Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Shane is a nice guy so no-one says anything. Anyone else,they would be hung out to dry. Imagine it being Zab! ;D
No!!!! Its because this happened 4-5 years ago and he never tested positive for a banned substance even at the time of the incident.
The only people being punished are the ones who are testing positive. You cant intelligenly punish someone in sports when they passed all the required tests.
This argument is lame because the steroids Shane took were DESIGNED to go UNDETECTED.  That's why they were taken!! 
All the people associated with Balco did not test positive for steroids because they used "designer" steroids.   
No Shiit, you dont say... If you would bother to read the other posts I made turbo, you would see the reasoning I gave  ::**
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
I take it you dont know much about designer Roids and Groth hormone do you? Just because I admitted to killing someone they wouldnt or couldn't convict me unless the evidence was conclusive and beyond a reasonable doubt... If they were testing for a basic Roid or Hormone and Shane passed the test but had other undetectable substance in his body than he passes the criteria.. You cant go back and punish him since "Technically" he passed the tests and there is no hard,concrete evidence just a confession, which again dont mean a pile of dookey unless there is conclusive evidence to go with it ;) You following me now?
so I dont understand how my arguemet is lame based on my reasoning, unless you can present something different
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwnedByPacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Shane is a nice guy so no-one says anything. Anyone else,they would be hung out to dry. Imagine it being Zab! ;D
No!!!! Its because this happened 4-5 years ago and he never tested positive for a banned substance even at the time of the incident.
The only people being punished are the ones who are testing positive. You cant intelligenly punish someone in sports when they passed all the required tests.
Mosley even took lie detector test and he passed with flying colours.
Lie detector tests don't mean squat! And JT,if Shane admitted to it,what more is there to say??
Admit what? if he was taking a banned substance than it would have shown up in the pre and post fight screening, since there was no protocol or standard devolped for designer growth hormone, there is nothing that can be done about it. Its quite simple really ;)
Shane Mosley admitted to taking a substance which was banned. So I don't really understand what your point is to be honest.
I take it you dont know much about designer Roids and Groth hormone do you? Just because I admitted to killing someone they wouldnt or couldn't convict me unless the evidence was conclusive and beyond a reasonable doubt... If they were testing for a basic Roid or Hormone and Shane passed the test but had other undetectable substance in his body than he passes the criteria.. You cant go back and punish him since "Technically" he passed the tests and there is no hard,concrete evidence just a confession, which again dont mean a pile of dookey unless there is conclusive evidence to go with it ;) You following me now?
Hello? You, my friend, have posted something with many logical fallacies. Shane confessed-that's as conclusive as you can get! Also, what's a "basic" steroid? Or a basic "hormone?" There is no such thing. A steroid is a steroid. Shane did not take a "different" steroid. It was changed chemically to pass testing. They were still steroids. Of course, we can't go back and punish him, but we can change or reassess our opinion of an athelete who, in a sport where power, speed, and stamina are necessary for success, uses sterooids to get an edge over his opponents.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Hello? You, my friend, have posted something with many logical fallacies. Shane confessed-that's as conclusive as you can get!
Really if thats the case then how come I can admit to a killing or a robbery, but I cant be convicted on that alone? I'll tell ya. UNTIL THERE IS EVIDENCE TO TIE ME TO THE CRIME, THEN AN ADMISSION OF GUILT IS NOT CONCLUSIVE ENOUGH...... THATS A FACT!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Also, what's a "basic" steroid? Or a basic "hormone?" There is no such thing. A steroid is a steroid. Shane did not take a "different" steroid.It was changed chemically to pass testing
Well now your chasing your tail on that one, if it was the same kind of steroid than it would have detected, so while you put your foot in your mouth since you agreed with my post saying it was a "designer" Steroid, so which is it a Steroid or a "Designer" Steroid? ::**
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
They were still steroids. Of course, we can't go back and punish him, but we can change or reassess our opinion of an athelete who, in a sport where power, speed, and stamina are necessary for success, uses sterooids to get an edge over his opponents.
