Re: The Ring Magazine acknowledges Bradley on it's cover.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
I think what's clear there is that Pacquiao has been on the cover waaaay too much. I mean obviously he's the best, but really does he need to be on the covers of half their more recent 14 issues?
And they haven't done a Super-Six cover??
Have they even done a Super Six Article?
Killersheep? Do you know of one?
Re: The Ring Magazine acknowledges Bradley on it's cover.
Bradley is more then worthy of being on the cover of ring...This kid is the real deal...He is not a fighter who got lucky by beating an aging champion then spends his time fighting the worst possible comp available...
Witter, Cherry, Holt, Peterson, Campbell...Not too shabby considering he fought them all back to back...
This kid keeps improving every time out as well so its not like Bradley is the type of fighter to sit back on his accomplishments and admire himself he WANTS to be considered one of the elite he does not take it upon himself to say he is elite...
Add his positive attitude both in and out of the ring and he is a poster boy of what boxing needs to thrive...
IMO we will see him on plenty more covers in the future
Re: The Ring Magazine acknowledges Bradley on it's cover.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
I think what's clear there is that Pacquiao has been on the cover waaaay too much. I mean obviously he's the best, but really does he need to be on the covers of half their more recent 14 issues?
And they haven't done a Super-Six cover??
Have they even done a Super Six Article?
Killersheep? Do you know of one?
I have an issue where they did the Super Six, let me go get it real quick.
ok...........The November '09 and January '10 both had articles in them.