Quote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
Oh, she is. It's a bottlenose.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
Oh, she is. It's a bottlenose.
lol! ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGorillaQuote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
Oh, she is. It's a bottlenose.
Surely if you were a female turned on by aquatic mammals then a sperm whale would have to be the only choice?Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGorillaQuote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
Oh, she is. It's a bottlenose.
I remember several years back here, a tv news reported about a villager who took the bible passage, 'when it (part of body) cause you to sin, cut it off,' literally and chopped of his ......... sheesh, I can't spit it out - it's just so horrible... yup, that one. Can you believe that! the guy really did that, chopped of his man's best toy!:-X:o:rolleyes:
who`s to honestly say this is any more immoral than 2 guys going at it???
You laying the groundwork for a case on beasteality?Quote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
I can honestly say one is more immoral. One is consent. (2 guys) The other is basically rape. (animal)
I will in fact take it a step further to illustrate my point. Paedophilia is against the law because it is an exploitation of an adult against a child. A child does not have the proper reasoning skills or ability to make a judgement as to what may be right or wrong. The adult exploits that for personal fucked up reasons. It isn't much different given the difference in intellect between human and animal.
Get it?
I disagree. I mean animals arn't going to get emotionally damaged by it and they enjoy it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungbloodYou laying the groundwork for a case on beasteality?Quote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
I can honestly say one is more immoral. One is consent. (2 guys) The other is basically rape. (animal)
I will in fact take it a step further to illustrate my point. Paedophilia is against the law because it is an exploitation of an adult against a child. A child does not have the proper reasoning skills or ability to make a judgement as to what may be right or wrong. The adult exploits that for personal fucked up reasons. It isn't much different given the difference in intellect between human and animal.
Get it?
Seriously what is the world coming to when a man (or woman) can't show some physical love to their pet?
I think it's rightly illegal to have sex with animals in the wild, and other people's pets but if you own that animal then you have every right to show it some special tenderness.
I can't accept how you would criminalise esteemed Saddo members like Legion for merely wanting to share a special bond with his reptile inverterbrates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilboI disagree. I mean animals arn't going to get emotionally damaged by it and they enjoy it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungbloodYou laying the groundwork for a case on beasteality?Quote:
Originally Posted by hattonthehammer
I can honestly say one is more immoral. One is consent. (2 guys) The other is basically rape. (animal)
I will in fact take it a step further to illustrate my point. Paedophilia is against the law because it is an exploitation of an adult against a child. A child does not have the proper reasoning skills or ability to make a judgement as to what may be right or wrong. The adult exploits that for personal fucked up reasons. It isn't much different given the difference in intellect between human and animal.
Get it?
Seriously what is the world coming to when a man (or woman) can't show some physical love to their pet?
I think it's rightly illegal to have sex with animals in the wild, and other people's pets but if you own that animal then you have every right to show it some special tenderness.
I can't accept how you would criminalise esteemed Saddo members like Legion for merely wanting to share a special bond with his reptile inverterbrates.
Thing is, I get the vibe somehow hatton was serious here.
Whereas you, I just hope a giant St. Bernard bends you over and has it's way with you. Or, maybe roidraged ram..:sheep:
I should be so lucky :thinking2:Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungbloodQuote:
Originally Posted by BilboI disagree. I mean animals arn't going to get emotionally damaged by it and they enjoy it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Youngblood
Seriously what is the world coming to when a man (or woman) can't show some physical love to their pet?
I think it's rightly illegal to have sex with animals in the wild, and other people's pets but if you own that animal then you have every right to show it some special tenderness.
I can't accept how you would criminalise esteemed Saddo members like Legion for merely wanting to share a special bond with his reptile inverterbrates.
Thing is, I get the vibe somehow hatton was serious here.
Whereas you, I just hope a giant St. Bernard bends you over and has it's way with you. Or, maybe roidraged ram..:sheep: