Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
As it goes although the fight took place in England Woods was the "away" fighter in the 3rd bout.
It was a Frank Warren do. He helped Johnsons team win the purse bids.. Johnson-Calzaghe was being lined up.. for the 50th time.
Micky Vann scored the fight for Johnson.. the two foreigners gave it to Clinton.
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
You're wrong.
It's 1-1 with a draw. Very evenly matched fighters.
Although Clinton was a bit jammy with the first result. ;)
So even you have it 2-1 for Johnson ;)
Woods lost all 3 imo, close but Julio Gonzalez and Rico Hoye are his natural upper limits
And why has Johnson had to come over to Wood's backyrd each time. Tell me honestly if they hadn't all occurred in the US that Woods wouldnt have lost all 3.
Because Johnson aint worth two bob and his team can't win a purse bid (FW's help aside).
Johnson has lost 7/8 times in the US..
Clinton is just as likely to beat him over there as he is here ;)
Nah. Clinton was lucky to get a hometown decision twice. I had the series 2-0-1 for Johnson. With the third one being the draw.
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
That is true. But you seem to be forgetting the Woods has always been crap. Tarver by UD.
True. But that means Glengoffe "i was robbed" Johnson is crap too. So Tarvers crap wins extend to Johnson.
I have to say though that I think Johnson is 3-0 against Clinton woods
Woods had a rough 9th round but other than that you can't tell me that the gloves, elbows and forearms Johnson spent a lot of the fight hitting were enough?...
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
So even you have it 2-1 for Johnson ;)
Woods lost all 3 imo, close but Julio Gonzalez and Rico Hoye are his natural upper limits
And why has Johnson had to come over to Wood's backyrd each time. Tell me honestly if they hadn't all occurred in the US that Woods wouldnt have lost all 3.
Because Johnson aint worth two bob and his team can't win a purse bid (FW's help aside).
Johnson has lost 7/8 times in the US..
Clinton is just as likely to beat him over there as he is here ;)
Nah. Clinton was lucky to get a hometown decision twice. I had the series 2-0-1 for Johnson. With the third one being the draw.
How could Woods get a "hometown" decision if he was the away fighter.. 3rd time?
That don't make sense boy.
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Because Johnson aint worth two bob and his team can't win a purse bid (FW's help aside).
Johnson has lost 7/8 times in the US.. Clinton is just as likely to beat him over there as he is here ;)
Nah. Clinton was lucky to get a hometown decision twice. I had the series 2-0-1 for Johnson. With the third one being the draw.
How could Woods get a "hometown" decision if he was the away fighter.. 3rd time?
That don't make sense boy.
Lets see. All 3 fights took place in the UK. Woods is from the UK. Johnson is not. That kind of makes Woods the hometown fighter. It's not that hard to figure out
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Nah. Clinton was lucky to get a hometown decision twice. I had the series 2-0-1 for Johnson. With the third one being the draw.
How could Woods get a "hometown" decision if he was the away fighter.. 3rd time?
That don't make sense boy.
Lets see. All 3 fights took place in the UK. Woods is from the UK. Johnson is not. That kind of makes Woods the hometown fighter. It's not that hard to figure out
I have it 2-1 for Johnson . I struggle to see how anyone could have it different
Johnson took fights 1 and 2 clearly and Clinton had his number in the 3rd .
Tarver is just as bad as a washed up Johnson but Woods must not let it be that close cuz we know what the Yank judges are like .
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
As it goes although the fight took place in England Woods was the "away" fighter in the 3rd bout.
It was a Frank Warren do. He helped Johnsons team win the purse bids.. Johnson-Calzaghe was being lined up.. for the 50th time.
Micky Vann scored the fight for Johnson.. the two foreigners gave it to Clinton.
yeah, I forgot how bad they fucked him about... Trying to give him a cold dressing room etc... and Vann is so far in Warren's pocket it isn't even funny.
loves Ricky Hatton to bits... until he splits from Frank Warren... then when Carlos Mausa Continuously cuffed/thumbed/rubbed/nutted the cut he gave Hatton (caused by a nut) he does fuck all about it...
It's a good thing the other two Judges scored the fight properly.
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
I don't see any reason why Woods shouldn't beat Tarver comfortably.
Woods, as long as he doesn't "go" overnight, is still in great form.
In the past 2 years Tarver was crap against Roy. Crap against Hopkins. Crap against Muriqi. Crap against Rocky.. and Santiago was a pure nothing fight.
Problem is Woods could get shafted by the judges though. Tarver vs Dawson is a possibilty.
That is true. But you seem to be forgetting the Woods has always been crap. Tarver by UD.
;D
Awesome
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
As it goes although the fight took place in England Woods was the "away" fighter in the 3rd bout.
It was a Frank Warren do. He helped Johnsons team win the purse bids.. Johnson-Calzaghe was being lined up.. for the 50th time.
Micky Vann scored the fight for Johnson.. the two foreigners gave it to Clinton.
trudat
Re: Woods v Tarver press conference
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Nah. Clinton was lucky to get a hometown decision twice. I had the series 2-0-1 for Johnson. With the third one being the draw.
How could Woods get a "hometown" decision if he was the away fighter.. 3rd time?
That don't make sense boy.
Lets see. All 3 fights took place in the UK. Woods is from the UK. Johnson is not. That kind of makes Woods the hometown fighter. It's not that hard to figure out
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
As it goes although the fight took place in England Woods was the "away" fighter in the 3rd bout.
It was a Frank Warren do. He helped Johnsons team win the purse bids.. Johnson-Calzaghe was being lined up.. for the 50th time.
Micky Vann scored the fight for Johnson.. the two foreigners gave it to Clinton.
Hope this helps.