Re: The Ring magazine covers
Vasquez-Marquez should have been a picture of them trading punches on at least one cover. B-Hop Obviously deserves to be recognised.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
I am sure the covers are changed for the British audience, they will have Hatton, Joe or Haye now.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C-Lo
January 2009 has David Haye in the cover.
And that's right! You guessed it! Manny Pacquiao is on the cover again for the February 2009 issue
And most probably in May. :cool:
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Other then Bhop not getting an ounce of respect?
Hopkins was recently on the cover
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Other then Bhop not getting an ounce of respect?
I think that including B-hop there are a lot of quality boxers being overlooked. Why have the same boxer two months in a row?
Does anyone here have a subscription to the magazine? Is it worth it?
Yeah. I think it is. I've had a subscription for like 10 years. And will continue to have on
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Mayweather is going to be the cover of the March issue
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Other then Bhop not getting an ounce of respect?
Hopkins was recently on the cover
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Other then Bhop not getting an ounce of respect?
I think that including B-hop there are a lot of quality boxers being overlooked. Why have the same boxer two months in a row?
Does anyone here have a subscription to the magazine? Is it worth it?
Yeah. I think it is. I've had a subscription for like 10 years. And will continue to have on
I've had one for three years and will continue to have one. Do you have any other subscriptions? How about that UK mag? Kidding.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
I still have my boxing mags from 1984 - 1998, not complete sets, some before and after the dates. They were certainly much better in content quality than today magazines.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
PAC again on another Ring Mag cover...;D
http://xs539.xs.to/xs539/09215/8497.jpg
;D
Re: The Ring magazine covers
For me, featuring the same guy, this really doesn't do a tonne for the sport, there are so many top top boxers, atleast get some kind of spread and introduce different weight classes too. Atleast feature that months current most interestin / exciting champion from a diff weight class. Showin the same boxers all the time makes the sport look a million times shallower than it actually is. I I think boxing is alot deeper in talent these days than when it relied on heavyweights. Theres some great fighters at very different weights for Ring to be considerin introducin. Always thinkin about the short term, whos now.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Ring Mag are Pac nuthuggers... damn.. there are about a thousand plus fighters out there for cover why pac almost every other month..
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
antimoron
Ring Mag are Pac nuthuggers... damn.. there are about a thousand plus fighters out there for cover why pac almost every other month..
To think that PAC is not even a Golden Boy Promotions boxer, this is highly anomalous... ;)
Ring Mag is owned by Golden Boy and PAC is a Top Rank boxer...
.
Re: The Ring magazine covers
Yes, Pac has too many covers.
I would like to read Ring Magazine but unfortunately I live in a country where newsagents don't actually exist. All my boxing reading is done online.