Romney vs. Obama Debate - Part III - the final insult Monday night.

Obama wiping the floor with Romney on everything foreign policy. He basically is just saying he agrees with everything the Obama adminstration is doing with confidence. Outside of that he looks lost. He keeps trying to talk about the economy because that is all he is strong on.

We'll see what the pundits and polls say in the following days, but I think this is a fairly clear win for Obama on Foreign policy.

Also, Mitt looked and sounded like he ate a bad oyster all night. lol There was a rumor he was sick earlier today. Bad time for it, if so.

http://www.google.com/url?source=img...kiczv-czXSg-Vg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mars_ax

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

The backhand of the night, albeit in condescending asshole fashion goes to the guy with the much smaller Flag pendant....'well Governor we also have less bayonets but this isn't a game of Battleship we use to count ships and resources'.

I say just let em fight it out already. Old school tribe leader style :-X;D

ohhh mjor bounce back for Romney smacking him down about Israel :o Get Richard steele in here

---

Actually as far as "debating" is going, I think they're both doing a good job, I just happen to like Romney better personally, and trust him to get the country back on track.

---

Your right, both holding own but Obama seemed more on point, sharper and Mitt danced around a bit. Trust is at the front and a must of any man, yeh. But I think alot of people go for the feel good or what they dislike on the otherside. Thats as it should be as Obama has the record, or lack there of, that he has to run on. Romney has the oppurtunity to be new...turn the page or 'change' but at the end of the day I dont think I'll ever meet a man running for political office that I'll devote my trust in.

I tuned in for portions. Maybe 2/3 of the whole thing. Romney didn't really score any points with me but the President seemed much more concentrated on attacking Romney then articulating his plan or explaining his record. To me Ad hominem is sure sign of defeat.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mars_ax

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

The backhand of the night, albeit in condescending asshole fashion goes to the guy with the much smaller Flag pendant....'well Governor we also have less bayonets but this isn't a game of Battleship we use to count ships and resources'.

I say just let em fight it out already. Old school tribe leader style :-X;D

ohhh mjor bounce back for Romney smacking him down about Israel :o Get Richard steele in here

---

Actually as far as "debating" is going, I think they're both doing a good job, I just happen to like Romney better personally, and trust him to get the country back on track.

---

Your right, both holding own but Obama seemed more on point, sharper and Mitt danced around a bit. Trust is at the front and a must of any man, yeh. But I think alot of people go for the feel good or what they dislike on the otherside. Thats as it should be as Obama has the record, or lack there of, that he has to run on. Romney has the oppurtunity to be new...turn the page or 'change' but at the end of the day I dont think I'll ever meet a man running for political office that I'll devote my trust in.

---

Well, personally there's few people that i'd put total trust in, not just politicians. Let me put it another way, as for "foreign policy" i'd much rather have Romney at the helm in a crisis. And most importantly, I really believe that Romney is best man for fixing the economy, creating jobs and reducing the deficit, something I zero faith in BO doing. The thought of 4 more years of Obama is fucking depressing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

I tuned in for portions. Maybe 2/3 of the whole thing. Romney didn't really score any points with me but the President seemed much more concentrated on attacking Romney then articulating his plan or explaining his record. To me Ad hominem is sure sign of defeat.

---

That's been a major part of BO and the Dems' campaign & debate strategy, ad hominem attacks, and calling Romney and Ryan liars et al. To me BO acts like a condescending, presumptive, asshole, where's his plan for recovery been, and where is it for the next 4 years? Ans: BO doesn't have one. :-X

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youngblood

Obama wiping the floor with Romney on everything foreign policy. He basically is just saying he agrees with everything the Obama adminstration is doing with confidence. Outside of that he looks lost. He keeps trying to talk about the economy because that is all he is strong on.

We'll see what the pundits and polls say in the following days, but I think this is a fairly clear win for Obama on Foreign policy.

---

Eh, I think Romney held his own on Foreign policy, but that's not what I really give a fuck about, it's 6, half a dozen of the other.
My main concern is the economy, jobs, balancing the budget, and lowering the deficit, the businessman Romney stomps a mudhole in BO's ass when it comes to these vitally important issues.

I get it Mars, you really want Romney to win and that is cool and all. And I would agree that the economy is very important in this election, for your country, and in the eyes of voters. But also, the Presidency is a multi-faceted job. Foreign affairs a big part of that not just for the next 4 years, but for laying the groundwork for your countries entire future both at home and within the world community.

I have no idea what this debate will mean on the election. I just know Romney did not look strong at all tonight. He lost the debate. A win or even close tie would have served him better to show him strong on more than just the issue of economy. He didn't.

Romney's tax plan is such absurd pandering. I have to think, or hope, that's all it is. He can't be stupid enough to think it would actually work, he just has to hope people are dumb enough to buy it, and then hopefully if he gets elected he'll change tack and become a bit more realistic.

I have to thank Romney for 'Tumult'. I had no idea this was even a real word but he killed with it 3 times in the first 4 minutes :cwm15:

The Syria policy was all over the map. 'We should be playing leadership role' in Syria but totally rules out military involvement to bring on new "Government". We've seen this movie before...

I thought Obama did a great job last night........if his goal was to look like a condescending prick. Mitt Romney should have hammered him on Libya but I suppose his best line he had was about how attacking him is not an agenda for the next 4 years.

I suppose people will see my view as biased and I suppose it is after living 4 years under the current President I suppose I have become a little biased.

Obama won that one again too. Romney just doesn't have any credible ideas. It's hilarious watching him fumble with default mode being '4 years and look where we are'. I mean the guy is a bit stupid. Was Rome build in a day ya'll? Get with reality, Brother Grimm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

Obama won that one again too. Romney just doesn't have any credible ideas. It's hilarious watching him fumble with default mode being '4 years and look where we are'. I mean the guy is a bit stupid. Was Rome build in a day ya'll? Get with reality, Brother Grimm.

---

Rome wasn't built in a day but I suspect they were seeing progress 4 years into the project miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youngblood

I get it Mars, you really want Romney to win and that is cool and all. And I would agree that the economy is very important in this election, for your country, and in the eyes of voters. But also, the Presidency is a multi-faceted job. Foreign affairs a big part of that not just for the next 4 years, but for laying the groundwork for your countries entire future both at home and within the world community.

I have no idea what this debate will mean on the election. I just know Romney did not look strong at all tonight. He lost the debate. A win or even close tie would have served him better to show him strong on more than just the issue of economy. He didn't.

---

Yes, I want Romney to win, and equally as important, I want this pretentious piece of shit, BO out of the white house.
I see no reason not to believe that Romney won't do as good of a job or better then BO with regards to Foreign Affairs and the World Community.
The domestic economy, jobs, balancing the budget, and lowering the deficit is still the U.S. #1. priority, getting us strong at home, will help make us strong around the world. In a nutshell, Romney has a proven workable plan, BO does not.

P.S. who's the better "debater" means fuck all, I want real results, where it matters.