Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
I'm the only person that believes Williams still has a chance to do some damage in the division if matched correctly, huh?
Yes ;D
I think Ishida will tell us alot and I'm note ruling out the upset. Williams vs Kirkland would be a train wreck!!
I agree on wating to see what happens with Ishida. I believe Pwill is going to knock him out badly and early. ;D
He just needs to stay away from certain styles. Don't hold me to this until after the Ishida fight, but I believe Pwill would eat Alvarez up.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Baby Chavez.... if he (Alvarez) can get up to 160. Problem is... he'd have a puncher's chance and might accidentally let fly with a haymaker and drop Baby and his bloated "0". Then Papa would have to put out a contract on him.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Baby Chavez.... if he (Alvarez) can get up to 160. Problem is... he'd have a puncher's chance and might accidentally let fly with a haymaker and drop Baby and his bloated "0". Then Papa would have to put out a contract on him.
i second that;) the only difference is i actually see junior having a slight edge on this one, didnt realize this kid was that big for the weight.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.
In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.
In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.
Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.
In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.
Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?
that's what i thought, but for some reason i'm pretty sure he must face kirkland/molina winner to become the mandatory.
right now the leading contenders are mosley, rodriguez, and bracero. Rodriquez is the best option of the three, and not a bad fight for Canelo at this stage.
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I think K9 or Angulo, maybe Ortiz could move up...
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to me
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.
In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.
Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?
that's what i thought, but for some reason i'm pretty sure he must face kirkland/molina winner to become the mandatory.
right now the leading contenders are mosley, rodriguez, and bracero. Rodriquez is the best option of the three, and not a bad fight for Canelo at this stage.
I agree about Rodriguez, but I still think an Angulo bout would be a war