Printable View
It's not great but at least we don't pay for The Sopranos over here, and as for the rest of American TV, the adverts are ridiculous, it's like "Flomax, helps you pee better, side effects include lo blood pressure, dizziness, vomiting and erectile disfunction....."Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
They need to improve their analysis and commentary too i reckon.
I was really really really really pissed staying up at 5.30 for that to happen. I had Barerra winning 5-4 at the time, then final round Barrera has a deep cut and found out later he had a point deducted. When I watched it again at 7pm I had Paq winning 7-5. It was close and compelling but considering it was MAB last big fight I thought he would have gone for broke. Then again the 2 judges had crazy scoring so it would not have mattered.
Setanta is shockingly crap, even Buncy was saying the fight was getting interesting and had the look of how carp are you to expect us to talk about the 10 preceding rounds.
Sorry but i don't like Bunce on the coverage. Like his writing in Boxing Monthly, but just don't dig him as a TV man
not so much the serive mate, this is the only time in years and years and years i have seena problem...Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
now what really sucks is have fucking slater from saved by the bell doing the postfight interviews and the commentery, or jim whats, on sky or johnny nelson in the studio
I don't care about him doing the interviews but the commentary? What in the fuck!Quote:
Originally Posted by Preme
These guys commentary for Judah-Cotto fight was bias beyond belief.