I Think Theres A Slight Chance Peter May Get Ktfo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

Klitchko grazed him about 30 times with that uppercut in the first fight. Unfortunately, it was Wlad who had to keep picking his sorry @ss up off the canvas throughout the fight

---

all i remember is jabs, straights and an occasional left hook

Sam Peter is just a current version of David Tua. Awesome power in both hands, respectable chin, and D level boxing ability. Any boxer with marginal skills has absolutely no excuse losing to him.

....his chin ain't all that....did you see that left hook get him???


Note to Wladimir Klitschko, use the left hook! A right cross, left hook combo would be the end of all things Sam Peter

Yeah, I saw the left hook get him. And I saw Peter NOT GO DOWN. If you can go thirty plus fights at heavyweight without being stopped, that's respectable, something that sadly can't be said about Chandalier Klitchko.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

Yeah, I saw the left hook get him. And I saw Peter NOT GO DOWN. If you can go thirty plus fights at heavyweight without being stopped, that's respectable, something that sadly can't be said about Chandalier Klitchko.

---

.....Wlad could have KO'd Maskaev.....and by KO I mean KNOCKOUT and but KNOCKOUT I mean have Oleg Maskaev on the canvas with eyes closed.


Sam Peter couldn't even knock him down....that's fucking sad

Of course he could have, just like he could have KO'd Corrie Sanders right? You're funny:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

Of course he could have, just like he could have KO'd Corrie Sanders right? You're funny:)

---

...it wasn't his night, he fought short and got caught.


And yet as bad as everyone says Wladimir's chin is he just whipped Sam Peter's ass.....he was down 3 times (twice from 2 questionable shots) and he was still waaaaaaaay ahead of Sam on the cards....Sam BARELY won the rounds where Wlad was down!!!

That's because, as I stated before this argument even started, no boxer with even marginal skill has any excuse losing to Peter. Face it, your boy Wlad's been knocked on his @ss more times than Jimmy Clausen of Notre Dame:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

That's because, as I stated before this argument even started, no boxer with even marginal skill has any excuse losing to Peter. Face it, your boy Wlad's been knocked on his @ss more times than Jimmy Clausen of Notre Dame:)

---

...and Wladimir has 50 wins 44 KO's and 2 of the 4 recognized titles


Oh well I guess he's tougher to beat than 50 people (including Sam Peter) once thought

I guess he's also pretty easy to knock down:)

Do you guys have to play so rough? Mr. Blonde.

Mr. White "You better start talking asshole!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

I guess he's also pretty easy to knock down:)

---

....So is Sam Peter....you know Jameel McCline didn't knock Wlad down ;)

Do you know Clifford Etienne beat Lamon Brewster:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by match

Do you know Clifford Etienne beat Lamon Brewster:)

---

When Brewster fucked his knee up.....who the fuck cares who else beat who else.

Did you know Leon Spinks lost to Johnny Carlo and Spinks beat Ali? :o


I don't give a flying fuck about Brewster, he got his ass served in the rematch and Sam Peter better watch that tape because that is the new improved Wlad that is going to pound his face into mush...better and more efficiently than the last time

The mere fact that you're even engaging in an argument about the career accomplishments of Chandalier Klitchko versus a D LEVEL FIGHTER LIKE PETER is in itself hysterical:)