Julian Jackson vs Felix Trinidad Who Wins

Whoever lands first.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mayorook

No no no Tito had a very weak chin. He had heart, but no chin and a lot of his knockdowns came early. Heart is the will the to get back up, having a chin is being to take a punch and not get knocked down. He was knocked down atleast 10 times in his career maybe more. Jackson had no chin either but had the strength of a horse. He was naturally bigger than Tito to. When Julian hit Tito he would not have gotten back up. This one would be over in about 4 to 5 rounds. Not to take nothing away from Tito but this would have been ugly!

READ ME!!!!!!!!!!

---

Dude you seriously need to stop playing "Fight Night".

Felix wouldnt last 1 round with Jackson , who for me is the hardest puncher who ever lived. he was faster than felix also

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Felix wouldnt last 1 round with Jackson , who for me is the hardest puncher who ever lived. he was faster than felix also

---

Well i wouldn't go that far but i would pick Jackson in 5th round of a slugfest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

i think Tito's chin was slightly better, than Jackson's and well yea i think it would be a win for Trinidad similar to McClellan's TKO over Jackson

---

No it wouldn't Jackson was past his best when he fought Gerald and Trinidad is nothing like Gerald at all Tito gets caught early this has happened alot in his career Jackson by KO in 3 rounds or 5.

Tito best weight was at Welter but he was very destructive at Super welter too. He beat an unbeaten Vargas and Reid who both may have out boxed Julian Jackson. Remember McCallum beat Jackson so it was possible to stop him and Tito could do that. So at light middle I go for Tito and at Middle I go for ???? do not know..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Tito best weight was at Welter but he was very destructive at Super welter too. He beat an unbeaten Vargas and Reid who both may have out boxed Julian Jackson. Remember McCallum beat Jackson so it was possible to stop him and Tito could do that. So at light middle I go for Tito and at Middle I go for ???? do not know..

---

Usually i agree with you, but in this arguement we couldnt be more different. Vargas could never have outboxed Julian Jackson, nor could reid i think. To compare Reid and VARGAS to Mike McCallum in my book is near blasphemous. Vargas was a good prospect, but he is not/was not and never will be a great, he will be forgotten among the other talents of his era.

You really do not rate Vargas do you but it is a debate for another thread.

I never intended to compare Vargas and Reid to McCallum, sorry, all I was saying was Julian Jackson was beatable and Tito was good enough to do it. It would be a hell of a fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You really do not rate Vargas do you but it is a debate for another thread.

I never intended to compare Vargas and Reid to McCallum, sorry, all I was saying was Julian Jackson was beatable and Tito was good enough to do it. It would be a hell of a fight.

---

All throughout his career i hated Vargas. But grudgingly i respected him as a good fighter. However i dont rate him as a memorable or great fighter no. He showed great heart, resiliance and courage against Trinidad, but that was really his crowning glory. So i must correct myself, he may go down in history. But only as a boxer remembered for a glorious failure.

Jackson was indeed beatable, Gerald McClellan demonstrated that.
P4P tito may have beaten him. But in reality Jackson was a much bigger man.

One thing we agree on, it WOULD have been a hell of a fight!

CC well put.

Make no mistake, Jackson was a punching monster. I personally think he would have over powered Tito and end it within three rounds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

This would be slugfest i doubt it would go 5 rounds i think Jackson can ko Tito early because Tito had habit of getting knocked down early and Jackson hit like a truck infact probably hardest hitting p4p fighter ever Tito is better boxer both men have weak chins i think Jackson by ko early prolly about 3 rounds maybe less once Jackson hits you clean its all over Tito has good power but not that one hit ko power Jackson has whats your opinions guys and girls ?

---

Jackson was much too powerful for Tito. Tito's aggressive style would have made Jackson's day.

Tito beat better fighters at light middle so that is why I have gone for him. If Julian Jackson landed Tito would not get up that is for sure but because he fought and beat better opposition I would just bet on Tito. Terry Norris nearly beat him and McCallum certainly did.

julian jackson by ko

at 147 & 154 there aren't many punchers I'd pick over Tito.