Re: Tommy Gallagher doesn't know a damn thing about boxing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonsmarkd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
This old poser cracks me up. He's a moron. He may have the look and the voice of a real old school trainer but not the knowledge. B4 the contender show I had never even heard of the sucker. His comments are just so off the wall and stupid, I think like Mike Tyson, he just says stupid shat to get a reaction. On a talk show a while back I remember him bein asked what he thought of a prime George Foreman and he responded like a know it all "Not too much...". Tonight on FNF he went on to say that he and Brian Mckinny were higher class fighters than James Toney! ;D ::** After that he goes on to state that he didn't see what the big deal about Forrest vs Quartey was, saying he though Forrest won the fight EASY. :o God this guy is a freakin Loon!
not familiar with this guy, just saw him on show where he predicted Maskaev will stop Rahman again.... so I figured he was credible to I read these beat down posts..
He had a 50 50 shot at picking that, hes shit. Knows nothin, hes pure hollwood thats all i can say.
Re: Tommy Gallagher doesn't know a damn thing about boxing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snakey
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonsmarkd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
This old poser cracks me up. He's a moron. He may have the look and the voice of a real old school trainer but not the knowledge. B4 the contender show I had never even heard of the sucker. His comments are just so off the wall and stupid, I think like Mike Tyson, he just says stupid shat to get a reaction. On a talk show a while back I remember him bein asked what he thought of a prime George Foreman and he responded like a know it all "Not too much...". Tonight on FNF he went on to say that he and Brian Mckinny were higher class fighters than James Toney! ;D ::** After that he goes on to state that he didn't see what the big deal about Forrest vs Quartey was, saying he though Forrest won the fight EASY. :o God this guy is a freakin Loon!
not familiar with this guy, just saw him on show where he predicted Maskaev will stop Rahman again.... so I figured he was credible to I read these beat down posts..
He had a 50 50 shot at picking that, hes S***. Knows nothin, hes pure hollwood thats all i can say.
Yeah Sylvester insisted that somebody on the show had to look like Mickey
http://www.totalrocky.com/films/rocky/photos/mickey.jpg so they whent and dug up Tommy.
Re: Tommy Gallagher doesn't know a damn thing about boxing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snakey
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonsmarkd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
This old poser cracks me up. He's a moron. He may have the look and the voice of a real old school trainer but not the knowledge. B4 the contender show I had never even heard of the sucker. His comments are just so off the wall and stupid, I think like Mike Tyson, he just says stupid shat to get a reaction. On a talk show a while back I remember him bein asked what he thought of a prime George Foreman and he responded like a know it all "Not too much...". Tonight on FNF he went on to say that he and Brian Mckinny were higher class fighters than James Toney! ;D ::** After that he goes on to state that he didn't see what the big deal about Forrest vs Quartey was, saying he though Forrest won the fight EASY. :o God this guy is a freakin Loon!
not familiar with this guy, just saw him on show where he predicted Maskaev will stop Rahman again.... so I figured he was credible to I read these beat down posts..
He had a 50 50 shot at picking that, hes shit. Knows nothin, hes pure hollwood thats all i can say.
Yeah, exactly. I'm very surprised old Maskaev KO'd Rahman and proved my ass wrong, but he outlasted him that's all. Rahman was exhausted and Maskeav had more left and wanted it more. Gallagher also treid to say he was the ver first guy to start bringin Russian fighters over here and take credit for it. He's an assclown all the way still. The lucky pick changes nothin in my mind. ::**
Re: Tommy Gallagher doesn't know a damn thing about boxing!
I picked Oleg to win also, the thing to remember about rematches in boxing. If all things are equal the first fight the rematch will end the same way only usually faster and more impressive for the original winner. Now the exceptions to the rule is say fighter A losses the first fight because he is sick with the flu or injured in someway or is the victim of piss poor judging which is usually the case .He can win the rematch a fight that comes to mind is Fenech - Nelson I Azumah was sick with the flu and got a draw in the first fight , in the Rematch Azumah was healthy and won the rematch very impressively.
The main thing is if both fighters are at their best in the first fight , nothing should change in second fight if both fighter come in correct. i forget the exact percentage but its like 70% of the time the fighter that wins the first fight is going to win the second fight. which leaves 30 % for the other guy.. its just mathematics .