His Character or public opinion was not called into question here its why he wasnt punished by any of the athletic commissions.... you can question him all you want thats your perogative.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwnedByPacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Shane is a nice guy so no-one says anything. Anyone else,they would be hung out to dry. Imagine it being Zab! ;D
No!!!! Its because this happened 4-5 years ago and he never tested positive for a banned substance even at the time of the incident.
The only people being punished are the ones who are testing positive. You cant intelligenly punish someone in sports when they passed all the required tests.
Mosley even took lie detector test and he passed with flying colours.
Lie detector tests don't mean squat! And JT,if Shane admitted to it,what more is there to say??
Admit what? if he was taking a banned substance than it would have shown up in the pre and post fight screening, since there was no protocol or standard devolped for designer growth hormone, there is nothing that can be done about it. Its quite simple really ;)
Shane Mosley admitted to taking a substance which was banned. So I don't really understand what your point is to be honest.
Gamo do you have a source on this? As far as I can remember he never actually admitted to knowingly taking a performance enhancing drug with the purpose getting an illigal advantage. At least in the article I read it sounded more like he followed the trainer's instructions and was not aware there was something wrong.
I, of course could be way off on this. Please let me know.
Yeah,he admitted to taking to taking it but took it unknowingly,supposedly. In the same article,he said he was "a health freak". Quite strange for a health freak to take an illegal supplement....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwnedByPacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Shane is a nice guy so no-one says anything. Anyone else,they would be hung out to dry. Imagine it being Zab! ;D
No!!!! Its because this happened 4-5 years ago and he never tested positive for a banned substance even at the time of the incident.
The only people being punished are the ones who are testing positive. You cant intelligenly punish someone in sports when they passed all the required tests.
Mosley even took lie detector test and he passed with flying colours.
Lie detector tests don't mean squat! And JT,if Shane admitted to it,what more is there to say??
Admit what? if he was taking a banned substance than it would have shown up in the pre and post fight screening, since there was no protocol or standard devolped for designer growth hormone, there is nothing that can be done about it. Its quite simple really ;)
Shane Mosley admitted to taking a substance which was banned. So I don't really understand what your point is to be honest.
I take it you dont know much about designer Roids and Groth hormone do you? Just because I admitted to killing someone they wouldnt or couldn't convict me unless the evidence was conclusive and beyond a reasonable doubt... If they were testing for a basic Roid or Hormone and Shane passed the test but had other undetectable substance in his body than he passes the criteria.. You cant go back and punish him since "Technically" he passed the tests and there is no hard,concrete evidence just a confession, which again dont mean a pile of dookey unless there is conclusive evidence to go with it ;) You following me now?
Hello? You, my friend, have posted something with many logical fallacies. Shane confessed-that's as conclusive as you can get! Also, what's a "basic" steroid? Or a basic "hormone?" There is no such thing. A steroid is a steroid. Shane did not take a "different" steroid. It was changed chemically to pass testing. They were still steroids. Of course, we can't go back and punish him, but we can change or reassess our opinion of an athelete who, in a sport where power, speed, and stamina are necessary for success, uses sterooids to get an edge over his opponents.
CC RIcan,that's what I'm trying to say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Hello? You, my friend, have posted something with many logical fallacies. Shane confessed-that's as conclusive as you can get!
Really if thats the case then how come I can admit to a killing or a robbery, but I cant be convicted on that alone? I'll tell ya. UNTIL THERE IS EVIDENCE TO TIE ME TO THE CRIME, THEN AN ADMISSION OF GUILT IS NOT CONCLUSIVE ENOUGH...... THATS A FACT!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
Also, what's a "basic" steroid? Or a basic "hormone?" There is no such thing. A steroid is a steroid. Shane did not take a "different" steroid.It was changed chemically to pass testing
Well now your chasing your tail on that one, if it was the same kind of steroid than it would have detected, so while you put your foot in your mouth since you agreed with my post saying it was a "designer" Steroid, so which is it a Steroid or a "Designer" Steroid? ::**
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican
They were still steroids. Of course, we can't go back and punish him, but we can change or reassess our opinion of an athelete who, in a sport where power, speed, and stamina are necessary for success, uses sterooids to get an edge over his opponents.
His Character or public opinion was not called into question here its why he wasnt punished by any of the athletic commissions.... you can question him all you want thats your perogative.
