Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Hatton may not of broken his ribs but he certainly broke his heart. Castillo was always a little one dimensional and was ideal stylistically for Hatton to shine against. For my money Hatton beats any incarnation of Castillo and pound for pound he's the more rounded fighter with greater career achievements.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
yea he has a KO4 over a shot aged and worn Castillo, Mayweather will always have 2 UDS against a prime Castillo which at least one of was more impressive than Hattons victory
So a prime Castillo would have shrugged off that body punch and the broken ribs would not have bothered him?
Castillo ribs were never broken. It was just something made up by a Hatton groupie
I read that in a few articles after Ricky said it on TV might be false. Anyway here is a quote from Castillo himself about the body shot.
"He got me very good with that punch," said Castillo afterwards. "I have never been caught that way. It was the perfect shot. I couldn't breathe. I couldn't get up."
http://www.cnpprofessional.co.uk/blo...-blog-237.html
Thats one about the ribs
Castillo gave a short interview on Telefutro (Spanish TV) a couple of weeks after the Hatton fight saying he was okay and was undecided about his future. He said he was sore but was other wise fine. If Castillo's ribs were really broken it would of been heard about every where
Well if his ribs were broke he would be sore.......but fine otherwise ;D.
Who knows if they were broke? maybe your right we would know more about it if so.
You only have to look at the shot to figure out why he could not get to his feet. I reckon that body shot would have dropped a LOT of guys.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
certain body shots like the one hatton happened to land on castillo will take out most any fighter, doesn't matter if they're in their absolute prime or past their best.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.
You must of not seen Castillo-Corrales 1. He took some brutal shots. Including some to the body
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.
You must of not seen Castillo-Corrales 1. He took some brutal shots. Including some to the body
Seen it lots of times and no BODY SHOTS he took compares.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.
Eric Esch does.....
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
yea he has a KO4 over a shot aged and worn Castillo, Mayweather will always have 2 UDS against a prime Castillo which at least one of was more impressive than Hattons victory
I'll give you that! No doubt Castillo was great against PBF in fight 1 and the Corrales fights were incredible. Just give the Fatboy some time and he will live up to expectations.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEA
sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.
Eric Esch does.....
:shakehead:
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Does anyone yet see what I'm getting at with this thread.
Most believe that Hatton will go after Floyd in a very similar fashion to the way Castillo did in their first fight. Many have said in other threads that Floyd has learned from that fight and is a better fighter.
Here we are having a debate on whether or not Hatton is better than the lightweight version of Castillo and the debate is split down the middle.
So my question is obvious. How will Hatton beat Floyd?
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
He will do what he does best and what has got him this far. Theres no deceptive stratagem in this one and what you see is what you get. The only question that is yet unanswered pertains to the horsepower that Hatton has at his disposal. Guile and ring craft is not really his forte and he doesn't possess the ability to execute pressure whilst remaining elusive unlike Duran against DeJesus in their third encounter.
Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight
Prime Castillo would destroy Hatton
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
Does anyone yet see what I'm getting at with this thread.
Most believe that Hatton will go after Floyd in a very similar fashion to the way Castillo did in their first fight. Many have said in other threads that Floyd has learned from that fight and is a better fighter.
Here we are having a debate on whether or not Hatton is better than the lightweight version of Castillo and the debate is split down the middle.
So my question is obvious. How will Hatton beat Floyd?
He wont.
