According to the judges' result who scored the fight and was sitting on three different ring angles the whole times (not from 1-D tv screen)...
YES, Pacquiao has beaten Marquez.
Printable View
According to the judges' result who scored the fight and was sitting on three different ring angles the whole times (not from 1-D tv screen)...
YES, Pacquiao has beaten Marquez.
Look it up on boxrec....that will tell you the only answer that matters.
Thank you Captain Obvious.
This thread isn't about who the judges thought won the fight, that's already been determined (although apparently from one of those three ringside angles it looked like Marquez won), it's about how each of us scored it. What was your score?
According to the judges Pernell Whitaker vs Julio Cesar Chavez was a draw right ? wrong it wasn't a draw it was a robbery. Now im not saying JMM vs Manny Pacquiao 2 is a robbery it was a close fight.
But please stop using the judges as your argument, i haven't seen one good response why you thought Manny Pacquiao won. To me you sound like a nuthugger, i know some good Manny Pacquiao fans on this site.
That i could debate with on this subject and they would give me there reason's, why they thought Manny Pacquiao won and i could respect that. Give me your reason's and stop keep using the judges because thats pretty weak, you've done that in two threads so far.
Hell it would be a pretty boring world for boxing if we all just used the judges scorecards all the time, and accepted them and never debated about a decision.
I thought JMM won because despite JMM being floored. He comeback very strong in the later rounds taking the fight to Manny Pacquaio. I thought the fight was up for grabs until JMM made a stand and pulled it out in the later rounds.
Now thats my opinion im not saying its right or wrong, but now i would like you to debate back and give me your reason's why you thought Manny Pacquiao won.
It was a very close fight.
I had Marquez winning it 114-113.