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Rookie Fan,the article was on ESPn about a month ago,should still be there. If not,google it.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Rookie Fan,the article was on ESPn about a month ago,should still be there. If not,google it.
If that's the one you are referring to than that's the one I saw. I might look through it again if I get the chance but all that report showed was some acusations, a statement that he was a witness in the Balco case (but no specifics on what he actually said) among other things. Nothing really clear. I also read a statement from Mosley shortly after this where he stated this was like something they were trying out. They didn't know much about it and as soon as they found out it was illigal, they stopped.
I don't know if what he sais is true or not but the fact is that there is no way for any of us to know if he deliberately and knowingly took performance enhancing drugs. Like I said, I usually give people the benefit of the doubt. I'm glad to live in a country where you are innocent till proven guilty and not the other way around.
I would like to point out that this was only done for one fight and that was the seccond DLH fight. He had already beaten DLH once and I think his legacy was well secured by then. He is still considered by most boxing fans (NOT ME) to be the first to beat DLH and that was before he allegedly started doping.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
JT, read "Game of Shadows." You will learn a lot about BALCO and what they did to steroids/HGH. Right now, I am not confident you know what you are talking about. Your last response is simply "talking in circles."
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial ::**
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
El Gamo why are you even bringing this shit up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch Ass out.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this S*** up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch a** out.
I do love Cotto AND I love Mosley as a person too!! No need for the hostility. I wasn't attacking JT nor Mosley. I was attacking JT's ARGUMENT, which is what they teach you to do in rhetoric classes. I was simply responding to JT's "logic," which did not make much sense to me in my opinion. After all, isn't what this site is all about-to express our opinions? Maybe Mosley needed steroids to compete at 154. That is a legitimate question, after all, his power seems to have become average after moving to 147-154 (less than 50% in 17 fights, 2 KO's in his last 11 fights, both against a finished Vargas).
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this shit up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch Ass out.
What's the need to start hurling insults? Why am I brining this up? Erm gee,Mosley admitted to taking a banned substance,that's why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial ::**
My being a Cotto fan has no relevance. I respect Shane, I just don't understand why he got off so lightly. I'll drop it now,but just admit Mosley is one of your favourite fighters and had it been someone you disliked,you would be jumping all over them.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this S*** up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a  damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch a** out.
What's the need to start hurling insults? Why am I brining this up? Erm gee,Mosley admitted to taking a banned substance,that's why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial  ::**
My being a Cotto fan has no relevance. I respect Shane, I just don't understand why he got off so lightly. I'll drop it now,but just admit Mosley is one of your favourite fighters and had it been someone you disliked,you would be jumping all over them.
I say this respectively
Again Gamo the fact that I am a fan of Mosely has nothing to do with my response, I dont get why you are saying that ??? I never endorsed Mosely "Cheating" whether he did it knowingly or unknowingly
Again you were not questioning his character or peoples opinion of him cheating, you asked why he didnt get reprimamndid, so like anyone else on this forum I gave an opinion based on fundamentals of basic law. I was not debating, I was not endorsing Mosely cheating, I was offering up a logical viable response based on the history of law and conclusive evidence. I did not make an excuse for Shanes actions...
Again you keep saying Shane is my boy so thats why I am in this convo, which makes no sense to me at all ??? Again one could say if Shane wasnt fighting your Boy Cotto than you would have never brought this up in the 1st place, are you already trying to damage control if Cotto loses? By saying Shane was on Roids and thats the only way he could of beat Cotto... That sounds ridiculous dosent it? Tell you what I wont insult your intelligence by insinuating that, so do me a favor dont insult my intelligence by accusing me of jaded responses cause I am a fan of the referenced fighter  ;)
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this S*** up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch a** out.
What's the need to start hurling insults? Why am I brining this up? Erm gee,Mosley admitted to taking a banned substance,that's why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial ::**
My being a Cotto fan has no relevance. I respect Shane, I just don't understand why he got off so lightly. I'll drop it now,but just admit Mosley is one of your favourite fighters and had it been someone you disliked,you would be jumping all over them.
