Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
10 pounds aint that much of a difference anyway since kelly is a big guy. a kessler fight would be better than a calzaghe fight to me kessler has a better chance to win than joe
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
10 pounds aint that much of a difference anyway since kelly is a big guy. a kessler fight would be better than a calzaghe fight to me kessler has a better chance to win than joe
I have a tough time picking who would win between Kessler and Pavlik.
Kessler is clearly the more technical superior boxer who has fast hands, good power and is a good counter puncher.
In his fight against Calzaghe he performed well early on but once Calzaghe adapted kessler has no plan b and was also overwhelmed by Calzaghes high workrate + pressure was even hurt in the 8th by Calzaghe who lacks power at this stage of his career. pavlik hits harder than Calzaghe.
Pavlik is a good pressure fighter who has a good jab and a monster right hand, has a good workrate.
Pavlik has slow footwork and slow hands and is predictable. He also lacks defense and was hurt by Jermain Taylor who does have good power but kessler hits harder.
In the fight Pavlik would be the agressor coming forward and throwing his typical 1-2 combo with Kessler moving left and right trying to counter pavliks punches. Either Pavliks good workrate, power and pressure overwhelm Kessler and Pavlik gets the decision or possibly stops kessler late or Kessler's accurate hard counters and lateral movement help get him the decision and maybe even get him a stoppage win.
I hope this fight happens next year.;D
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
10 pounds aint that much of a difference anyway since kelly is a big guy. a kessler fight would be better than a calzaghe fight to me kessler has a better chance to win than joe
Both beat Pavlik handily.
Calzaghe always and i mean ALWAYS looks sensational against guys that come at him. Pavlik will press the fight and get really bust up.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
yea but kelly has been improvin on and on look at the lockett fight he didnt get hit that much he backed up when he came in and dropt him about 3 times and plus after the hopkins he will build up alot of experience after that. and kessler hasnt had much experience at all except joe and all his fights been in denmark against nobodys i checked his record so if he fights kelly hel just get kod cuz of the lack of experience he cant knock kelly out either kelly has fought power punchers before and knockin him down only make it worse.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
yea but kelly has been improvin on and on look at the lockett fight he didnt get hit that much he backed up when he came in and dropt him about 3 times and plus after the hopkins he will build up alot of experience after that. and kessler hasnt had much experience at all except joe and all his fights been in denmark against nobodys i checked his record so if he fights kelly hel just get kod cuz of the lack of experience he cant knock kelly out either kelly has fought power punchers before and knockin him down only make it worse.
Lockett got caught in the headlights and basically froze, he didnt let his hands go and shouldnt of been in there in the first place. The guy is a british level fighter, not even the best middleweight in Britain.
To say Kessler has no exprience?? WTF? He fought for the WBA 168 title in a hostile atmosphere in Australia, he has had i think 10+ 12 round fights in front of huge crowds. how can you say he aint experienced?
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
being in a hostile crowd is one thing having great fighters on your resume is another
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
I don;t think moving up to 175 will lessen his power any or his punches effect. What he has to worry about is at 175, much of the physical advantages he enjoys at 160 are gone as the opponents are just bigger. You also have to wonder about how durable he will be at 175 when it comes to taking his opponents punches.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Kelly hasn't fought at 175 before. So we don't know whether he can be a force or not. It's all ifs and buts. We will only found out once he fights at that weight.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
well if he kos hopkins which is a possibility he should stay there cause he will have a bigger name at 175 which will draw him into bigger fights like a dawson fight or even calzaghe if he isnt afraid. and believe me kelly wants to ko hopkins so he can put pressure on joe to fight him cause alot of people still say hopkins won the fight.
I don't see why people think Hopkins getting Ko'd is a possibility.
Pavlik may have good power at 160 but as his second fight with Taylor showed it doesn't carry plus the fact he is a slow accumulation puncher and Hopkins is hard as fuck to hit Cleanly. Pavlik will not land enough to put Hopkins in any trouble.
Pavlik fighting Hopkins is the biggest mistake he has ever made.
Him fighting Calzaghe would be another mistake.
Calzaghe just has the perfect style to beat him and i'm surprised people actually give him a chance against joe.
Calzaghe is open to the right hand, he has proved that in the past. Kelly has a lethal right hand, he has proved that in the past.
Hopkins knocked Calzaghe down with a right. Kelly Pavlik hits 10 x more harder than Hopkins. So if Hopkins can put Joe on his ass it's a scary thought what Pavlik could do.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
well if he kos hopkins which is a possibility he should stay there cause he will have a bigger name at 175 which will draw him into bigger fights like a dawson fight or even calzaghe if he isnt afraid. and believe me kelly wants to ko hopkins so he can put pressure on joe to fight him cause alot of people still say hopkins won the fight.
I don't see why people think Hopkins getting Ko'd is a possibility.
Pavlik may have good power at 160 but as his second fight with Taylor showed it doesn't carry plus the fact he is a slow accumulation puncher and Hopkins is hard as fuck to hit Cleanly. Pavlik will not land enough to put Hopkins in any trouble.
Pavlik fighting Hopkins is the biggest mistake he has ever made.
Him fighting Calzaghe would be another mistake.
Calzaghe just has the perfect style to beat him and i'm surprised people actually give him a chance against joe.
Calzaghe is open to the right hand, he has proved that in the past. Kelly has a lethal right hand, he has proved that in the past.
Hopkins knocked Calzaghe down with a right. Kelly Pavlik hits 10 x more harder than Hopkins. So if Hopkins can put Joe on his ass it's a scary thought what Pavlik could do.
don't forget Kessler has a lethal right to, he hits alot harder than Hopkins...
back on topic yeah I think Pavlik can do damage at 175, I'd like to see him at supermiddle first though, I think theres better fights there, hopefully he fights Abraham at supermiddle after Hopkins, don't think dropping from Lheavy to Middle will do his body any favors
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
being in a hostile crowd is one thing having great fighters on your resume is another
Kessler has more experience than Pavlik imo.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
being in a hostile crowd is one thing having great fighters on your resume is another
And the best fighter on Pavliks resume is Jermain Taylor. The same Taylor who was given the two fights with Hopkins and scored a draw with Wright where lots of people thought he lost and had two horrible performances against natural junior middleweights and you could argue he lost to cory spinks. Not exactly a great fighter is he.
Pavliks resume is overated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
well if he kos hopkins which is a possibility he should stay there cause he will have a bigger name at 175 which will draw him into bigger fights like a dawson fight or even calzaghe if he isnt afraid. and believe me kelly wants to ko hopkins so he can put pressure on joe to fight him cause alot of people still say hopkins won the fight.
I don't see why people think Hopkins getting Ko'd is a possibility.
Pavlik may have good power at 160 but as his second fight with Taylor showed it doesn't carry plus the fact he is a slow accumulation puncher and Hopkins is hard as fuck to hit Cleanly. Pavlik will not land enough to put Hopkins in any trouble.
Pavlik fighting Hopkins is the biggest mistake he has ever made.
Him fighting Calzaghe would be another mistake.
Calzaghe just has the perfect style to beat him and i'm surprised people actually give him a chance against joe.
Calzaghe is open to the right hand, he has proved that in the past. Kelly has a lethal right hand, he has proved that in the past.
Hopkins knocked Calzaghe down with a right. Kelly Pavlik hits 10 x more harder than Hopkins. So if Hopkins can put Joe on his ass it's a scary thought what Pavlik could do.
The Hopkins knockdown was more to Calzaghe being off balance and not seeing the punch. Hopkins has one of the sneakiest most accurate right hand in the sport.
What Calzaghe did to Kessler would be what he would do to Pavlik. Pavlik would have success with his right hand early but then Calzaghe adapts to it and takes over the fight.
By the way Pavlik does not hit 10x harder than bhop
Thats stupid talk . ;D
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
I believe he'll carry some pop up... People seem to forget that these are both guys that fought the majority of their careers at MW... It's not like you have a MW coming up to fight a natural LHW... Pavlik is a big MW and will translate well to 175.
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PRIDE OF BOSTON
I believe he'll carry some pop up... People seem to forget that these are both guys that fought the majority of their careers at MW... It's not like you have a MW coming up to fight a natural LHW... Pavlik is a big MW and will translate well to 175.
Thats the excuse they will make when Pavlik loses. ;D
Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PRIDE OF BOSTON
I believe he'll carry some pop up... People seem to forget that these are both guys that fought the majority of their careers at MW... It's not like you have a MW coming up to fight a natural LHW... Pavlik is a big MW and will translate well to 175.
Thats the excuse they will make when Pavlik loses. ;D
There's no way he can lose this fight... His output is to high. It won't be pretty but Pav will press the action and just plain outwork Nard...
It's just the way it is.. For the final 4.5 rounds of the Joe C fight Nard threw virtually nothing... He was used up. Joe does not hit anywhere close to as hard as even a MW in Pavlik. Pav starts touching that body early and he'll run out of steam even sooner.
I love Bernard but the people that think Nard is a favorite for this are just plain kidding themselves.