OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

Kelley had only lost once

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO

Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated

---

Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes ;D how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone ;)


Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac.

---

Double KO!!!! ;)

heres the comparison:

naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.

pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.

both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.

naz got owned against his first elite.

pac demolished his first elite.

after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.

after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.

naz has power up until an elite.

pac has power to make the elite quit.

mab took everything naz had.

mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.

ok enough with that, no wait one more.

naz is a clown in the ring.

pac is a proven monster in the ring.

so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.

I can't help but think Naz gets some harsh critisism on here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO

Kelley had only lost once

---

cant se what this proves, kelley was not in his prime against naz.. still tough, but not an elite fighter, seems as if you are misreading, i havent stated kelley was a walk over, im saying that kelley wasnt prime, everybody knows this..

julio cesar chavez has only lost 1 before de la hoya.. this proves you can be out of prime, with only 1 loss..
me saying this proves my point as much as yours, its just i faill to se, what it in the end proves..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO

Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated

---

are you serious ??? naz power underrated? its actually overrated who did he knock out worth talking about?

pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode

Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO

Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina

---

ahahahahaha but seriously who ???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ds91

pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode

---

:coolclick:

+144

He can't be that bad he won WBO,IBF,WBC and beat the guy who was WBA but was stripped because he fought Naz Naz was a good fighter he was recognised as number 1 featherweight for 4 or 5 year

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...

---

I think a lot of it comes down to what period Hamed we are talking about. Hamed was showing more and more flaws the further his career was going. The ego grew, training habits became slack and the Hamed that fought Barrera was really a one trick pony. He could only throw 1 at a time and he was extremely ineffective. Of course Barrera fought the perfect fight, but Hamed showed little of the flair that had become his trademark. I couldnt imagine Pac fighting the style of fight against Naseem that Barrera did. Pac is more open defensively.

Its an intriguing matchup and Ive no way of picking a winner...

:coolclick:, JonesJrMayweather for an interesting thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Julius Rain

heres the comparison:

naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.

pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.

both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.

naz got owned against his first elite.

pac demolished his first elite.

after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.

after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.

naz has power up until an elite.

pac has power to make the elite quit.

mab took everything naz had.

mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.

ok enough with that, no wait one more.

naz is a clown in the ring.

pac is a proven monster in the ring.

so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.

---

nice!

SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....

Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound

Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...

Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....

Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......


































And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D