Printable View
if it's because of quality of opposition and number of people faced i would put holyfield first. if it's because of quality of opposition no matter age, that is, names, i would put pacquiao first. if it's because i say it because i have to be honest with what i think then:
1 mayweather
2 vitali
3 pacman
4 marquez
5 ward
6 martinez
7 wlad
8 donaire
9 bradley
10 khan
Can't Argue with that list. Only thing I would change is take Khan out and put Vitali or Gamboa there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugilistic
I'm pretty sure they said P4P list not your favorite fighters ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Manuel "Chubby" Medina
1. Mayweather
2.Pacquiao
3.Martinez
4.Marquez
5.Donaire
6.Ward
7.Hopkins
8.Bute
9.Khan
10. W Klitschko
Because a p4p list is supposed to gauge who the best fighter would be if all fighters weighed the same. If Wlad or Vitali were Welters, how dominant do you think they'd be?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropanuke
Quote:
Originally Posted by onoBecause a p4p list is supposed to gauge who the best fighter would be if all fighters weighed the same. If Wlad or Vitali were Welters, how dominant do you think they'd be?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropanuke
Oooooooh ....... Vitali Vs Pacman. You know Manny loves a catchweight fight!
Seriously tho, whens the last time Mayweather, either Klit and until his last fight Manny even lost a round? Id say thats a strong reason for those 4 topping the list in whatever order you like, for me Mayweather tops it every time.
Anybody else agrees that these lists are a little more scarce on talent than they used to be just a couple of years back? Seems harder now to come up with p4p lists. IMO, the fact that an old goat like Hopkins is still floating around these lists is indicative that we desperately need some fresh (major) talent out there.... PRONTO.
I don't think these lists mean anything much, but if you're going by anything it has to be primarily who the best fighters around are, surely? To say oh Mayweather isn't on there because he doesn't fight often enough but then have Tim Bradley is pretty laughable really, as if that would even be a fight, not to mention Bradley hasn't fought anyone great or been terribly active himself.. I'm only really confident on my top 3, which is telling as to the lack of fresh blood in this sport these days as Titofan pointed out. These lists looked a lot better not to long ago.
1. Mayweather
2. Pacquiao
3. Marquez
4. Agbeko
5. Martinez
6. Gamboa
7. Chad Dawson
8. Wlad Klitschko
9. Bute
10. Froch? Ward? Cotto? Khan? Hopkins? (felt he wouldn't have had many answers for Dawson and is on his last legs)
Like I say though, after the top few it really isn't an impressive list as it should be. You could change the order any which way and it wouldn't mean squat to me.