Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Hes just a bitter little bitch.
Hes jealous that Froch is now a bigger name than him because of the Bute fight. Also, he probably wants to point out that the Mack fight means nothing because Mack was weight drained but he cant say that now can he... ;D
No matter what Ward does, he will never be a big money fighter. Hes not all that skilled, or has power. Hes fragile and needs to hold. Bika had him hurt and he ran and held. He put alot of fans off with that awfull showing against Kessler. His whole "style" is just disrupting the rythm of another fighter, which for him means holding and rubbing his head in.
So what you're saying is Froch lost to a fragile, unskilled fighter with no power, right? That can't be good
Exactly.
I like froch but ward had his number in that fight. I am sure froch has a better chance than anyone in winning the rematch but while thats not happening, ward needs to stay busy and keep fighting.
At least ward is prepared to give rematches and the win over southpaw dawson was quite an impressive fight.
Ward is getting better..every fight.
dawson isn't very good. beating him is no great accomplishment.
It's a better acomplishment than beating the overrated Bute
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Hes just a bitter little bitch.
Hes jealous that Froch is now a bigger name than him because of the Bute fight. Also, he probably wants to point out that the Mack fight means nothing because Mack was weight drained but he cant say that now can he... ;D
No matter what Ward does, he will never be a big money fighter. Hes not all that skilled, or has power. Hes fragile and needs to hold. Bika had him hurt and he ran and held. He put alot of fans off with that awfull showing against Kessler. His whole "style" is just disrupting the rythm of another fighter, which for him means holding and rubbing his head in.
So what you're saying is Froch lost to a fragile, unskilled fighter with no power, right? That can't be good
Exactly.
I like froch but ward had his number in that fight. I am sure froch has a better chance than anyone in winning the rematch but while thats not happening, ward needs to stay busy and keep fighting.
At least ward is prepared to give rematches and the win over southpaw dawson was quite an impressive fight.
Ward is getting better..every fight.
dawson isn't very good. beating him is no great accomplishment.
It's a better acomplishment than beating the overrated Bute
is it? froch exposed bute as being overrated by destroying him in a manner most people weren't expecting... whereas anyone with any boxing acumen knew dawson was crap despite all the hype in preparation for the fight.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Hes just a bitter little bitch.
Hes jealous that Froch is now a bigger name than him because of the Bute fight. Also, he probably wants to point out that the Mack fight means nothing because Mack was weight drained but he cant say that now can he... ;D
No matter what Ward does, he will never be a big money fighter. Hes not all that skilled, or has power. Hes fragile and needs to hold. Bika had him hurt and he ran and held. He put alot of fans off with that awfull showing against Kessler. His whole "style" is just disrupting the rythm of another fighter, which for him means holding and rubbing his head in.
So what you're saying is Froch lost to a fragile, unskilled fighter with no power, right? That can't be good
Exactly.
I like froch but ward had his number in that fight. I am sure froch has a better chance than anyone in winning the rematch but while thats not happening, ward needs to stay busy and keep fighting.
At least ward is prepared to give rematches and the win over southpaw dawson was quite an impressive fight.
Ward is getting better..every fight.
dawson isn't very good. beating him is no great accomplishment.
It's a better acomplishment than beating the overrated Bute
is it? froch exposed bute as being overrated by destroying him in a manner most people weren't expecting... whereas anyone with any boxing acumen knew dawson was crap despite all the hype in preparation for the fight.
You know why Froch exposed Bute? Cuz he got to him first. I have no doubt Ward and Kessler would of done the the exact same thing if they would of got to him first. And on the flip side I can't see Froch beating Dawson the way Ward did. I can't see Froch beating Dawson period.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
You know why Froch exposed Bute? Cuz he got to him first. I have no doubt Ward and Kessler would of done the the exact same thing if they would of got to him first. And on the flip side I can't see Froch beating Dawson the way Ward did. I can't see Froch beating Dawson period.
i think froch beats a weight drained dawson. no doubt about it. i'd bet he'd do him in less than 10 rounds too.
bute may not beat ward, but i think he would beat kessler by ko.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
You know why Froch exposed Bute? Cuz he got to him first. I have no doubt Ward and Kessler would of done the the exact same thing if they would of got to him first. And on the flip side I can't see Froch beating Dawson the way Ward did. I can't see Froch beating Dawson period.
i think froch beats a weight drained dawson. no doubt about it. i'd bet he'd do him in less than 10 rounds too.
bute may not beat ward, but i think he would beat kessler by ko.
I think Froch kicks the shit out of him and also agree that Bute beats Kessler. It just kills me how fast boxers get written off today. It's almost trend like. "Exposed" and "overrated" passed around like pot at a Grateful Dead concert.
Bute lost a fight against another top fighter. It was his first fight away and in hostile territory and he had a melt down. Its not the first time it has happened and it wont be the last. I'm unsure as to the reasoning behind going up to 175 unless he plans on staying. I have seen nothing in the media about why the rematch clause was not used. That Grachev fight did nothing to improve his shattered confidence. My only fear is that he could be mentally done.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Ward beating Dawson was as impressive as Froch beating Mack. Taking a fighter from a higher weight division and bringing him down does not make an impressive win.
Pascal had already beaten Dawson at his own fucking weight and Froch chased Pascal out of the supermiddles;D
Froch would have stopped Dawson alot earlier than Ward did and it would have been a shot to the chin too. As I recall, Dawson took a shot to the stomach and quit. Froch wouldnt ha e given him the chance to quit.
Frochs win over Bute is a thousand times mor impressive than Wards over Dawson.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Ward beating Dawson was as impressive as Froch beating Mack. Taking a fighter from a higher weight division and bringing him down does not make an impressive win.
Pascal had already beaten Dawson at his own fucking weight and Froch chased Pascal out of the supermiddles;D
Froch would have stopped Dawson alot earlier than Ward did and it would have been a shot to the chin too. As I recall, Dawson took a shot to the stomach and quit. Froch wouldnt ha e given him the chance to quit.
Frochs win over Bute is a thousand times mor impressive than Wards over Dawson.
True!
Yep
P4pking doesnt agree. Had a shitty little reputation comment from him telling me im a "monkey". Like a little sissy, rather than post what the reason is im wrong;D twat;D
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Ward beating Dawson was as impressive as Froch beating Mack. Taking a fighter from a higher weight division and bringing him down does not make an impressive win.
Pascal had already beaten Dawson at his own fucking weight and Froch chased Pascal out of the supermiddles;D
Froch would have stopped Dawson alot earlier than Ward did and it would have been a shot to the chin too. As I recall, Dawson took a shot to the stomach and quit. Froch wouldnt ha e given him the chance to quit.
Frochs win over Bute is a thousand times mor impressive than Wards over Dawson.
True!
Yep
P4pking doesnt agree. Had a shitty little reputation comment from him telling me im a "monkey". Like a little sissy, rather than post what the reason is im wrong;D twat;D
WHOOPS!!! hahaha.
that's strange cause he hasn't had much to contribute to this conversation.
Re: Why is Ward so against Froch-Kessler 2??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Dawson is not crap.
Bute could never beat dawson.
ward has ducked no one and froch hasnt either.
I like both fighters but ward had frochs number.
Froch also had issues with dirrell..ward is a stronger version.
i think bute would have a very good chance of beating dawson at SMW
in fact i think butes bodyshots would be the difference when fighting a weight drained fighter
at light heavy dawson would be a strong favourite to beat bute