Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
I love Eubank but he is talking rubbish. If you have the ability to avoid defeat whislt beating the best then you are a great fighter. Losing is sometimes sheer sloppiness.
Eubank was somewhat sloppy. Calzaghe doesnt need to be tarnished by the words of Eubank ;)
Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Yeah seems like he is saying Calzaghe takes on all comers, but hasn't really proven his all around skills as a boxer to lose and comeback. Although isn't it better to win and not ever lose? But the way Eubank explains his reasons is great. I like the way he puts it all down and says why he thinks what he does. I always liked him in the ring and out.
Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
uneducated
ignorant prick
Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nium
Yeah Eubank had it all his own way for a long time, rolling in millions and keeping himself in new monocles. Then he lost, nearly went AWOL, came back and lost again and retired. If he had beaten Collins in the second fight, he'd have went on to finish his career against Benn and Jones making tonnes and, if he beat Jones, after the kick up the backside of losing, he's greatest.
Naz was in the top three or four lb4lb, if he KO's Barrera and Morales he's probably #1 and a true all-timer. But he lost, and didn't come back. And now he's looked back on as a joke!
Thing i don't like about Eubank is his gift decisions.
I liked it - held the suspense right up until the scorecards were read out.
Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nium
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nium
Yeah Eubank had it all his own way for a long time, rolling in millions and keeping himself in new monocles. Then he lost, nearly went AWOL, came back and lost again and retired. If he had beaten Collins in the second fight, he'd have went on to finish his career against Benn and Jones making tonnes and, if he beat Jones, after the kick up the backside of losing, he's greatest.
Naz was in the top three or four lb4lb, if he KO's Barrera and Morales he's probably #1 and a true all-timer. But he lost, and didn't come back. And now he's looked back on as a joke!
Thing i don't like about Eubank is his gift decisions.
I liked it - held the suspense right up until the scorecards were read out.
Well i don't.
Re: Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
Eubank is an uneducated idiot , who fought bums most of the time like Calzaghe , niether were or are great :)
You must be from the USA to be so uneducated. You know where the fearsome Gerald McClennan and the 'future of boxing ' Jeff Lacey come from!
