Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
I wouldn't give Brewster a lot of credit for that win
Of course not, he beat your boy  ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
it was more because of Wladimir throwing to many punches trying to finish off Brewster after he had put him down and just punching him self out
Wlad didnt come in properly prepared and conditioned well enough, and Brewster was.... It was clear cut TKO not a BS desicion, those are the the most definitive ones   
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
I think Wlad is probably weakest champ now both times he has won a title its been off the same little heavyweight Chris Byrd Wlad needs to be fighting the other champs or at least somebody better than Brock and Austin had Peter had more experiance he would'nt have got by him.
Wlad is best champ out of the champs today which isn't saying alot to be honest most of the champs from any era would rule this era with ease Tyson would ko everyone in about 2 rounds only one that would last any long is Samuel Peter Holmes would jab there heads off Ali would make them look stupid and dance around them saying *WHATS MY NAME* and Foreman would just damn right kill them like i said Wlad is an ok fighter he has some good skills but his chin is weak and Wlad was even floored by DaVarryl Williamson these Klit fans need to realize Wlad has some skills but his chin is weak and is the champ in weakest era of the hws and still hasn't dominated it yet.
:coolclick: #978  IMO A prime Holyfield would take him deep and drown him also
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Puritty stopped him in 11 he ran out of Stamina then Sanders takes him apart KO2 then Brewster stops him but again ran out of stamina TKO5 then Williamson drops him Peter drops him 3 times had he had more experiance he would have stopped him aswell. Im not convinced he's the best he's good when he forces pace or forcing the fight when he gets hit back he crumbles i don't think he has a war in him.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Holyfield now at 44 nearly 45 would give Wlad a good fight if he could fight at a good pace and get through Wlads early big shots he could perhaps tire him out and pick up the pace towards end and stop him late a good game plan and Holyfield would beat him.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
I think Wlad is probably weakest champ now both times he has won a title its been off the same little heavyweight Chris Byrd Wlad needs to be fighting the other champs or at least somebody better than Brock and Austin had Peter had more experiance he would'nt have got by him.
Wlad is best champ out of the champs today which isn't saying alot to be honest most of the champs from any era would rule this era with ease Tyson would ko everyone in about 2 rounds only one that would last any long is Samuel Peter Holmes would jab there heads off Ali would make them look stupid and dance around them saying *WHATS MY NAME* and Foreman would just damn right kill them like i said Wlad is an ok fighter he has some good skills but his chin is weak and Wlad was even floored by DaVarryl Williamson these Klit fans need to realize Wlad has some skills but his chin is weak and is the champ in weakest era of the hws and still hasn't dominated it yet.
:coolclick: #978 IMO A prime Holyfield would take him deep and drown him also
:coolclick: back and agreed.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Wlad + his older bothers chin and then i give him more of a chance to when but not much more.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
Wlad + his older bothers chin and then i give him more of a chance to when but not much more.
Yes so would i its like this.
Vitali hasn't got Wlads boxing skill.
Wlad hasn't got Vitalis chin.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Definately Mr140 if Wlad had Vitali's chin he would be a great heavyweight because he has the better skills of the 2
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Thank you for think my way Tyson because we normal don't agree on things.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Personally I think a someone with Wlad's skill and size would whoop the majority of the smaller HWs of yesteryears like Joe Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, ect. Not to say Wlad is as great as them, but a guy with the phsyical tools and skills of Wlad would be a tough fight for anyone.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Personally I think a someone with Wlad's skill and size would whoop the majority of the smaller HWs of yesteryears like Joe Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, ect. Not to say Wlad is as great as them, but a guy with the phsyical tools and skills of Wlad would be a tough fight for anyone.
Maybe but he wouldn't beat Ali Holmes or Foreman Tyson ct.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Personally I think a someone with Wlad's skill and size would whoop the majority of the smaller HWs of yesteryears like Joe Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, ect. Not to say Wlad is as great as them, but a guy with the phsyical tools and skills of Wlad would be a tough fight for anyone.
Maybe but he wouldn't beat Ali Holmes or Foreman Tyson ct.
Of course... NO ONE beats Larry Holmes! ;D (not sarcasm)
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Personally I think a someone with Wlad's skill and size would whoop the majority of the smaller HWs of yesteryears like Joe Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, ect. Not to say Wlad is as great as them, but a guy with the phsyical tools and skills of Wlad would be a tough fight for anyone.
Maybe but he wouldn't beat Ali Holmes or Foreman Tyson ct.
Of course... NO ONE beats Larry Holmes! ;D (not sarcasm)
Yes boxers would beat Holmes but Wlad certainly doesn't.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
It is almost comical how people think Ali would mop the floor with Wladimir.Without ANY COMPARABLE fighter from his era to go by there is no way you can come to that conclusion.The guys Wladimir has lost to are MUCH bigger punchers than Ali except for Puritty but that was more from inexperience going 12 rounds than anything.Nobody had the physical abilities of Wladimir back then NOBODY.
Re: Wladimer isn't a great but i give him a chance against some of the greats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
It is almost comical how people think Ali would mop the floor with Wladimir.Without ANY COMPARABLE fighter from his era to go by there is no way you can come to that conclusion.The guys Wladimir has lost to are MUCH bigger punchers than Ali except for Puritty but that was more from inexperience going 12 rounds than anything.Nobody had the physical abilities of Wladimir back then NOBODY.
Forgetting Ali what about the others ??