I say this respectively
Again Gamo the fact that I am a fan of Mosely has nothing to do with my response, I dont get why you are saying that ??? I never endorsed Mosely "Cheating" whether he did it knowingly or unknowingly
Again you were not questioning his character or peoples opinion of him cheating, you asked why he didnt get reprimamndid, so like anyone else on this forum I gave an opinion based on fundamentals of basic law. I was not debating, I was not endorsing Mosely cheating, I was offering up a logical viable response based on the history of law and conclusive evidence. I did not make an excuse for Shanes actions...
Again you keep saying Shane is my boy so thats why I am in this convo, which makes no sense to me at all ??? Again one could say if Shane wasnt fighting your Boy Cotto than you would have never brought this up in the 1st place, are you already trying to damage control if Cotto loses? By saying Shane was on Roids and thats the only way he could of beat Cotto... That sounds ridiculous dosent it? Tell you what I wont insult your intelligence by insinuating that, so do me a favor dont insult my intelligence by accusing me of jaded responses cause I am a fan of the referenced fighter ;)
I'm not biased. Had this been Margarito/Cotto or any other fighter,I would have reacted the same. I can almost guarantee had this been Margarito/JC or any other fighter you disliked,you would be calling for their head. And please enlighten me,are you a lawyer? Do you know alot about law?
If Shane beats Cotto,he beats him. I don't make excuses or start calling the fighter who beat my fighter "average" or other silly terms just for the sole purpose of demeaning them. That's not my style. I'm done discussing this point,there's nothing else for me to say.
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this S*** up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch a** out.
What's the need to start hurling insults? Why am I brining this up? Erm gee,Mosley admitted to taking a banned substance,that's why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial ::**
My being a Cotto fan has no relevance. I respect Shane, I just don't understand why he got off so lightly. I'll drop it now,but just admit Mosley is one of your favourite fighters and had it been someone you disliked,you would be jumping all over them.
I say this respectively
Again Gamo the fact that I am a fan of Mosely has nothing to do with my response, I dont get why you are saying that ??? I never endorsed Mosely "Cheating" whether he did it knowingly or unknowingly
Again you were not questioning his character or peoples opinion of him cheating, you asked why he didnt get reprimamndid, so like anyone else on this forum I gave an opinion based on fundamentals of basic law. I was not debating, I was not endorsing Mosely cheating, I was offering up a logical viable response based on the history of law and conclusive evidence. I did not make an excuse for Shanes actions...
Again you keep saying Shane is my boy so thats why I am in this convo, which makes no sense to me at all ??? Again one could say if Shane wasnt fighting your Boy Cotto than you would have never brought this up in the 1st place, are you already trying to damage control if Cotto loses? By saying Shane was on Roids and thats the only way he could of beat Cotto... That sounds ridiculous dosent it? Tell you what I wont insult your intelligence by insinuating that, so do me a favor dont insult my intelligence by accusing me of jaded responses cause I am a fan of the referenced fighter ;)
I'm not biased. Had this been Margarito/Cotto or any other fighter,I would have reacted the same. I can almost guarantee had this been Margarito/JC or any other fighter you disliked,you would be calling for their head. And please enlighten me,are you a lawyer? Do you know alot about law?
If Shane beats Cotto,he beats him. I don't make excuses or start calling the fighter who beat my fighter "average" or other silly terms just for the sole purpose of demeaning them. That's not my style. I'm done discussing this point,there's nothing else for me to say.
Why are you having so much difficulty over this ??? Its not about me asking for anyones head, has 0 to do with it..
No I'm not a lawyer, IYO does that diqualify me from being able to interpret the fundamentals of law ??? this isint a tough one... We have an admission, we have a fighter that passed all the tests administered to him and declared clean at the time. outside of that you have 0 evidence, technically there is nothing to tie Shane to cheating even know we all know he did and admitted it. without concrete evidence or something substantial beyond a reasonable doubt, there is nothing anyone can do about it unfortunately... If it was Margarito or Calzaghe I would be saying the same thing. The problem is, if they try to suspend him he can counter and sue because they have 0 evidence only a clean drug test
Shane cheated against Delahoya, shame on him, if he had dirty blood or urine and they could suspend him I would be calling for his head. What if he was beating Oscar down and permanetly injured him from steroid use in that fight, its inexcusable...
