Boxing or ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by killersheep

For me it's simply a matter of who is able to execute their plan better. A "boxer" needs to be effective much more often during the course of the round, whereas if a "slugger" lands a good few shots that noticably hurt the boxer they could steal it. It all comes down to who controls the fight. Coming foward by itself means nothing unless effective shots are accompanying it. Likewise a briliant defensive display by itself won't win a round for me, unless there are counters included. So applying this to the original question I don't prefer a boxer or a slugger as far winning rounds I prefer the one that executes their plan better.

---

Far comment , we all have different view's on what we like in a boxing match.?:cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YIDDLE

i remember watching minter/hamsho and thinking minter had won and i rewatched watched it a couple of times last year and still felt that minter had won but i did feel it was a little closer than i had thought when i had first seen it

---

I feel Minter just out boxed him, one thing you can't take away from Minter he was a fine boxer,
Hamsho on the other hand very tough and crude.?:)