Will there ever be 1 world champ per division again?

I am also pretty sure Calzaghe has more than 1 belt because before he fought Lacy he had a belt, and Lacy had a belt, and in beating Lacy he took his.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taeth

I am also pretty sure Calzaghe has more than 1 belt because before he fought Lacy he had a belt, and Lacy had a belt, and in beating Lacy he took his.

---

He had to give one of them up for not taking the mandatory defense

This is going to go on until a few brave souls with significant financial backers come up with a comprehensive business plan to lure fighters into their boxing league.

I think there should be 2 belts per division. You could have 2 champs and periodically match them up against each other.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taeth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SweetPea

I was looking thru the beltholders this morning. There was only one fighter in any division who holds more than one belt, and that's Jermain Taylor. He holds two belts at 160.

What is the biggest joke of all is that the 3 guys who are clearly the 3 best fighters in the world... Floyd, Winky, and Pac... own a combined zero belts. That tells you all you need to know about whether belts matter anymore. They mean nothing.

---

Does Mayweather not own the welterweight belts anymore?

---

I think Mosley is listed as the "interim" champion for Mayweather's one belt. Why Floyd isn't allowed one fight at 154 is beyond me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Not while Mr. Porcupine Hair is still around, with his sh*t-faced smile and his silly flag-waving.

---

aaahahahahahaaaa like it! Anyway lets get rid of these alpha crap belts and back to the way it was.