What Happened to the Planes and Passengers on 9/11?

Im sure the government had a clue something big was about to go down though Lyle, they already had a visiting team of some national emergency crew right there for some reason by memory.:-\

So its the same as the Holocaust then? All the films must have been made by the same people who falsified all the films of the Jews being lined up on trench edges and shot and any bone fragments found must be made by the same team that falsified all the skeletal remains they dug up too :rolleyes:.

Maybe there were some charges already in the buildings :-\ who knows it would be a good security idea considering the countries wealth is ran from right there (you go under attack from another country the buildings drop to stop the enemy getting all your business contacts and fucking you up later too).You know at a stretch, thats quite feasible.

To kill your own to create an excuse for war doesnt sound right when you add up whats to made out of that particular enemy, it just doesnt add up,I think they are smarter than that.But I do think they knew or had a real close idea about it.

http://www.singlespeedstella.com/fantasy-island.jpg

Why would anyone want to fake it?


What did they gain? Financial turmoil, mass body count, a reason to start a war?

If you stare hard enough at a cloud, sometimes you can see pictures, not because they are there, but because you want to see them.

never mind that... what about this :o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XesDygYTmWo



;D;D;D;D

Hitler didnt have holographic technology. Those planes were missiles disguised as holograms. They have electron-pulse weapons now that are so advanced we would shitThe underside of the 2nd plane clearly has 3 missiles attached to itThat is NOT a commercial flight and many eyewitnesses including airport employees who service these jets witnessed the incoming plane and said NO WAY was that a commercial flight---police and even some military personnel all said there were no windows or markings on the plane. Look closely at these photos:

Image Detail for - ... beneath the fuselage during flight. (The missile object is circled

Image Detail for - ... could accountfor the shape of the streaks on the South Tower plane

http://images.search.yahoo.com/image...mb=oa9mwQjBGpS

Image Detail for - 11 Review: ERROR: 'A Pod Was Attached to the South Tower Plane'

Image Detail for - New photo of flight 175. observe the bulge on the left side of the ...

Holograms?!?! HAHAHAHA

I think the proof they wernt passenger jets lies in the fact that the terrorists who were on board didnt empty the toilets over Brooklyn on the way out to Manhattan.;D

How did those men (on record and witnessed and taught by private flight instructors) who took all those flight lessons for a year before on public airfields, learn to fly a hologram? ;DAre these same men now innocent cab drivers out at the same airports?:-\
Does the fact Camels being called "Ships of the desert have anything to do with Arabian seamen?:-\
Will Powdered toast man save the day?:o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLNlhZJJU-E

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Holograms?!?! HAHAHAHA

---

Holograms were in Transformers so they must be true. :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Holograms?!?! HAHAHAHA

---

Holograms were in Transformers so they must be true. :cool:

---

The way 3D hologram technology operates is by creating the illusion of three-dimensional imagery. A light source is projected onto another holographic beam or onto the surface of an object and scattered. A second light illuminates the object to create interference between both sources. Essentially, the two light sources interact with each other and cause diffraction, which appears as a 3D image.
@Andre those pilots failed their air licenses at a shitty flight school in Yuma, Arizona. How the hell could they have evaded all security at all those airports, then hijacked all 4 planes using only boxcutters, then known how to fly the planes which were already flying en route to california, then shut off all transponders and fly the planes which were already 30 thousand feet high and reverse the planes and fly back and hit the WTC and Pentagon like threading the eye of a needle? No way--this was an inside job for sure--or atleast the usa knew it was happening and laid back. If they ALLOWED it to happen then they would have the excuse to invade Iraq which was stupid but americans being so stupid didnt question WHAT DID IRAQ HAVE TO DO WITH 9-11 IF THE OFFICIAL STORY WAS THAT AFGHANISTAN-BASED BIN LADEN WAS BEHIND IT??

I dont think so mate.

The Us dont need to make up excuses to go in anywhere they just do it anyway and if they make shit up the public believe them anyway.

Reason for Iraq was warheads and suspected nuclear arms being stored (none there):p who'd have guessed.

Now Afgan was for certain a direct invasion going after the culprits behind 9/11.

there is nothing to gain on the ground or through business going into Afghanistan.


In my mind, people are getting mixed up with the real false reasons for the Iraq invasion and getting the two theaters crossed up,the conspiracy theorists and many of the public.
Even though Saddam supported some terrorists and other movements against America Your goverment didnt need to kill off large numbers of the public to justify going in there;

So logically why would they do it over some backwards desolate shit hole like Afgan where the costs outweight everything and there are no returns,not even in the future rebuilding contracts as occurs in more modern places with large flattened cities?
There just isnt a reason. The terrorism is real / was real, thats the only reason to go in there.

The reason is another strategic point of influence. If America wanted Bin Laden they had the opportunity to hand over evidence to the Taliban who were willing to negotiate. They dismissed it and instead invaded. Is it really a sensible strategy to invade an entire nation in the hunt for a handful of wanted men? Most of the time negotiation would suffice and eventually you saw a different method for getting rid of Bin Laden anyway. Invading a country to capture a few terrorists is insane. If there are other motives then it starts to make more sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

The reason is another strategic point of influence. If America wanted Bin Laden they had the opportunity to hand over evidence to the Taliban who were willing to negotiate. They dismissed it and instead invaded. Is it really a sensible strategy to invade an entire nation in the hunt for a handful of wanted men? Most of the time negotiation would suffice and eventually you saw a different method for getting rid of Bin Laden anyway. Invading a country to capture a few terrorists is insane. If there are other motives then it starts to make more sense.

---

What other motives? Other than to smash all of Alqueda once and for all?
The place is good for nothing isnt it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

The reason is another strategic point of influence. If America wanted Bin Laden they had the opportunity to hand over evidence to the Taliban who were willing to negotiate. They dismissed it and instead invaded. Is it really a sensible strategy to invade an entire nation in the hunt for a handful of wanted men? Most of the time negotiation would suffice and eventually you saw a different method for getting rid of Bin Laden anyway. Invading a country to capture a few terrorists is insane. If there are other motives then it starts to make more sense.

---

What other motives? Other than to smash all of Alqueda once and for all?
The place is good for nothing isnt it?

---

To control the region. India is growing rapidly and China is to the east. America needs to keep a strong hold on the region. To be in Afghanistan would be another addition to the countless bases spread throughout the world.

Not sure thats their priority, India is nucked and hates Pakistan and visa versa they seem to keep each other at bay though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

Not sure thats their priority, India is nucked and hates Pakistan and visa versa they seem to keep each other at bay though.

---

These are the two most populated countries and both are growing in power. China is considerably ahead, but India is developing. Economically China is there and is a threat. America knows it needs a hold in the region and Afghanistan was the weakest option to invade. This century is all about China and how America attempts to mitigate the threat. History tells us it won't be very pretty.