Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by albsur2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
Lacy and Spinks winning?
Peace Man! ::**
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Oh, abraham was loosing everithing he evered faded
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
was wrightvs taylor 06? if it was then thats my pick.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
was wrightvs taylor 06? if it was then thats my pick.
that was a fight that could of gone either way not really worse decision of 2006 bro
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
Is your caps lock button broken or do you just think it adds weight to your post rather than making look like a complete idiot?
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
b
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
You must be related to Eastman or something, because at the most he won 4 rounds. It was an easy win for Abraham. Stop making a fool of yourself by arguing
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
b
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
You must be related to Eastman or something, because at the most he won 4 rounds. It was an easy win for Abraham. Stop making a fool of yourself by arguing
Agreed. Eastman was handled by Abraham.
Also...I've watched the Abraham Miranda fight over & over & over...& Miranda wasn't robbed. Abraham won that fight. That being said...I don't think that he should have been forced to continue...but he did & Miranda was throwing low & did use his head (admittedly) against Abraham.
I love Miranda's power...but he's raw & he did fight dirty.
The thing is...without the broken jaw or the controversy of the numerous points the drama wouldn't have been there...but points deducted or not...broken jaw or not...Abraham won.
As far as what I see as the worst calls of the year?
Wright vs Taylor (I was as disgusted as Wright was. Taylor seems 2 just get by with the judges help :-X )
Urango vs Rabah (It was a fwockin Rabah-ree. Heh heh heh. Bad joke ;D )
Forrest vs Quartey (Straight up...I honestly wanted to cry for Ike.)
Lacy vs Tsypko (Truly...Calzaghe has ruined Lacy...no doubt, he's mentally wasted)
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
I dont know what fight you were watching but Winky forced much of the action, and was walking forward alot. He landed alot more shots, and despite what everyone says he fought the last round, just not the last minute of it, which was fine because Taylor didnt do anything in the last round. You do have to take the title from the champ, but if he wants to keep it he needs to do something to show he wants to keep it. It wasn't a robbery though, close enough that the judges are entitled to their opinions.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by global
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
I dont know what fight you were watching but Winky forced much of the action, and was walking forward alot. He landed alot more shots, and despite what everyone says he fought the last round, just not the last minute of it, which was fine because Taylor didnt do anything in the last round. You do have to take the title from the champ, but if he wants to keep it he needs to do something to show he wants to keep it.
An Error Has Occurred!
Sorry global, wacko can't repeat a karma action without waiting 24 hours...but I owez ya another :coolclick:
Very well said. Wright won the fight...HBO gave Taylor the draw.
