Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla
Please don't. ;D ;) Otherwise I would have to ask you to remove his Hulkness from your sig.
Good news! Let's go Sam Peter, clear out the HW division, or at least try to.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla
Please don't. ;D ;) Otherwise I would have to ask you to remove his Hulkness from your sig.
Good news! Let's go Sam Peter, clear out the HW division, or at least try to.
Wow. If this is true, the powers that be in boxing actually did the right thing :o . There's a First time for everything I guess. I'm happy for Peter, he earned the title shot and Vitali did not. I don't care about any of the emeritus bs, he hasn't fought since 2004 and in no way does he deserve an immediate title shot coming off of a nearly three year layoff. I have no problem with Vitali, he's a great fighter, and I'd bet on him to beat Peter or Maskaev, hell, he'd probably be able to beat both of them at the same time in a WWE-style handicap match; but the bottom line is the Sam Peter has earned his shot.
Peter by vicious, bowel-loosening KO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
What that other poster put was unfaithful ;)
Here you go then......http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=2826237Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
I just found that and it definitely clears things up a little more. Actually alot more.
Good News
Thanks for the link. I wasn't going to get my hopes up on the first one. But now ESPN and from the mouth of Rappaport (God I hate him) and Duva, sweet. Peter deserved it 8)
:coolclick:
Best news I've had all day!