idiot...p4p pbf is rank way higher then who? valuev ahah...another idiot who misunderstand what i said...Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Bob
Printable View
idiot...p4p pbf is rank way higher then who? valuev ahah...another idiot who misunderstand what i said...Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Bob
i think you're probably too dense to ever get this, but i'll set this straight for you one more time. you're the one who's focusing on fighters heavier than floyd--winky, specifically. you can say it as much as you want, but those two are simply not "basically at the same weight." and the fact that floyd's got a higher p4p rating now, after 2 fights at 147 (against natural 140 pounders) doesn't mean that 147's his best weight. he's lost snap from his punches, and appears to have lost a little speed. if he were to go up to 154 or 160 to fight winky (which is where that fight would have to be), he'd be even less ideal--so the fight wouldn't prove anything p4p. all i'm doing with the heavier fighters examples is pointing out the absurdity that your position reduces to. your statement, "floyd going up to a weight he has no business fighting at, and that's far from ideal for him (154/160) and losing to winky would prove that winky's better p4p," is analytically indistinguishable from the truly absurd statement, "floyd going up to a weight he has no business fighting at, and that's far from ideal for him (200+) and losing to hasim rahman would prove that rahman's better p4p."Quote:
Originally Posted by babyboNe
ok, i'm through with this now. hopefully i've broken it into small enough pieces that even someone at your level can begin to grasp this very basic point.