Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Against Castillio Hatton threw 220 punches and landed 81 over 4 rounds and won by KO.
Against Mayweather ODLH threw 587 punches and landed 122 over 12 rounds and lost a split decision.
I'm not sure what these punchstats prove, other than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter, and Castillo isn't.
Quite a lot when it SUITS. They showed how Castillo beat Floyd the first time round didnt they?
I think you're misreading my post.... I agree punchstats can prove some things, but I don't see how these stats prove that Hatton has a chance against Floyd, which is the title of this thread.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
If your not sure what they can prove, how can you be sure they prove anything?
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.
I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.
I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?
Don't worry about the thread starter we went off topic and I still dont understand your posts.
"I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"How is that misreading? Your saying two completely different things.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.
I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?
Don't worry about the thread starter we went off topic and I still dont understand your posts.
The post you were thoroughly confused by was one where I was directly responding to words typed by the thread starter. Nothing was off-topic.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
"I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Your post not mine. Im not getting into a debate I work in less than an hour. No point nit picking
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.
I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?
Don't worry about the thread starter we went off topic and I still dont understand your posts.
The post you were thoroughly confused by was one where I was directly responding to words typed by the thread starter. Nothing was off-topic.
I was not confused, your just playing with words. You totally said two completely different things and now your bringing up the initial post for backup to defend your contradictory posts. Go ahead
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Against Castillio Hatton threw 220 punches and landed 81 over 4 rounds and won by KO.
Against Mayweather ODLH threw 587 punches and landed 122 over 12 rounds and lost a split decision.
In his last fight Mayweather came very close to lossing and in some peoples eyes he did lose.
Hatton is a much better pressure fighter than ODLH is and throwes a lot more punches and works the body much better.
A lot of peole have said that Hatton would struggle with Mayweathers movement but I dont think it would be as much of a problem as some think.
Hatton wont have to look to make room for his punches as Mayweather will keep it at a distance.When Mayweather goes to the rope as he has done in his last few fights I think Hatton could do more damage than ODLH and Baldmire did put togther.He wont let Mayweather have his little rests as he normoly does on the ropes.If he goes to the ropes Hatton will make him pay for it.
Also watch for Mayweather bitching and complaining like a girl about being roughed up on the inside.
I am not saying that I think Hatton will definitaly win but I think he has a very good chance.
I just watched ODLH-Mayweather this morning and it wasn't even a close fight. Also ODLH is a lot better than Hatton.
Thats just your opinion.A lot of people more qualified than you thought it was a close fight.
Also styles makes fights.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeth
Also things you forgot to mention Pork. Dela Hoya was only landing 21% of his punches, and he has much faster hands than Hatton, but not only that but Hatton threw 220 in almost four rounds when Oscar was throwing about 200 every 4 rounds against MAyweather, this is important for three reasons
1. Castillo is much easier to get a high punch count against than against Mayweather who moves
2. Hatton lately tends to throw less as the fight progresses.
3. He wasn't getting hit by heavy rights that made even the iron chined ODLH and Baldomir think twice before just walking in on Mayweather.
If Hatton walked through Koysta shots I dont think he will be to botherd by mayweathers.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"
Do you see?
This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.
I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?
Don't worry about the thread starter we went off topic and I still dont understand your posts.
"I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"How is that misreading? Your saying two completely different things.
Are you using your brain? He said that punches stats can be used to prove things, but in this context they are invalid because its two different set of fighters in two tactically different fights.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Against Castillio Hatton threw 220 punches and landed 81 over 4 rounds and won by KO.
Against Mayweather ODLH threw 587 punches and landed 122 over 12 rounds and lost a split decision.
In his last fight Mayweather came very close to lossing and in some peoples eyes he did lose.
Hatton is a much better pressure fighter than ODLH is and throwes a lot more punches and works the body much better.
A lot of peole have said that Hatton would struggle with Mayweathers movement but I dont think it would be as much of a problem as some think.
Hatton wont have to look to make room for his punches as Mayweather will keep it at a distance.When Mayweather goes to the rope as he has done in his last few fights I think Hatton could do more damage than ODLH and Baldmire did put togther.He wont let Mayweather have his little rests as he normoly does on the ropes.If he goes to the ropes Hatton will make him pay for it.
Also watch for Mayweather bitching and complaining like a girl about being roughed up on the inside.
I am not saying that I think Hatton will definitaly win but I think he has a very good chance.
I just watched ODLH-Mayweather this morning and it wasn't even a close fight. Also ODLH is a lot better than Hatton.
Thats just your opinion.A lot of people more qualified than you thought it was a close fight.
Also styles makes fights.
A lot of people more qualified than you thought it was clearly Mayweather's favor by at least 4 rounds.
Re: Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by porkypara
Against Castillio Hatton threw 220 punches and landed 81 over 4 rounds and won by KO.
Against Mayweather ODLH threw 587 punches and landed 122 over 12 rounds and lost a split decision.
In his last fight Mayweather came very close to lossing and in some peoples eyes he did lose.
Hatton is a much better pressure fighter than ODLH is and throwes a lot more punches and works the body much better.
A lot of peole have said that Hatton would struggle with Mayweathers movement but I dont think it would be as much of a problem as some think.
Hatton wont have to look to make room for his punches as Mayweather will keep it at a distance.When Mayweather goes to the rope as he has done in his last few fights I think Hatton could do more damage than ODLH and Baldmire did put togther.He wont let Mayweather have his little rests as he normoly does on the ropes.If he goes to the ropes Hatton will make him pay for it.
Also watch for Mayweather bitching and complaining like a girl about being roughed up on the inside.
I am not saying that I think Hatton will definitaly win but I think he has a very good chance.
I just watched ODLH-Mayweather this morning and it wasn't even a close fight. Also ODLH is a lot better than Hatton.
Thats just your opinion.A lot of people more qualified than you thought it was a close fight.
Also styles makes fights.
A lot of people more qualified than you thought it was clearly Mayweather's favor by at least 4 rounds.
Thats there opinion and they are entitled to it.
Also you dont know how qualified I am do you. ???
