Did Joe just take away the p4p throne from Manny?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the wiz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft

Hopkins is a down-the-hill fighter bro.

Putting Calzaghe in the top spot right now is a little premature, don't you think? I mean, Kelly Pavlik would knock his snot out.

---

So Joe just beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins, but Hopkins schools Pavlik, and Pavlik KOs Joe? There's something wrong about this logic.

---

You can say Calzaghe won, but I wouldn't say he was beating "the bejeesus" out of him.

And who said Hopkins schools Pavlik?

---

So Joe beats everyone in front of him, including Nard in a fight where the ref was against Joe, and the immediate conclusion is Pavlik KOs Joe? Great analysis there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deanrw

This thread makes me smile :cool:

---

Not as much as Calzaghe fans all over the world. THANKS JOE! :cool:

Ok JLAQ, we get it, you're a big Calzaghe fan :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the wiz

Ok JLAQ, we get it, you're a big Calzaghe fan :rolleyes:

---

Not really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the wiz

Ok JLAQ, we get it, you're a big Calzaghe fan :rolleyes:

---

Not really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.

---

Uncontested punches? Are you sure you weren't watching an old Calzaghe fight tonight?

And I'm not a big Cortez fan but tonight I didn't think he played a role.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the wiz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the wiz

Ok JLAQ, we get it, you're a big Calzaghe fan :rolleyes:

---

Not really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.

---

Uncontested punches? Are you sure you weren't watching an old Calzaghe fight tonight?

And I'm not a big Cortez fan but tonight I didn't think he played a role.

---

A ref is supposed to limit illegal blows, which, in everyone's opinion, was raining like crazy. If you permit a fighter to get away with all these sheet, it DOES get to be a factor in the outcome of a fight. FYI, headbutts affect a fighter. Lowblows affect a fighter. Those rabbit punches affect a fighter.

Who is this fukin 20 post jerkoff anyway?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft

Whoa whoa whoa!!!

Hold your horses there cowboy. You're sounding like Max Kellerman.

First of all, PBF is the no.1

And second, Pac is in no.2 spot.

And third, a prime Hopkins would've easily whoop Calzaghe's ass.

PBF and Pac fought more quality fighters than Joe did.

---

P4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.

Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.

---

Your an idiot you said Hopkins is an average fighter without all his illegal blows so how would Mayweather lose to an average fighter ?? and if you think Mayweather would lose to a 43 year old man P4P then your a moron pure and simple.

You know what? I have no problem with calling Joe C #2 right now, ahead of Pac and behind Mayweather. He beat one of the greatest fighters of our generation last night.

LOL@ Calzaghe being above Floyd and LOL @ Calzaghe's victory being better than Floyd's over Hatton.

So just barely taking a RAZOR THIN split decision in which you were dropped in the first round is better than dominating and knocking your opponent senseless? Yeaaaaaaah, I think Calzaghe's cock must be cutting off the oxygen to your brain, pal. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

If not for the flash KD and Cortez' incompetent refereeing it would've been a SCHOOLING, and you know it.

---

Incompetent refereeing ?? Hopkins did get away with a lot of clinching, but Calzaghe was also lucky he didn't get a point taken away for all them rabbit shots and low blows.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft

Whoa whoa whoa!!!

Hold your horses there cowboy. You're sounding like Max Kellerman.

First of all, PBF is the no.1

And second, Pac is in no.2 spot.

And third, a prime Hopkins would've easily whoop Calzaghe's ass.

PBF and Pac fought more quality fighters than Joe did.

---

P4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.

Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.

---

You don't really believe this do you?

I'm a big fan of JC, but last night's performance actually takes him down a few notches.

Bomp, NO-ONE can look good against Hopkins ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JLAQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deanrw

This thread makes me smile :cool:

---

Not as much as Calzaghe fans all over the world. THANKS JOE! :cool:

---

Jlaq youre not a idiot but a idiat - Stop munching on joe's cock, which fight did you watch last night. Joe JUST JUST managed to beat a 43 yes 43 yr old man, whilst mayweather beat (sorry, whooped) hatton in his prime.

Whats the point of commenting on somethin when you cleary have no knowledge whatsoever and are an ignarant fool,