Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
I can give you some vids of Pavlik almost taking a guys head off with one clean flush shot. If he lands flush and hards he has better one punch knockout power than any one at 160.
The fight will be at 170 which i see having an effect on Pavliks punching power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
His jab is better than winky's because he pretty much almost knocked Zertuche out with it.
His jab is better than Wright's because he almost knocked out Zertuche with it...... And last i heard Zertuche was a top middleweight. :rolleyes:
Pavliks jab is more powerful but Wrights jab is more accurate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
before he put him to sleep WITH ONE PUNCH that was the strait right hand. The upper cut was just for show.
He put him to sleep after 7 rounds of battering him with 1-2 combos.
Not what i would call a one punch KO puncher. ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
To me Joe's speed is overrated. Taylor looks faster and has more power. Joe looked slow.
Even if you think his speed is overated he is clearly faster with his hands and his footwork than Pavlik.
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
caleoh12
I heard that Roach was against Hopkins fighting Pavlik. Is he still training Bernard or is someone else?
Nope Freddie won't be training him for this one.
Hopkins will be trained by Nazim Richardson.
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
ive been deleted those comments and dont get mad cause i caught you in the act you know it you can say that crap all over these posts but you know wat you said and i do not need to go any further on this sorry but you lose in this thread:nono:
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
ive been deleted those comments and dont get mad cause i caught you in the act you know it you can say that crap all over these posts but you know wat you said and i do not need to go any further on this sorry but you lose in this thread:nono:
I lost what exactly ?
I know exactly what i said because my opinion is still the same today. There is no need to lie about. You proved that you was a liar by deleting your profile comments.
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
i deleted them the same day u sent them you know the same day you said you prefer quanity over quality.;D well it doesnt matter now its old news but you know what you said and i kno what i said. and why would i make up something like that anyway that would be just stupid of me but anywayz we both know the truth so i end this now dont expect me to post back cause its over u posting back just makes me look like im telling the truth more than it does you. PEACE:-X:appl:
:thankyouthankyou:
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
i deleted them the same day u sent them you know the same day you said you prefer quanity over quality.;D well it doesnt matter now its old news but you know what you said and i kno what i said. and why would i make up something like that anyway that would be just stupid of me but anywayz we both know the truth so i end this now dont expect me to post back cause its over u posting back just makes me look like im telling the truth more than it does you. PEACE:-X:appl:
Look bro i know i what said and what i said was "i prefer quality over quantity though". you got it the wrong way round and you are saying i said that to suit your arguement. I have told various members i thought Hopkins won it 114-113. Why would i say i thought joe won the fight with a scorecard of 115-113 when that scorecard couldn't exist because of the KD. I know now that you are a complete liar and used complete lies to create a arguement. Pathetic bro pathetic.
Just admit you lied.
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
I can give you some vids of Pavlik almost taking a guys head off with one clean flush shot. If he lands flush and hards he has better one punch knockout power than any one at 160.
The fight will be at 170 which i see having an effect on Pavliks punching power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
His jab is better than winky's because he pretty much almost knocked Zertuche out with it.
His jab is better than Wright's because he almost knocked out Zertuche with it...... And last i heard Zertuche was a top middleweight. :rolleyes:
Pavliks jab is more powerful but Wrights jab is more accurate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
before he put him to sleep WITH ONE PUNCH that was the strait right hand. The upper cut was just for show.
He put him to sleep after 7 rounds of battering him with 1-2 combos.
Not what i would call a one punch KO puncher. ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
To me Joe's speed is overrated. Taylor looks faster and has more power. Joe looked slow.
Even if you think his speed is overated he is clearly faster with his hands and his footwork than Pavlik.
Pavlik out jabbed Taylor who out jabbed Wright. Pavlik at 170 will be allot stronger than 160 since he walks around close to 180 pounds. He does have the best power in middleweight and he would probably be the most powerful at 168 if he moved up. Here is a video.
1:11 , 1:33 , and 1:45 are good examples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQu0s...eature=related
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pugilistic
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
I can give you some vids of Pavlik almost taking a guys head off with one clean flush shot. If he lands flush and hards he has better one punch knockout power than any one at 160.
The fight will be at 170 which i see having an effect on Pavliks punching power.
His jab is better than Wright's because he almost knocked out Zertuche with it...... And last i heard Zertuche was a top middleweight. :rolleyes:
Pavliks jab is more powerful but Wrights jab is more accurate.
He put him to sleep after 7 rounds of battering him with 1-2 combos.
Not what i would call a one punch KO puncher. ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
To me Joe's speed is overrated. Taylor looks faster and has more power. Joe looked slow.
Even if you think his speed is overated he is clearly faster with his hands and his footwork than Pavlik.
Pavlik out jabbed Taylor who out jabbed Wright. Pavlik at 170 will be allot stronger than 160 since he walks around close to 180 pounds. He does have the best power in middleweight and he would probably be the most powerful at 168 if he moved up. Here is a video.
1:11 , 1:33 , and 1:45 are good examples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQu0s...eature=related
Nice Video. ;)
I felt in the second fight with Taylor the jabbing between the two was even, Taylor would have rounds that he would be controlling with his jab and the same with Pavlik. I can't really remember Taylor outjabbing Wright, i will have to watch that fight again. The problem Pavlik will have is that Hopkins won't get in range to let Pavlik use his jab, he did to both Taylor and Wright who both have faster jabs, there best weapons were never to be seen in their fights with Hopkins.
The reason i feel Pavliks power will not carry to 170 is due to his second fight with Taylor where the fight was at 166 and Pavlik couldn't finish him. I will admit Taylor fought a smarter more defensive fight but in reality Hopkins always fights a smart defensive fight, hopkins is alot harder to hit than Taylor and even though Taylor is way younger Hopkins is faster on his feet.
Re: Hopkins interview on fighting Pavlik.
He makes a huge point & I would like to see a second fight with Calzaghe, but something tells me that Hopkins will beat Pavlik & Roy's speed will be too much for Joe, cuz IMO Roy is going to dance all nite into a SD! This means a big fight between the two! But unless Roy doesn't get caught on the chin by Joe & IMO Joe has the power in accumulation of punches but Roy is just the quicker puncher!
