Printable View
Don't be so quick to bash Khan like you always do.. I'm pretty sure he was saying Prescott could bang with the best. Which I disagree with anyway.. he's looked very average in the fights i've seen him in when his opponent isn't charging in, aka like Khan did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
To answer the question:
Khan vs Gomez
Khan vs St Claire
Khan vs Kotelnik
I was talking about Prescott.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseBased on what? The only time he faced a puncher he got knocked the fukk outQuote:
Originally Posted by PugilisticPrescott isn't a world class fighter but there is no doubt that he can bang with the best of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by rjj tszyu
I'd pick Khan to beat him now though.
Although Prescott's opposition isn't the best, there is no denying he can punch. The problem for him is thats all he's got.
I'm the same way with Cotto. I'm always surprise at how many of his fights i've seen considering a i'm not really a cotto fan. Though i am starting to become one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugilistic
Can someone please explain to me why theres so much negativity bout Amir Khan? Theres no question the lad is talented. Iv seen posts on here calling him boring!!! The one thing khan isnt is boring. Peoples saying now that Barrera was finished. While i agree he was no where near the fighter that he was, at the time of the fight there wasnt too many saying it. In fact,most people were saying that he was gonna KO Khan. Khan wins,(and wins well,i gave him every round) and people move the goalposts and say Barreras finished. Why werent they saying it before the fight? Now im not saying Khans the reincarnation of SRR, but he deserves some credit for taking him on 2 fights after Prescott,who if you see his record, is a good banger and anyone can be caught cold. Its happened to the best of them. You would think he was a complete w****r the way people go on about him
Any one who thought Barrera was even a shell of the man he was some years ago, needs there head checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmaff36
Roach has turned Con around.
It would be nice to see Con get revenge but Prescott would have to move up to 140 and he should to try and chase Con again. Why not?
I like the new Con and his fight against the Jewish kid will be an interesting one.
Jewish vs Muslim
;D
Of course no one is thinking along those lines right?
Of course not.
;D
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmaff36
Go search on some of the more lengthy discussions we've had on here.
If Barrera was finished then Khan/Roach were glory hunting for a name to look good on Khans record -that's a good thing?
You state yourself with bringing up Prescott -if you see his record- is a good banger. Well it's actually better to watch the fights AND see the level of opposition AND see the way in which fights are fought, won and lost. Records don't tell the whole story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ***********Any one who thought Barrera was even a shell of the man he was some years ago, needs there head checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmaff36
Roach has turned Con around.
It would be nice to see Con get revenge but Prescott would have to move up to 140 and he should to try and chase Con again. Why not?
I like the new Con and his fight against the Jewish kid will be an interesting one.
Jewish vs Muslim
;D
Of course no one is thinking along those lines right?
Of course not.
;D
Have you changed your name because everyone thought you were a douche last time round?
No sweety pie. I had my old account deleted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Howlin Mad MissyQuote:
Originally Posted by ***********Any one who thought Barrera was even a shell of the man he was some years ago, needs there head checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmaff36
Roach has turned Con around.
It would be nice to see Con get revenge but Prescott would have to move up to 140 and he should to try and chase Con again. Why not?
I like the new Con and his fight against the Jewish kid will be an interesting one.
Jewish vs Muslim
;D
Of course no one is thinking along those lines right?
Of course not.
;D
Have you changed your name because everyone thought you were a douche last time round?
I don't think I have ever insulted you, but you like that (being disrespected right?). Not how I roll.
I still refuse to insult you because unlike the rest of the boys here, I myself don't pick on the women.
:cool:
Not sure what your getting at pal. If khan/roach were 'glory-hunting' for a name on his record then they're not doing anything any different from 99.9999% of fighters. As for Prescott, all i said was that hes a good banger and anyone can get caught cold. As for the last bit about watching fights,level of opposition etc etc, i cant see the relevance of directing that at me nor can i make sense of it with regarding my post. Im not an advocate of Khans, i just think some people are too hard on him. He cant do right for doing wrong but thats just my opinionQuote:
Originally Posted by Howlin Mad MissyQuote:
Originally Posted by johnmaff36
Go search on some of the more lengthy discussions we've had on here.
If Barrera was finished then Khan/Roach were glory hunting for a name to look good on Khans record -that's a good thing?
You state yourself with bringing up Prescott -if you see his record- is a good banger. Well it's actually better to watch the fights AND see the level of opposition AND see the way in which fights are fought, won and lost. Records don't tell the whole story.