Chisora's your boy. ;D
Printable View
Ha...well I wouldn't say that. I just feel kind of bad for the ugly fuck he seems to actually enjoy fighting, he's got a bit of a mean streak in him. I think Chisora would have given a better effort than Haye.
Fury is out there saying how he knows he would beat Wladimir :vd:
You Brits aren't much on humility are you ;D
It depends what you mean by better effort? run aout throwing punches? maybe but wlad would have KO'ed him within 3. Chisora is a similar size to haye but with out the speed, footwork or punch power or ability. I can't see chisora doing 12 rounds with wlad he doesn't have the stamina.
However I do think he'll beat fury who struggled with a very game mcdermott.
Wlad has absolutely nothing to worry about from either of these.
David Price would destroy either of these without too much problem.
Americans still support Americans, but as an American I tend to judge American fighters more harshly than other fighters. I said Arreola had no shot at winning a title off either Klitschko and so far I'm right. I was a bit shocked when Adamek beat Arreola so easily, but like I've said he's not a student of the sweet science he's a brutish brawler and therefore he's limited in what he can do.
Seth Mitchell, Joe Hanks, Deontay Wilder are all a bit green to fight at a high level, but they are relatively young and there's time for them to learn.
I've yet to see much of Price. Chisora and Fury seem like they'll be good on tv, but they aren't extremely talented IMO.
As for Haye, he's a great athlete but he put in a horrible effort and if he did that vs anyone else yes he would lose again.
I'm going with Chisora.
Don't really rate Fury at all... and if Wlad was going to give a title shot to Chisora then obviously Chisora must be a high calibre opponent and much better than Fury.
Kidding of course, but I still don't get what Chisora had done to earn the shot, I know Wlad likes to keep busy, but come on! ;)
I think Richard Towers beats them all, he's just so poorly managed no one knows about him, so he is never going to get any decent fights.
Shame because he is just going to float along picking up average pay days for ages and then when he does get a decent fight he'll lose because he has only fought bums.
Best raw British heavyweight talent I've seen in ages. A giant guy who is actually fit and healthy. No fat on him at all.
I'd like for Mitchell, Hanks, or Wilder to get a shot at the winner or loser of this match...it would be good stuff.
Probably Chisora. I think it'll be on points, I don't think his power is great and I think Fury should be durable enough to go the distance. I like Fury though so I'll be cheering him on.
I think fury, what he lacks in skill he makes up for in bravery
Although I think he does have skill he just needs a good trainer.
I think Steward is good at refining a finished product and getting the best out of it... but If Fury is a finished product then I'd be after a refund, manufacturing error.
Look what Steward did for Hamed. He didn't have enough to work with to make enough of a difference and I see it the same with Fury.
I disagree. He's great at taking a guy either from scratch or who is 'damaged goods' in some way & refining them. I think his work with guys like Hamed, Oscar & Dawson shows that when a guy just comes to him for the name value, there is little improvement.
Fury is neither & has clearly got motivation issues judging from the fact he flits between a dozen trainers between fights. It's tough fight for a rooting interest, I don't know who I want to win.
Chisora to stop Fury around the 8th. Fury has terrible stamina he has a decent heart but Chisora is a step up from what he has been fighting. Chisora will grind him down slowly imo.