shoulders are 25 inches. Dam thats wide, and Pacs are only 17. I cannot believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs!
Hatton's wider??? Then it means Pac has a Bigger target to aim. Pac will barely miss shot any in this fight. I project Pac to land more than 50% of his punches in this fight while Hatton to land only below 30%.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I would imagine that many of Hattons opponents have had either height or reach advantages over him. In fact it has often suited Hattons style, and explains why he has often neglected the jab and instead just bullied his way inside using his quick feet. Against Pac who has only the slight reach advantage I imagine that Hatton will mix it up more.
I don't think anybody can seriously suggest that Hatton is not the naturally bigger man here. Pac will do everything he can to make it an outside fight, and that's because Hatton will bully him to the ropes if he doesn't. Hatton is significantly stronger IMO.
Pac's arms 5" longer. With a Straight Puncher like Pac, I don't know how Hatton deal with Straight Left & Jabs. You might counter that Hatton already deal with other longer armed fighters but I'm sure Hatton was the quicker guy in those fights. In this fight Pac has the quicker & Longer arsenal & also the Greater Chin. I don't see Hatton winning this fight.
Have u actually looked at the measurements? They are clearly wrong. there is no way in hell Hattons shoulders are 5 inches wider than his arm length. Those measurements are bullshit!
Reach measurements are from the tip of the hands up to the other tip of the hands(Fingers). The better gauge is Arm's lenght which is from Armpit to end of he fist or Knuckle. You don't punch sideways or punch with your fingertips. From Knuckel to face, that's the true important measurement of Fighters advantage on landing n the face & Body.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Who's the bigger man? I think it's just evenly matched...
................................. PAC ......... Hatton .....
......................Height: 5' 6 1/2" .... 5' 6"
.......................Reach: 67" .......... 65"
................Arm Length: 25" .......... 20"
..Last Weigh-In weight: 142 lbs. .... 140 lbs.
Last Fight Night weight: 148 lbs. .... 152 lbs.
PAC is taller and with longer reach/range (big advantage for PAC here) while Hatton weigh a little bit more than PAC...
Size department is just even... I won't buy "Hatton is the bigger man at 140" argument...
.
Either Pac or Hatton must be a weird shaped fucker. This idea that Pac has 5 inch longer arms than Ricky seems weird t ome considering their reach is only 2 inches different.
I did some measurements on myself to see who seems more normal.
My reach is 71 inches
My arms from top of shoulder are both 25.5 inches
So gap between shoulders is 20 inches.
If your stats are correct Hattons shoulders are 25 inches. Dam thats wide, and Pacs are only 17. I cannot believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs!
Hatton's wider??? Then it means Pac has a Bigger target to aim. Pac will barely miss shot any in this fight. I project Pac to land more than 50% of his punches in this fight while Hatton to land only below 30%.
Hark at Mystic Meg there with her Crystal ball!
I imagine Hatton's body is somewhat wider than Pac's. That is because he is actually bigger than Pac. When that body is crushing down upon you, it isn't so easy to hit it, and it wears you down. I can see that happening a bit in my Emeralds of Enchantment. ;)
