Re: campbell v bradley who you got
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by
paddy448
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
This is an interesting fight, Campbell showed he could be outworked in his last bout against Funeka. Bradley showed he could be knocked down in his last fight against Holt.
I think Campbell can hit harder that Holt and that is definately a factor, but I always like to go with the workrate and think Bradley will rise off the canvas and keep Campbell in his shell for most of the night.
yeah i remember bradley going down, i think it was from a holt left hook. i cannot believe he got up from it to be honest. good chin. anyways i see what you mean about the workrate, campbell is a cute fighter tho will definately pick up rounds. i cant decide
Bradley was also dropped by an uppercut on the inside round 11 or 12.
Campbell has already faced Bradley's style in Diaz so its not like Nate wont have an effective gameplan. Wiley vets like Nate dont have to rely on volume but effective counterpunching.
People were picking Diaz over JMM saying that Marquez couldnt hang with the volume at his age. You all saw what happen
Not sold on Bradley and though Nate is a hard luck kind of guy he is still easily a shade above Timothy
I'm a big Nate Campbell fan, but he is no JMM. Then again, Bradley is no Diaz from what I've seen.
This is a very compelling fight.
Re: campbell v bradley who you got
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by
paddy448
yeah i remember bradley going down, i think it was from a holt left hook. i cannot believe he got up from it to be honest. good chin. anyways i see what you mean about the workrate, campbell is a cute fighter tho will definately pick up rounds. i cant decide
Bradley was also dropped by an uppercut on the inside round 11 or 12.
Campbell has already faced Bradley's style in Diaz so its not like Nate wont have an effective gameplan. Wiley vets like Nate dont have to rely on volume but effective counterpunching.
People were picking Diaz over JMM saying that Marquez couldnt hang with the volume at his age. You all saw what happen
Not sold on Bradley and though Nate is a hard luck kind of guy he is still easily a shade above Timothy
I'm a big Nate Campbell fan, but he is no JMM. Then again, Bradley is no Diaz from what I've seen.
This is a very compelling fight.
I was going to preface that but I thought it was a given:p;D
You are right about Bradley he has decent wins against Junior Shitter and Kendall Holt where as even though Diaz was beat 2x I still have him a cut above Bradley at this juncture
Re: campbell v bradley who you got
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
Bradley was also dropped by an uppercut on the inside round 11 or 12.
Campbell has already faced Bradley's style in Diaz so its not like Nate wont have an effective gameplan. Wiley vets like Nate dont have to rely on volume but effective counterpunching.
People were picking Diaz over JMM saying that Marquez couldnt hang with the volume at his age. You all saw what happen
Not sold on Bradley and though Nate is a hard luck kind of guy he is still easily a shade above Timothy
I'm a big Nate Campbell fan, but he is no JMM. Then again, Bradley is no Diaz from what I've seen.
This is a very compelling fight.
I was going to preface that but I thought it was a given:p;D
You are right about Bradley he has decent wins against Junior Shitter and Kendall Holt where as even though Diaz was beat 2x I still have him a cut above Bradley at this juncture
ive liked bradley for a while i think he has a lot of skill, hes quick,got ok power, busy ,quick on his feet,he has alot to work with. i see him and ortiz(verysoon) as the main two at 140 . minus pacman cause hes just going after big fights now.
Re: campbell v bradley who you got
People saying that Nate Campbell will be outworked, there was nothing wrong with his output against Juan Diaz. The only problem is that he is a very hot/cold fighter.
Against Ali Funeka i don't think it was the workrate so much, it was more to do with size of Ali Funeka that gave Nate Campbell, a hard time getting on the inside.
Timothy Bradley is good but he's not that good IMO, he is very beatable and if Nate Campbell shows up at his best, i think he will beat Timothy Bradley comfortably points wise.
