Printable View
i have a feeling that if pacquiao wins a congressional seat in general santos city, his life is going to be in grave danger. just read that two of his ardent supporters were gunned down a few days ago. this is not a very good sign for pacquiao. i also know that pacquiao as a congressman will be easily manipulated by some around him. as much as pacquiao is considered the lord and savior in his home country, there are others who would make a big statement by assassinating him or his family.
Rematch if result is somewhat controversial. If PBF clearly wins, retirement or Hatton? Preferred choice is Mosley of course if he wins in January, but I don't see what Mosley has done to make PBF change his mind and fight him, other than calling him out after Floyd's Marquez win. Whatever your opinion of it, Floyd prioritizes his health and his "hit, not get hit" strategy over his legacy.
If Pacquiao wins, retirement or maybe one more fight with Marquez at 140? It would pay as much as Mosley and would be less risk, right? Plus, removes any doubt to his legacy regarding his Marquez win/draw.
You can forget a rematch with Marquez at 140, it would be too "tough" for him and too dangerous, he'd rather fight some middle name around his actual weight class or fight the dangerous big names once they are shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rantcatrat
If floyd wins he'll shoot right over to the I.R.S. If pac wins he'll head over to shane m's to pay him for the juice. Fruit juice...what'd you think i meant.
This will be fight 1 of 2 in 2010. It will be competitive and it will be close.
People keep saying SHane, but he has to win his fight first and it will be a very tough one if Berto is at his best. The winner of that seems the only plausible choice for Mayweather after facing Pacquiao, if he wins. If not I think Manny retires.
There probably won't be a winner of Pac-May since Pac is refusing blood tests for PEDs and there won't be a fight.
concerning blood tests for the mayweather/pacquiao fight, i don't know why roach is so adamantly opposed to these blood tests. i mean, if he doesn't have anything to hide and as long as mayweather submits blood samples then what's the problem? i read somewhere that mayweather sr. scoffed at roach's claim that a blood test six weeks before the fight might negatively impact pacquiao mentally. WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP! this is outrageous and just adds fuel to the fire that pacquiao is on roid/ped's.
He's not. He said he was all for according to an interview to ESPN: Testing fuss jeopardizes Manny Pacquiao-Floyd Mayweather fight - ESPNQuote:
Originally Posted by milmascaras1
"I have no problem with the testing whatsoever," Roach said then. "They can do whatever kind of drug testing they want. They're scared of Manny and scared of his power. He'll pass any test in the world."
Schaefer said he hoped it was simply a "miscommunication" on the Pacquiao side.