Re: Interview with Sugar Shane Mosley
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorook
El Gamo why are you even bringing this S*** up. All your trying to do is discredit everything Shane did. The bottom line is Shane is a great fighter and of of the best of this era period. I respect what your saying, but i really wish people would let this go already. As for you Rican your just a damn hater and I know your a Cotto lover, and i wish i could see your face when Sugar knock Cotto's Bitch a** out.
What's the need to start hurling insults? Why am I brining this up? Erm gee,Mosley admitted to taking a banned substance,that's why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Stop over complicating the issue dude. You defend him vigorously because he's your favourite fighter,had this been someone you disliked,I doubt you would be so quick to jump in.
Who is over complicating??? I stated facts, you havent!!!! you were wondering why he wasnt punished, I gave you more than a reasonable explanation why he wasnt, you act like it was a far fetched example or something and the 2 of you are getting way off point Gamo you never questioned his character you questioned why the lack of discipline levied to Mosely.... Am I correct??
You are the one who pointed to his popularity as being a gate pass for his lack of punishment.... Like that really factors in, tell that to Michael Vick the face of the NFL and most exciting player that his popularity should have been a gate pass.... Guess what he was accused, they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So now he is awaiting sentenceing... thats how some one gets punished, so end it!!!
2nd of all Mosely isint my favorite fighter, so I dont know the point of that remark, but what makes me suspicious of your motives is that your are a Colossal Fan of Cotto so I'm sure your partial ::**
My being a Cotto fan has no relevance. I respect Shane, I just don't understand why he got off so lightly. I'll drop it now,but just admit Mosley is one of your favourite fighters and had it been someone you disliked,you would be jumping all over them.
I say this respectively
Again Gamo the fact that I am a fan of Mosely has nothing to do with my response, I dont get why you are saying that ??? I never endorsed Mosely "Cheating" whether he did it knowingly or unknowingly
Again you were not questioning his character or peoples opinion of him cheating, you asked why he didnt get reprimamndid, so like anyone else on this forum I gave an opinion based on fundamentals of basic law. I was not debating, I was not endorsing Mosely cheating, I was offering up a logical viable response based on the history of law and conclusive evidence. I did not make an excuse for Shanes actions...
Again you keep saying Shane is my boy so thats why I am in this convo, which makes no sense to me at all ??? Again one could say if Shane wasnt fighting your Boy Cotto than you would have never brought this up in the 1st place, are you already trying to damage control if Cotto loses? By saying Shane was on Roids and thats the only way he could of beat Cotto... That sounds ridiculous dosent it? Tell you what I wont insult your intelligence by insinuating that, so do me a favor dont insult my intelligence by accusing me of jaded responses cause I am a fan of the referenced fighter ;)
I'm not biased. Had this been Margarito/Cotto or any other fighter,I would have reacted the same. I can almost guarantee had this been Margarito/JC or any other fighter you disliked,you would be calling for their head. And please enlighten me,are you a lawyer? Do you know alot about law?
If Shane beats Cotto,he beats him. I don't make excuses or start calling the fighter who beat my fighter "average" or other silly terms just for the sole purpose of demeaning them. That's not my style. I'm done discussing this point,there's nothing else for me to say.
Why are you having so much difficulty over this ??? Its not about me asking for anyones head, has 0 to do with it..
No I'm not a lawyer, IYO does that diqualify me from being able to interpret the fundamentals of law ??? this isint a tough one... We have an admission, we have a fighter that passed all the tests administered to him and declared clean at the time. outside of that you have 0 evidence, technically there is nothing to tie Shane to cheating even know we all know he did and admitted it. without concrete evidence or something substantial beyond a reasonable doubt, there is nothing anyone can do about it unfortunately... If it was Margarito or Calzaghe I would be saying the same thing. The problem is, if they try to suspend him he can counter and sue because they have 0 evidence only a clean drug test
Shane cheated against Delahoya, shame on him, if he had dirty blood or urine and they could suspend him I would be calling for his head. What if he was beating Oscar down and permanetly injured him from steroid use in that fight, its inexcusable...
I concur, ;D 8)
