Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
BrazilianBomber,what the heck is wrong with you bro? IF BILLY GRAHAM AND HATTON'S FATHER ARE SAYING HATTON IS TOO SMALL FOR WW AND DON'T WANT TO SEE HIM FIGHT TOP FIGHTERS THERE,where the heck does "Oh only Floyd haters are saying Hatton is too small for WW come from? Come on bro,some common sense.
It doesn't matter who went to WW first,who has beaten the better fighters at WW?Cotto. Who has shwon he has settled into the weight more?Cotto. For all intents and purposes,Hatton could very well have been 0-2 at WW,it just so happens he squeaked a W in his fight with Collazo who is at best, a top 10 WW. So I'm not really understanding ANY of your points which have 0 logic behind them.
You qouted the post so obviously something hit home with you, you keep skimming through these Hatton threads trying to convince people that Ricky can do no damage at WW and so many people think it's bullshit. Floyd beat the guy because he was a better fighter not because he was a bigger fighter AND YOU TALK ABOUT 0 LOGIC, Floyd is a very small WW it just so happens he is very talented and can deal with the jump up, you make it seem like he was fighting Paul Williams or Antonio Margarito and that he could not deal with the size differential, I simply don't know what's wrong with your brain, after debating with you on multiple occassions in the last couple of day's it's clear you are not going to get it through your skull so I will say this for the last time
1. Who has beaten the better fighters at WW? You are telling me that Ricky Hatton can not beat Zab Judah ::** and Hatton fighting Mosley (36) would be very competitive, just like the Cotto-Mosley fight was, so to be honest I believe this is silly question, if Hatton took that road it could very well be getting fighter of the year votes, and for the record I don't think Judah could rock Hatton like he did Cotto
2. Cotto has looked like he settles into the weight better because he has not fought PBF, after he does that then tell me how natural he looks in the weight, I guarantee what happened to Hatton will happen to Cotto
3. Your bias has made me defend two fighters that I am not a fan of (PBF, Hatton), I believe PBF would beat Hatton at any possible weight that the two can fight in (140 or not) so 147 had nothing to do with it, you have made Hatton losing to the best fighter in the world a shameful thing, and I believe that is immature, ignorant, and unfair/bias
4. If it's true that Billy Graham and his father want him back at 140 it's a business decision, he can dominate 140, he will never dominate 147 as long as PBF is around, so if he has no problems making the weight you might as well stay in the division you can dominate, he has been at 140 for a while, I am pretty sure he does not have a problem filling in at 147
5. I don't know why you have such disdain for Hatton's loss to PBF but it is highly childish and need's to stop, a loss is a loss we don't need you to bring 1,000 excuses into it
